Customize your JAMA Network experience by selecting one or more topics from the list below.
This article is only available in the PDF format. Download the PDF to view the article, as well as its associated figures and tables.
To the Editor:—
Dr. Maurice B. Visscher in his fine essay on vivisection and medical ethics (199: 631, 1967) warns of the threat to experimental medicine and biology posed by government-bureau restraint. Certainly any reasonable man must agree with him. But does not the same argument apply to government-bureau restraint of medical practice? Dr. Visscher cites John Dewey's observation that opponents of animal experimentation demand what is in effect "class legislation, putting scientific men under peculiar surveillance and limitation." Does not this argument pertain also to legislation putting under such surveillance and limitation the practicing physician, who applies medical science to the care of the human individual? Are practicing physicians less to be trusted ethically than research scientists? My experience does not tell me so—and I do not intend by this remark offense to those in research.Experience does tell me that the great majority of people in medical research
Clarke CE. Ethics. Research, and Animal Welfare. JAMA. 1967;201(1):66. doi:10.1001/jama.1967.03130010092032
Coronavirus Resource Center
Create a personal account or sign in to: