[Skip to Navigation]
Sign In
Correction
September 16, 2020

Error in Organization Name for Reported Recommendations

JAMA Cardiol. 2020;5(11):1308. doi:10.1001/jamacardio.2020.4245

In the Invited Commentary titled “Transcatheter Mitral Valve-in-Valve—A Plausible Option but Questions Remain,”1 published online July 29, 2020, the wrong organization was listed regarding class IIa recommendations. The American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association, rather than the New York Heart Association, should have been cited. The article has been corrected online.

References
1.
Asgar  AW.  Transcatheter mitral valve-in-valve—a plausible option but questions remain.   JAMA Cardiol. Published online July 29, 2020. doi:10.1001/jamacardio.2020.2993Google Scholar
×