This article is only available in the PDF format. Download the PDF to view the article, as well as its associated figures and tables.
To the Editor.—My recent note on the nomenclature of cellular nevi was intentionally brief; so brief, I fear, that it seemed to imply a lack of respect for Dr. Traub's important contribution to our understanding of these lesions. I vividly recall the first case of growing nevi (intraepidermal, junction, or compound, depending on the plane of the section) I ever encountered, while I was in training, in 1938. It was regarded as so remarkable and puzzling as to be worth reporting, and was reported (Arnold, H. L., Jr.: Multiple Pigmented Nevi: Report of a Case, Arch. Dermat. & Syph. 40:386-389 [Sept.] 1939). Today this case would be regarded—thanks to Dr. Traub's publications on the classification of these lesions—as utterly commonplace.
A morphologic classification is a valuable advance, in that it defines terms and permits communication of ideas. If a biologic classification can develop out of it, however
Arnold HL. SIMPLIFIED NOMENCLATURE FOR NEVI. AMA Arch Derm Syphilol. 1954;70(3):366. doi:10.1001/archderm.1954.01540210105021
Customize your JAMA Network experience by selecting one or more topics from the list below.