Success is a few simple disciplines, practiced every day; while failure is simply a few errors in judgment, repeated every day.Jim Rohn, “This Coach Improved Every Tiny Thing by 1 Percent and Here’s What Happened,” 20181
Success is a few simple disciplines, practiced every day; while failure is simply a few errors in judgment, repeated every day.
The advancements in interventional cardiology since Andreas Gruentzig performed the first coronary angioplasty have been remarkable. Major innovations, such as primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), improvements in antithrombotic pharmacology, and the development of coronary stents and drug-eluting technology have resulted in substantial gains in cardiovascular outcomes and were accordingly widely adopted. In years since, there has been continued focus on identifying clinical practices to further improve patient outcomes, albeit with perhaps smaller incremental benefits to patients. Examples include advancements in medical therapy, the adoption of radial artery access, the use of ultrasound guidance for vascular access, and intracoronary physiology and imaging use to guide PCI. However, many cardiologists are slow or resistant to incorporate these and other contemporary practices. At conferences, in hospitals, and on social media, they may reference the “marginal gains” associated with individual practices they perceive to be time-intensive, cost-prohibitive, or unnecessary. But is it possible that in the modern era, a focus on marginal gains is the key to further improving interventional outcomes?
Khuddus MA, Truesdell AG, Kirtane AJ. Leveraging the Power of Marginal Gains to Improve Outcomes in Interventional Cardiology. JAMA Cardiol. 2020;5(2):121–123. doi:10.1001/jamacardio.2019.4278
Coronavirus Resource Center
Customize your JAMA Network experience by selecting one or more topics from the list below.
Create a personal account or sign in to: