[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Views 66
Citations 0
Comment & Response
September 26, 2018

Public Reporting of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Outcomes Done Differently—Leading From Washington—Reply

Author Affiliations
  • 1Brigham and Women’s Hospital Heart and Vascular Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
  • 2Richard and Susan Smith Center for Outcomes Research in Cardiology, Division of Cardiology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
JAMA Cardiol. Published online September 26, 2018. doi:10.1001/jamacardio.2018.3010

In Reply We appreciate the letter by Hira et al in response to our article regarding public reporting of percutaneous coronary (PCI) outcomes.1 As the authors note, the Clinical Outcomes Assessment Program (COAP) is a reporting initiative in Washington that is unique and has many strengths, and we appreciate the importance of well-intentioned and thoughtful physicians leading efforts to improve patient care.