[Skip to Content]
Sign In
Individual Sign In
Create an Account
Institutional Sign In
OpenAthens Shibboleth
Purchase Options:
[Skip to Content Landing]
Article
November 18, 1983

Abdominal Aspiration Biopsies: Sonographic v Computed Tomographic Guidance

Author Affiliations

From the Departments of Radiology, University of Miami School of Medicine and Jackson Memorial Hospital, Miami. Dr Pelaez is now with Doctors Hospital of Lake Worth (Fla); Dr Hill is now with The George Washington University Medical Center, Washington, DC; Dr Dach is now with Hollywood (Fla) Memorial Hospital; and Dr Isikoff is now with Jess Parrish Memorial Hospital, Titusville, Fla.

JAMA. 1983;250(19):2663-2666. doi:10.1001/jama.1983.03340190065034
Abstract

One hundred eighty-four diagnostic aspirations performed on 169 patients were reviewed (1) to define the decision process regarding which guidance method (sonography v computed tomography) should be used on any given patient, and (2) to determine, once a guidance method was chosen, its accuracy and complication rate. Sonographic guidance (84%) proved to be an effective method for obtaining a correct diagnosis in 98% (110/112) of cystic masses and 79% (34/43) of solid masses. Computed tomography (16%) was used when sonography could not identify the mass or when the mass was small, deeply located, and often solid. Computed tomographic guidance provided a correct diagnosis in 100% (13/13) of cystic masses and 81% (13/16) of solid masses.

(JAMA 1983;250:2663-2666)

References
1.
Ferrucci JT Jr, Wittenberg J, Mueller PR, et al:  Diagnosis of abdominal malignancy by radiologic fine-needle aspiration biopsy .  AJR 1980;134:323-330.Crossref
2.
Nosher JL, Plafker J:  Fine needle aspiration of the liver with ultrasound guidance .  Radiology 1980;136:177-180.
3.
Zornoza J, Wallace S, Ordonez N, et al:  Fine needle aspiration biopsy of the liver .  AJR 1980; 134:331-334.Crossref
4.
Mitty HA, Efremidis SC, Yeh H-C:  Impact of fine-needle biopsy on management of patients with carcinoma of the pancreas .  AJR 1981; 137:1119-1121.Crossref
5.
Heaston DK, Handel DB, Ashton PR, et al:  Narrow gauge needle aspiration of solid adrenal masses .  AJR 1982;138:1143-1148.Crossref
6.
Isler RJ, Ferrucci JT Jr, Wittenberg J, et al:  Tissue core biopsy of abdominal tumors with a 22 gauge cutting needle .  AJR 1981;136:725-728.Crossref
7.
Bree RL, Schwab RE, Neiman HL:  The solitary echogenic spot in the liver: Is it diagnostic of a hemangioma ?  AJR 1983;140:41-45.Crossref
8.
Haaga JR:  New techniques for CT-guided biopsies .  AJR 1979;133:633-641.Crossref
9.
Dach JL, Hill MC, Pelaez JC, et al:  Sonography of hypertensive portal venous system: Correlation with arterial portography .  AJR 1981; 137:511-517.Crossref
10.
Van Sonnenberg E, Wittenberg J, Ferrucci JT Jr, et al:  Triangulation method for percutaneous needle guidance: The angled approach to upper abdominal masses .  AJR 1981;137:757-761.Crossref
×