Outcomes researchers who work with patients’ reports (often called patient-reported outcomes, or PROs) are accustomed to skepticism.1 For example, although the measurement of PROs is based on decades of quantitative social science research, other scientists may doubt that patients’ reports can be measured accurately. Similarly, quantitative scores of PRO tools are often unfamiliar, and clinicians may question whether PROs are useful to inform decision-making or improve care.
Identify all potential conflicts of interest that might be relevant to your comment.
Conflicts of interest comprise financial interests, activities, and relationships within the past 3 years including but not limited to employment, affiliation, grants or funding, consultancies, honoraria or payment, speaker's bureaus, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, royalties, donation of medical equipment, or patents planned, pending, or issued.
Err on the side of full disclosure.
If you have no conflicts of interest, check "No potential conflicts of interest" in the box below. The information will be posted with your response.
Not all submitted comments are published. Please see our commenting policy for details.
Chren M. Challenges in Understanding, Scoring, and Comparing Patients’ Reports. JAMA Dermatol. 2020;156(4):369–370. doi:10.1001/jamadermatol.2019.4658
Customize your JAMA Network experience by selecting one or more topics from the list below.
Create a personal account or sign in to: