Customize your JAMA Network experience by selecting one or more topics from the list below.
This article is only available in the PDF format. Download the PDF to view the article, as well as its associated figures and tables.
To the Editor:— Dr. David Seegal's commentary (199:31, 1967) on angry students and changes in medical education is timely but somewhat unjust. It is an oversimplification to label as angry students those undergraduates who agitate sincerely and articulately for improvement and reform. Anger is found only as an expression of disappointment. To brand a student as angry is to label him patronizingly as a stereotype at best and a poseur at worst. If a medical school is a student-directed institution, some emotional reaction in place of apathy from the student concerning his education is not at all inappropriate in circumstances that warrant it.
To the Editor:— Students are surprisingly aware of the difficulties of teaching well and are most appreciative of teaching skill. Most would wholeheartedly agree, I am sure, with Dr. Seegal's statement that "teaching future teachers to teach" would form an appropriate part of a medical school curriculum, yielding the
Gutheil TG. Letter From an "Angry Student". JAMA. 1967;199(12):947. doi:10.1001/jama.1967.03120120135037
Coronavirus Resource Center
Create a personal account or sign in to: