In the United States, incidence rates of myocardial infarction (MI) have declined owing to advancements in preventive care.1 In addition, more recent randomized clinical trials have supported the role of medical therapy in the initial management of stable ischemic heart disease.2,3 Although the epidemiology of MI and practice patterns for stable ischemic heart disease have changed over time, it remains unclear how these shifts have affected percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) rates. Prior studies of PCI trends have been restricted to select populations and have often not included PCIs performed in the outpatient setting, which have increased in recent years.4-6 Therefore, in this study, we provide a contemporary assessment of population-level trends in PCI use among all age groups, insurance payers, and hospital settings across 4 US states.
Identify all potential conflicts of interest that might be relevant to your comment.
Conflicts of interest comprise financial interests, activities, and relationships within the past 3 years including but not limited to employment, affiliation, grants or funding, consultancies, honoraria or payment, speaker's bureaus, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, royalties, donation of medical equipment, or patents planned, pending, or issued.
Err on the side of full disclosure.
If you have no conflicts of interest, check "No potential conflicts of interest" in the box below. The information will be posted with your response.
Not all submitted comments are published. Please see our commenting policy for details.
Almarzooq ZI, Wadhera RK, Xu J, Yeh RW. Population Trends in Rates of Percutaneous Coronary Interventions, 2010 to 2017. JAMA Cardiol. 2021;6(10):1219–1220. doi:10.1001/jamacardio.2021.2639
Coronavirus Resource Center
Customize your JAMA Network experience by selecting one or more topics from the list below.
Create a personal account or sign in to: