Author Affiliations: Department of Dermatology, Rush Medical College, Rush University, Chicago, Illinois.
Melski provides a geometric representation of derived Bayesian analysis data1 according to sensitivity and specificity of SLNB status for cutaneous melanoma (CM) related death, segregated by tumor thickness. Given these data, the prognostic usefulness of SLNB for CM-related death must be questioned.
Wong et al2 provide a thoughtful commentary immediately following the Bayesian analysis,1 highlighting the paucity of informative reports with raw numbers available for patients with CM who have thick tumors ( ≥4 mm). Most SLNB reports are univariate and/or multivariate analyses and include tumors of any thickness, a broad range of patient age, and short follow-up intervals. Wong et al2 quote their own univariate and multivariate analysis3 for patients with thick tumors who routinely undergo SLNB, showing a markedly improved 5-year overall survival rate when the SLNB result is negative for CM. However, statistical significance does not always equate with clinical usefulness.
Rhodes AR. Visualizing Bayesian Analysis Using a Spreadsheet Geometry —Reply. Arch Dermatol. 2011;147(10):1225–1227. doi:10.1001/archdermatol.2011.296
Coronavirus Resource Center
Customize your JAMA Network experience by selecting one or more topics from the list below.
Create a personal account or sign in to: