[Skip to Content]
Sign In
Individual Sign In
Create an Account
Institutional Sign In
OpenAthens Shibboleth
Purchase Options:
[Skip to Content Landing]
Article
March 5, 1932

THE MIGRATION, FOR TREATMENT, OF PATIENTS WITH GONORRHEA OR SYPHILIS: COMPARISON WITH THAT OF PATIENTS WITH TUBERCULOSIS IN MASSACHUSETTS IN 1930

Author Affiliations

BOSTON

From the Massachusetts Department of Public Health.

JAMA. 1932;98(10):794-799. doi:10.1001/jama.1932.02730360016004
Abstract

Many opinions have been expressed, founded largely on impression, as to the extent to which patients leave their home towns for treatment of gonorrhea or syphilis, and as to why and to what extent they choose between physicians and clinics. The desire for secrecy, the scarcity of specialists in the smaller communities, the high cost of adequate treatment, the availability of clinics and other reasons are advanced in behalf of the various opinions. Actual data to support these impressions are lacking.

The Massachusetts Department of Public Health recently modified its system of reporting gonorrhea and syphilis. As one result of this change it has been possible to study some of these obscure matters and to arrive at some conclusions of qualitative, if not quantitative, value.

Unfortunately, since the new system went into effect on Jan. 1, 1930, only some 6,200 cases of gonorrhea and 3,500 cases of syphilis, reported by

References
1.
Nelson, N. A., and Scamman, C. L.:  Gonorrhea and Syphilis in Massachusetts in 1930 ,  New England J. Med. 204: 637 ( (March 26) ) 1931.Crossref
2.
State Health District No. 2, consisting of Arlington, Belmont, Boston, Brookline, Cambridge, Chelsea, Dedham, Everett, Maiden, Medford, Milton, Needham, Newton, Quincy, Revere, Somerville, Waltham, Watertown, Wellesley, Weston and Winthrop.
×