[Skip to Navigation]
May 1925


Author Affiliations

Department of Anatomy, Stanford Medical School STANFORD UNIVERSITY, CALIF.

Arch Derm Syphilol. 1925;11(5):637-653. doi:10.1001/archderm.1925.02370050060004

This article is only available in the PDF format. Download the PDF to view the article, as well as its associated figures and tables.


II. THE HAIR OF MAMMALS  All kinds of mammalian hair have sufficient similarity to justify the belief that they have had a common phylogenetic origin. Whether hairs were originally protective or sensory has frequently been discussed, but there is considerable likelihood that at first they were neither wholly the one nor the other. Among living mammals, the protective function of hair is obvious, and at the same time there can be no doubt that many hairs, particularly the highly specialized tactile ones, play an important rôle in sense perception. The wide gaps that exist, for example, between movable sensory hairs and fine down or coarse spines are bridged by intermediate forms. That one or another of the various types of hair represents the persistence of an unmodified remnant from the covering of an early mammalian prototype, is not supported by adequate evidence. In the light of what knowledge we have,

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview
Add or change institution