[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Citations 0
April 1999

Chronic Actinic Dermatitis Is Not a Viable Concept

Author Affiliations

Copyright 1999 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved. Applicable FARS/DFARS Restrictions Apply to Government Use.1999

Arch Dermatol. 1999;135(4):469-a-470. doi:10-1001/pubs.Arch Dermatol.-ISSN-0003-987x-135-4-dlt0499

The term "chronic actinic dermatitis" (CAD), coined by Hawk and Magnus,1 is used synonymously with the term "photosensitivity dermatitis/actinic reticuloid syndrome" coined by Frain-Bell and colleagues.2 Chronic actinic dermatitis encompasses 4 diagnoses: actinic reticuloid, photosensitive eczema, photosensitivity dermatitis, and more recently, persistent light reactivity,3 originally described as distinct disorders but generally accepted as variants of CAD. Burry4 questions the validity of the term CAD and the concept of a unifying diagnosis. In particular, he suggests that diagnostic errors will be made and diagnoses of airborne contact dermatitis (particularly Compositae dermatitis), photoallergic contact dermatitis, and allergy to photosensitizing medication will be missed and managed inappropriately.4 This is not the case.