[Skip to Content]
[Skip to Content Landing]
Correspondence
January 2002

A Copy Editor Has No Right to Distort an Author's Meaning

Author Affiliations
 

Copyright 2002 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved. Applicable FARS/DFARS Restrictions Apply to Government Use.2002

Arch Dermatol. 2002;138(1):125-126. doi:10.1001/archderm.138.1.125

In my letter to the editor in the May 2001 issue of the ARCHIVES,1 the crux of my thesis was set forth in a single sentence that, when written by me and sent off to the ARCHIVES, read as follows: "But some colleagues disposed favorably to dermatologic surgery, I among them, are concerned about a distressing trend in that field to cosmetology and to the failure of leaders like Drs Brody and Coleman to decry it." A copy editor for the ARCHIVES took the liberty of changing the sentence to read thus: "But some colleagues disposed favorably to dermatologic surgery, I among them, are concerned about a distressing trend in that field to the name cosmetology and to the failure of leaders like Drs Brody and Coleman to decry it."

×