[Skip to Navigation]
November 2014

Mid-Level Practitioners in Dermatology: A Need for Further Study and Oversight

Author Affiliations
  • 1Division of Dermatology, University of California, Los Angeles
  • 2Wellman Center for Photomedicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston
  • 3Department of Dermatology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston
JAMA Dermatol. 2014;150(11):1149-1151. doi:10.1001/jamadermatol.2014.1922
Add or change institution
Limit 200 characters
Limit 25 characters
Conflicts of Interest Disclosure

Identify all potential conflicts of interest that might be relevant to your comment.

Conflicts of interest comprise financial interests, activities, and relationships within the past 3 years including but not limited to employment, affiliation, grants or funding, consultancies, honoraria or payment, speaker's bureaus, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, royalties, donation of medical equipment, or patents planned, pending, or issued.

Err on the side of full disclosure.

If you have no conflicts of interest, check "No potential conflicts of interest" in the box below. The information will be posted with your response.

Not all submitted comments are published. Please see our commenting policy for details.

Limit 140 characters
Limit 3600 characters or approximately 600 words
    1 Comment for this article
    Comment of Mid-Level Practitioners in Dermatology
    Binh Ngo, M.D. | Keck U.S.C. School of Medicine
    The article: Scope of Physician Procedures Independently Billed by Mid-Level Providers in the Office Setting by Coldiron and Ratnarathorn in the August edition of JAMA Dermatology (1) raises awareness of an alarming trend to substitute physician extenders for trained and qualified physicians in the diagnosis and treatment of complex conditions. Dermatology is a specialty requiring four years of training. Board certification requires documentation of adequate performance on a large number of procedures and success on a difficult examination and subsequent recertification at ten year intervals. Physician assistants and nurse practitioners do not have this training, nor proof of adequate performance. The original intent to expand primary care was to allow physician extenders to deal with common conditions with simple treatments. That intent has been grossly perverted. The Medicare payment data cited by the authors confirms the reality that physician extenders are now independently evaluating complex conditions and performing surgical procedures without physician overview. I have seen many cases where improper care was delivered by such unsupervised staff. For example, an electrodesiccation and curettage was performed on an invasive squamous cell carcinoma on the scalp, a lupus rash misdiagnosed as contact dermatitis, and mastitis misdiagnosed as contact dermatitis and improperly treated with prednisone. In some practices, these staff members perform Mohs surgery on difficult to eradicate skin cancers, procedures wherein dermatologists typically receive an additional year of Fellowship training. The role of a physician extender should be to supplement the work of a physician, not to practice medicine autonomously. Patients are often shunted to physician extenders when they arrive for appointments with the physician. They should be informed beforehand whether the doctor or physician extenders will be seeing them in the office and who will be doing a procedure on them. If given the choice, patients overwhelmingly want their care to be provided by qualified professionals (2). The current trend to degrade qualifications of those providing needed care is fueled by the desire of government and insurers to lower the cost of health care, abetted by the greed of physicians who want to bill for care they do not perform. Foreign medical graduates who have been trained in their country of origin are obligated to pursue a full course of post graduate residency in the United States before they can carry out a specialty. Physician extenders should likewise have a full course of specialty training prior to being allowed to function in complex activities..REFERENCES:1) Coldiron B, Ratnarathorn M. Scope of Physician Procedures Independently Billed by Mid-Level Providers in the Office Setting. JAMA Dermatol. 2014 Aug 11. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2014.1773. [Epub ahead of print]2) Bangash HK, Ibrahimi OA, Green LJ, Alam M, Eisen DB, Armstrong AW.Who do you prefer? A study of public preferences for health care provider type in performing cutaneous surgery and cosmetic procedures in the United States. Dermatol Surg. 2014 Jun;40(6):671-8. doi: 10.1111/dsu.0000000000000016.