[Skip to Content]
[Skip to Content Landing]
Article
March 9, 1984

House Officer Employment-Reply

Author Affiliations

University of Arizona Health Sciences Center Tucson

JAMA. 1984;251(10):1279. doi:10.1001/jama.1984.03340340021014

This article is only available in the PDF format. Download the PDF to view the article, as well as its associated figures and tables.

Abstract

In Reply.—  Mr Schechter's response is appreciated. There is less disagreement in philosophy than he perceives. I neither justified nor defended the working conditions of present or past house officers. Neither did I argue for or against salary or other forms of compensation. Rather, the need is for concern, regardless of the setting today or in the past. The attitude of concern for house officers can be rationalized to another level if the employee-employer relation is the emphasis. Indeed, I argue for special attention to the circumstances of house officer employment, recognizing that the presence of compensation may create an adversarial environment in which personal problem-solving becomes very difficult.

×