Can a simplified anatomical scoring system adapted for registry data reproduce the established associations between increasing anatomical complexity and adverse outcomes after revascularization?
In this cross-sectional multiple-center study of 50 226 patients undergoing percutaneous or surgical revascularization, adaptation of the Veterans Affairs SYNTAX simplified anatomical scoring system for coronary artery disease complexity found an association between increasing anatomical complexity and adverse events among patients undergoing percutaneous revascularization but not among patients undergoing surgical revascularization.
The Veterans Affairs SYNTAX score may be able to assess longitudinal risk of revascularization using registry data based on coronary anatomical complexity and may represent a powerful tool in understanding longitudinal risk in large data sets.
Anatomical scoring systems for coronary artery disease, such as the SYNTAX (Synergy Between Percutaneous Coronary Intervention [PCI] With Taxus and Cardiac Surgery) score, are well established tools for understanding patient risk. However, they are cumbersome to compute manually for large data sets, limiting their use across broad and varied cohorts.
To adapt an anatomical scoring system for use with registry data, allowing facile and automatic calculation of scores and association with clinical outcomes among patients undergoing percutaneous or surgical revascularization.
Design, Setting, and Participants
This cross-sectional observational cohort study involved procedures performed in all cardiac catheterization laboratories in the largest integrated health care system in the United States, the Veterans Affairs (VA) Healthcare System. Patients undergoing coronary angiography in the VA Healthcare System followed by percutaneous or surgical revascularization within 90 days were observed and data were analyzed from January 1, 2010, through September 30, 2017.
Main Outcomes and Measures
An anatomical scoring system for coronary artery disease complexity before revascularization was simplified and adapted to data from the VA Clinical Assessment, Reporting, and Tracking Program. The adjusted association between quantified anatomical complexity and major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCEs), including death, myocardial infarction, stroke, and repeat revascularization, was assessed for patients undergoing percutaneous or surgical revascularization.
A total of 50 226 patients (49 359 men [98.3%]; mean [SD] age, 66  years) underwent revascularization during the study period, with 34 322 undergoing PCI and 15 904 undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). After adjustment, the highest tertile of anatomical complexity was associated with increased hazard of MACCEs (adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 2.12; 95% CI, 2.01-2.23). In contrast, the highest tertile of anatomical complexity among patients undergoing CABG was not independently associated with overall MACCEs (adjusted HR, 1.04; 95% CI, 0.92-1.17), and only repeat revascularization was associated with increasing complexity (adjusted HR, 1.34; 95% CI, 1.06-1.70) in this subgroup.
Conclusions and Relevance
These findings suggest that an automatically computed score assessing anatomical complexity can be used to assess longitudinal risk for patients undergoing revascularization. This simplified scoring system appears to be an alternative tool for understanding longitudinal risk across large data sets.
Valle JA, Glorioso TJ, Bricker R, et al. Association of Coronary Anatomical Complexity With Clinical Outcomes After Percutaneous or Surgical Revascularization in the Veterans Affairs Clinical Assessment Reporting and Tracking Program. JAMA Cardiol. Published online June 26, 2019. doi:10.1001/jamacardio.2019.1923
Customize your JAMA Network experience by selecting one or more topics from the list below.
Create a personal account or sign in to: