[Skip to Content]
Sign In
Individual Sign In
Create an Account
Institutional Sign In
OpenAthens Shibboleth
Purchase Options:
[Skip to Content Landing]
Article
May 4, 1984

Declining Autopsy Rates and Diagnosis of Myocardial Infarction-Reply

Author Affiliations

University of Illinois Hospital Chicago
Baptist Memorial Hospital Memphis

JAMA. 1984;251(17):2209-2210. doi:10.1001/jama.1984.03340410020018

This article is only available in the PDF format. Download the PDF to view the article, as well as its associated figures and tables.

Abstract

In Reply.—  In regard to Lawrence K. Altman's interesting speculation and question, we have not done the alternative study, namely, to determine how frequently the diagnosis of myocardial infarction is made but not confirmed by autopsy. In autopsied cases, records can be retrieved only by use of the corrected diagnosis as established by the autopsy; the determination of antemortem diagnoses would require a careful study of the records of all patients whose autopsy diagnosis was not acute myocardial infarction—a much more time-consuming process than the published study and one that has not been done.It is purely impression, but we suspect that the number of incorrect diagnoses of acute myocardial infarction would certainly equal the number of cases in which actual myocardial infarction was missed; hence, the two errors could counterbalance one another and the changing autopsy percentages could be expected to have little effect on changing rates of cardiovascular

×