[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
October 2001

Is Dermoscopy Useful for the Diagnosis of Melanoma?

Author Affiliations

Copyright 2001 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved. Applicable FARS/DFARS Restrictions Apply to Government Use.2001

Arch Dermatol. 2001;137(10):1361-1363. doi:10.1001/archderm.137.10.1361

IN 1985, at the Annual Meeting of the Austrian Society of Dermatology in Vienna, when giving a lecture on dermoscopy—at that time we used the term incident light microscopy—one of us (H.P.S.) was faced immediately with 2 queries: (1) Is dermoscopy really better than naked-eye examination for the diagnosis of melanoma? (2) Will dermoscopy ever be reimbursed? To answer the second question first: yes, dermoscopy has been reimbursed in Austria since 1987. The colleague asking this question was the person who later negotiated with the Austrian Gebietskrankenkasse and convinced them that dermoscopy should be reimbursed because it represents an innovative clinical method with benefits to individuals at risk for developing melanoma, in particular those with numerous acquired melanocytic nevi.