[Skip to Navigation]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
April 29, 2020

Multidisciplinary and Holistic Models of Care for Patients With Dermatologic Disease and Psychosocial Comorbidity: A Systematic Review

Author Affiliations
  • 1Currently a medical student at Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina
  • 2Division of Psychodermatology, Department of Psychiatry, Central Michigan University College of Medicine, Saginaw, Michigan
JAMA Dermatol. 2020;156(6):686-694. doi:10.1001/jamadermatol.2020.0394
Key Points

Question  What are the structural aspects and models of care in psychocutaneous medicine?

Findings  This systematic review of 1677 patients in 23 studies provides management approaches and insights regarding the existing gap of specialized care options for patients with psychocutaneous disease.

Meaning  Among the many different models for psychocutaneous care, this systematic review may serve as the first structural analysis of combined clinics with evidence-based recommendations for future expansion.


Importance  Psychocutaneous disease affects an underrecognized patient population facing misdiagnosis and a reduced quality of life due to knowledge gaps and insufficient awareness. Clinicians worldwide serve as pioneers in offering specialized care for affected patients through the development of combined clinics. Results yield a framework needed to expand availability and ultimately improve patient outcomes.

Objectives  To report key findings generated from an in-depth analysis of available literature, highlight the importance and benefits of providing multidisciplinary care, and provide structural evidence of existing liaison clinics for more widespread future application.

Evidence Review  To identify data from inception to November 12, 2019, a search was conducted in PubMed and Google Scholar using the following search strategy: psychodermatology clinic OR psychodermatology liaison OR psychodermatology combined OR psychocutaneous clinic OR psychocutaneous liaison OR psychocutaneous combined OR psychiatry dermatology combined OR psychiatry dermatology clinic. Studies were excluded if they were single-patient case reports; if information regarding the number of patients, clinic setup, and presenting conditions was not provided; and if the reports were published in a language other than English.

Findings  A total of 932 studies were screened, and 23 were retained after removal of duplicates and application of inclusion criteria. The combined clinics, varying in structure, design, and setting, provided collective data from 1677 patients in 12 countries worldwide. Results indicate that patients experience barriers in gaining access to care and clinicians lack appropriate knowledge and resources for proper diagnosis and treatment. The implementation of combined clinics provides a cost-reducing avenue in the management of dermatologic disease and psychosocial comorbidity by limiting inaccurate diagnoses, ineffective treatments, unnecessary referrals, and “doctor shopping.” Increased patient satisfaction or improved patient outcomes after the use of holistic treatment with pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic therapies was reported by 20 included studies (87%).

Conclusions and Relevance  Examined data from the included clinics illuminate the increased need and demand for specialized care. The ability to provide high-quality integrative patient care, potential utility in medical education, and findings of reduced health care expenditures reflect the need for health care leaders to expand specialized care as key for moving forward. Practical clinic models consist of a well-informed dermatologist for identification of psychocutaneous disease, referral if needed, and treatment based on the physician’s individual comfort level. Involvement of multiple specialists, including psychiatrists, psychologists, and residents and preferably within teaching institutions, in consultations and management-related discussions is recommended.

Limit 200 characters
Limit 25 characters
Conflicts of Interest Disclosure

Identify all potential conflicts of interest that might be relevant to your comment.

Conflicts of interest comprise financial interests, activities, and relationships within the past 3 years including but not limited to employment, affiliation, grants or funding, consultancies, honoraria or payment, speaker's bureaus, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, royalties, donation of medical equipment, or patents planned, pending, or issued.

Err on the side of full disclosure.

If you have no conflicts of interest, check "No potential conflicts of interest" in the box below. The information will be posted with your response.

Not all submitted comments are published. Please see our commenting policy for details.

Limit 140 characters
Limit 3600 characters or approximately 600 words