[Skip to Content]
Sign In
Individual Sign In
Create an Account
Institutional Sign In
OpenAthens Shibboleth
Purchase Options:
[Skip to Content Landing]
Article
February 23, 1994

Predicting Smoking Cessation: Who Will Quit With and Without the Nicotine Patch

Author Affiliations

From the Center for Tobacco Research and Intervention (Ms Kenford, Drs Fiore, Jorenby, Smith, and Baker, and Mr Wetter) and the Section of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine (Drs Fiore and Jorenby), University of Wisconsin Medical School, and the University of Wisconsin Comprehensive Cancer Center (Drs Fiore, Jorenby, and Baker), Madison; and Department of Psychology, University of Wisconsin, Madison (Ms Kenford, Drs Smith and Baker, and Mr Wetter). Drs Fiore, Jorenby, Smith, and Baker, Ms Kenford, and Mr Wetter have conducted research funded in part by CIBA-GEIGY Corp, Edison, NJ; Elan Pharmaceuticals Ltd, Athlone, Ireland; and Lederle Laboratories, Wayne, NJ. Dr Fiore has also received honoraria for educational activities from CIBA-GEIGY Corp, Lederle Laboratories, Marion Merrell Dow Inc, Kansas City, Mo, and Parke-Davis, Morris Plains, NJ.

JAMA. 1994;271(8):589-594. doi:10.1001/jama.1994.03510320029025
Abstract

Objective.  —To identify predictors of smoking cessation success or failure with and without transdermal nicotine patch treatment.

Design.  —Two independent randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies using the nicotine patch assessing outcome at the end of treatment and at 6-month follow-up; each study used a different mode of adjuvant counseling.

Patients.  —Subjects were daily smokers (≥15 cigarettes per day), aged 21 to 65 years with expired air carbon monoxide levels of at least 10 ppm, and motivated to quit. Eighty-eight subjects participated in study 1, and 112 subjects participated in study 2.

Intervention.  —Study 1 consisted of 8 weeks of 22-mg nicotine patch therapy with intensive group counseling. Study 2 consisted of 4 weeks of 22-mg nicotine patch therapy and 2 weeks of 11-mg nicotine patch therapy with brief individual counseling.

Main Outcome Measures.  —The prediction of smoking cessation (at end of treatment and after 6 months) based on pretreatment and intratreatment measures in smokers using active or placebo nicotine patches.

Results.  —Pretreatment markers, such as the Fagerstrom Tolerance Questionnaire score, number of cigarettes smoked per day, years smoked, expired air carbon monoxide level, or baseline blood nicotine and cotinine levels, showed no consistent relationship with successful smoking cessation across both studies. Of the intratreatment markers examined, withdrawal severity and nicotine replacement levels also were not consistently predictive of cessation success. However, any smoking during the second week of treatment was a consistent and powerful predictor of failure at the end of treatment and after 6 months. Among active nicotine patch patients who smoked at all during week 2 after quitting, 83% and 97% (studies 1 and 2, respectively) were smoking at 6-month follow-up. Conversely, abstinence during the second week of treatment predicted successful smoking cessation. Among active nicotine patch patients who were totally abstinent during week 2 after quitting, 46% and 41% (studies 1 and 2, respectively) were abstinent at 6-month follow-up. Of all nicotine patch patients in both studies who were smoking at 6-month follow-up, 74% began smoking during week 1 or 2. Among all placebo patch patients who were smoking at 6-month follow-up, 86% began smoking during week 1 or 2.

Conclusions.  —Smoking status (abstinent or smoking) during the first 2 weeks of nicotine patch therapy, particularly week 2, was highly correlated with clinical outcome and can serve as a powerful predictor of smoking cessation. Early smoking behavior also predicted outcome among placebo patch users. Traditional measures of dependence are not consistently predictive of cessation success. Clinicians are advised to emphasize the importance of total abstinence after a quit attempt and to follow-up with patients within the first 2 weeks of quitting; smoking during this critical time should be assessed and treatment may be altered as appropriate.(JAMA. 1994;271:589-594)

References
1.
Fiore MC, Jorenby DE, Baker TB, Kenford SL.  Tobacco dependence and the nicotine patch: clinical guidelines for effective use.  JAMA . 1992;268:2687-2694.Crossref
2.
Fiore MC, Kenford SL, Jorenby DE, Wetter DW, Smith SS, Baker TB.  The nicotine patch: clinical effectiveness with different counseling treatments.  Chest . In press.
3.
Zelman DC, Brandon TH, Jorenby DE, Baker TB.  Measures of affect and nicotine dependence predict differential response to smoking cessation treatments.  J Consult Clin Psychol . 1992;60:943-952.Crossref
4.
Tiffany ST, Baker TB.  The role of aversion and counseling strategies in treatments for cigarette smoking.  In: Baker TB, Cannon DS, eds.  Assessment and Treatment of Addictive Disorders . New York, NY: Praeger; 1988;238-289.
5.
West DW, Graham S, Swanson M, Wilkinson G.  Five year follow-up of a smoking withdrawal clinic population.  Am J Public Health . 1977;67:536-544.Crossref
6.
Horwitz MB, Hindi-Alexander MI, Wagner TJ.  Psychosocial mediators of abstinence, relapse, and continued smoking: a one-year follow-up of a minimal intervention.  Addict Behav . 1985;10:29-39.Crossref
7.
Garvey AJ, Bliss RE, Hitchcock JL, Heinhold JW, Rosner B.  Predictors of smoking relapse among self-quitters: a report from the normative aging study.  Addict Behav . 1992;17:367-371.Crossref
8.
Pinto RP, Abrams DB, Monti PM, Jacobus SI.  Nicotine dependence and likelihood of quitting smoking.  Addict Behav . 1987;12:371-374.Crossref
9.
Fagerstrom KO, Schneider NG.  Measuring nicotine dependence: a review of the Fagerstrom Tolerance Questionnaire.  J Behav Med . 1989;12:159-182.Crossref
10.
Killen JD, Fortmann SP, Kraemer, HC, Varady A, Newman B.  Who will relapse? symptoms of nicotine dependence predict long-term relapse after smoking cessation.  J Consult Clin Psychol . 1992;60:797-801.Crossref
11.
Abelin T, Buehler A, Muller P, Vesanen K, Imhof PR.  Controlled trial of transdermal nicotine patch in tobacco withdrawal.  Lancet . 1989;1:7-10.Crossref
12.
Transdermal Nicotine Study Group.  Transdermal nicotine for smoking cessation.  JAMA . 1991; 266:3133-3138.Crossref
13.
Hughes JR, Hatsukami D.  Signs and symptoms of tobacco withdrawal.  Arch Gen Psychiatry . 1986; 43:289-294.Crossref
14.
Beck AT, Ward CH, Mendelson M, Mack J, Erbaugh J.  An inventory for measuring depression.  Arch Gen Psychiatry . 1961;4:561-571.Crossref
15.
Hurt RD, Lowell CD, Offord KP, et al.  Serum nicotine and cotinine levels during nicotine-patch therapy.  Clin Pharmacol Ther . 1993;54:98-106.Crossref
16.
Russell MA.  Nicotine replacement: the role of blood nicotine levels, their rate of change and nicotine tolerance.  In:  Nicotine Replacement: A Critical Evaluation . New York, NY: Alan R Liss Inc; 1988:64-94.
17.
Hughes JR.  Tobacco withdrawal in self-quitters.  J Consult Clin Psychol . 1992;60:689-697.Crossref
18.
Brandon TH, Zelman DC, Baker TB.  Effects of maintenance sessions on smoking relapse: delaying the inevitable.  J Consult Clin Psychol . 1987;55: 780-782.Crossref
19.
Hall SM, Havassy BE, Wasserman DA.  Commitment to abstinence and acute stress in relapse to alcohol, opiates, and nicotine.  J Consult Clin Psychol . 1990;58:175-181.Crossref
20.
Lando HA, Hellerstedt, WL, Pirie PL, McGovern PG.  Brief supportive telephone outreach as a recruitment and intervention strategy for smoking cessation.  Am J Public Health . 1992;82:41-46.Crossref
21.
Orleans CT.  Treating nicotine dependence in medical settings: a stepped-care model.  In: Orleans CT, Slade J, eds.  Nicotine Addiction: Principles and Management . New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 1993:145-161.
22.
Fiore MC.  Smoking status: the new vital sign assessing and documenting smoking status.  JAMA . 1991;266:3183-3184.Crossref
×