[Skip to Navigation]
Article
June 1954

DERMATOLOGICAL DESCRIPTION

Author Affiliations

711 Bushwick Ave. Brooklyn, N. Y.

AMA Arch Derm Syphilol. 1954;69(6):747. doi:10.1001/archderm.1954.01540180097019

This article is only available in the PDF format. Download the PDF to view the article, as well as its associated figures and tables.

Abstract

To the Editor:—Any suggestions aimed at the simplification of dermatologic nomenclature or description would be welcome. I am therefore submitting the following suggestions:

When describing a dermatosis as "secondarily infected" or "impetiginized," why not simply insert the prefix "pyo" before the diagnosis? e. g.: pyocontact dermatitis; or pyoseborrheic dermatitis; or pyoeczema.

Also, when there is absorption from the primary site, or autosensitization, one can simply insert the suffix "id." e.g.: contact dermatid; or seborrheic dermatid; or eczematid.

When both secondary infection and absorption phenomena are present, one can simply state: pyocontact dermatid; or pyoseborrheic dermatid; or pyoeczematid.

We are thereby enabled to convey in one word, or simply by the addition of one or two syllables, a definite dermatologic picture.

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview
Add or change institution
×