[Skip to Navigation]
Sign In
Correction
August 2018

Correction of Units of Measure in a Table and the Text

JAMA Cardiol. 2018;3(8):782. doi:10.1001/jamacardio.2018.1880

In the Original Investigation titled “Association of Cardiovascular Outcomes With Masked Hypertension Defined by Home Blood Pressure Monitoring in a Japanese General Practice Population,” published online May 23, 2018, and in the July issue of JAMA Cardiology,1 incorrect units of measure were given in Table 2 and in corresponding text in the Results section. In Table 2, the first 2 rows of data for stroke events should have appeared in a single row, with the variable identified as “Stroke events, No. (No. per 1000 person-years) [95% CI]” and the data given as “8 (1.7) [0.9-3.4]” for the controlled blood pressure (BP) group, “3 (1.3) [0.4-3.8]” for the white-coat hypertension group, “18 (5.4) [3.4-8.5]” for the masked hypertension group, and “45 (6.9) [5.2-9.3]” for the sustained hypertension group. Likewise, the first 2 rows of data for coronary heart disease (CHD) events should have appeared in a single row, with the variable identified as “CHD events, No. (No. per 1000 person-years) [95% CI]” and the data given as “25 (5.4) [3.6-7.9]” for the controlled BP group, “9 (3.8) [2.0-7.3]” for the white-coat hypertension group, “13 (3.9) [2.3-6.6]” for the masked hypertension group, and “30 (4.6) [3.2-6.6]” for the sustained hypertension group. In the Results section of the text, the third sentence of the second paragraph should have read as follows: “The masked hypertension group had a higher incidence rate of stroke events compared with the controlled BP group (5.4 per 1000 person-years; 95% CI, 3.4-8.5 vs 1.7 per 1000 person-years; 95% CI, 0.9-3.4).” This article was corrected online.

References
1.
Fujiwara  T, Yano  Y, Hoshide  S, Kanegae  H, Kario  K.  Association of cardiovascular outcomes with masked hypertension defined by home blood pressure monitoring in a Japanese general practice population  [published online May 23, 2018].  JAMA Cardiol. doi:10.1001/jamacardio.2018.1233Google Scholar
×