[Skip to Navigation]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 35.153.100.128. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
Article
July 1956

Diphenhydramine Hydrochloride as a Local Anesthetic Agent

Author Affiliations

Covina, Calif.; Los Angeles

From the Department of Dermatology, University of Southern California, Maximilian E. Obermayer, Director; and the Section of Dermatology, Los Angeles County General Hospital, Maximilian E. Obermayer and Maxwell J. Wolff, Co-chairmen.

AMA Arch Derm. 1956;74(1):76-79. doi:10.1001/archderm.1956.01550070078015
Abstract

Introduction

Minor surgical procedures are occasionally necessary for patients who have either a known sensitivity to procaine or who obtain little or no anesthesia from it. It was felt that a substitute drug of a different chemical structure would be of definite value. One of the physiologic properties of the antihistamines is that of local anesthesia.1 It was therefore decided to proceed with a clinical investigation of one of them, diphenhydramine hydrochloride (Benadryl) as a local anesthetic.

Review of the Literature

Rosenthal and Minard2 noticed in 1939 that thymoxyethyldiethylamine produced local anesthesia to the same extent as but of longer duration than 1% procaine (Novocaine) when injected intracutaneously or applied locally to the denuded skin in 0.5% concentration. Burchell and Varco3 noted that blebs produced in the human skin by the intracutaneous injection of either thymoxyethyldiethylamine or N′ethyl-N′-diethylaminoethylaniline were anesthetic only over

×