To the Editor Although we appreciate the efforts of Pournamdari et al1 to highlight areas of overuse in the field of dermatology, we were greatly surprised that 2 of the selected topics were reexcision of (severely) dysplastic nevi (DN) and sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy for cutaneous melanoma, given the limited data supporting their conclusions. Instead of a comprehensive literature review on a specific topic, the authors chose 10 articles on 6 distinct topics, drawing conclusions without the context of other existing literature. The authors gave only 1 of the 10 studies an A for quality of evidence; 5 were rated B, and 4 were rated C.1
Identify all potential conflicts of interest that might be relevant to your comment.
Conflicts of interest comprise financial interests, activities, and relationships within the past 3 years including but not limited to employment, affiliation, grants or funding, consultancies, honoraria or payment, speaker's bureaus, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, royalties, donation of medical equipment, or patents planned, pending, or issued.
Err on the side of full disclosure.
If you have no conflicts of interest, check "No potential conflicts of interest" in the box below. The information will be posted with your response.
Not all submitted comments are published. Please see our commenting policy for details.
Chu EY, Stein JA, Ming ME. Evaluation of the Merits and Limitations of Evidence-Based Medicine. JAMA Dermatol. Published online June 24, 2020. doi:10.1001/jamadermatol.2020.1940
Coronavirus Resource Center
Customize your JAMA Network experience by selecting one or more topics from the list below.
Create a personal account or sign in to: