Customize your JAMA Network experience by selecting one or more topics from the list below.
This article is only available in the PDF format. Download the PDF to view the article, as well as its associated figures and tables.
To the Editor:—
Dr. Howie's attack against anticoagulants is irrelevant to my special communication to The Journal, which was designed exclusively to criticize a specific publication by a group of Danish physicians. Dr. Howie has failed to take issue with the esential criticisms which I made of the Danish report: (1) The study was unsatisfactorily controlled, since treated and untreated patients were not chosen by random selection (alternate case method). (2) Thromboembolic complications, the prevention of which is the major objective of anticoagulant therapy, were significantly reduced, according to the authors' statistical analysis. Therefore, their conclusion that "the use of anticoagulants in acute myocardial infarction should be abandoned" is not justified.The Danish report does not provide evidence to support Dr. Howie's conjecture that deaths from anticoagulants outweigh the benefits of reduction in thromboembolism. Neither does this report indicate an increased incidence of cardiac rupture in the anticoagulated group; in
Friedberg CK. Anticoagulant Therapy in Acute Myocardial Infarction-Reply. JAMA. 1962;181(9):805. doi:10.1001/jama.1962.03050350066023
Coronavirus Resource Center
Create a personal account or sign in to: