[Skip to Navigation]
Views 642
Citations 0
Editorial
February 26, 2020

Challenges in Understanding, Scoring, and Comparing Patients’ Reports

Author Affiliations
  • 1Department of Dermatology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
JAMA Dermatol. 2020;156(4):369-370. doi:10.1001/jamadermatol.2019.4658

Outcomes researchers who work with patients’ reports (often called patient-reported outcomes, or PROs) are accustomed to skepticism.1 For example, although the measurement of PROs is based on decades of quantitative social science research, other scientists may doubt that patients’ reports can be measured accurately. Similarly, quantitative scores of PRO tools are often unfamiliar, and clinicians may question whether PROs are useful to inform decision-making or improve care.

Limit 200 characters
Limit 25 characters
Conflicts of Interest Disclosure

Identify all potential conflicts of interest that might be relevant to your comment.

Conflicts of interest comprise financial interests, activities, and relationships within the past 3 years including but not limited to employment, affiliation, grants or funding, consultancies, honoraria or payment, speaker's bureaus, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, royalties, donation of medical equipment, or patents planned, pending, or issued.

Err on the side of full disclosure.

If you have no conflicts of interest, check "No potential conflicts of interest" in the box below. The information will be posted with your response.

Not all submitted comments are published. Please see our commenting policy for details.

Limit 140 characters
Limit 3600 characters or approximately 600 words
    ×