This article is only available in the PDF format. Download the PDF to view the article, as well as its associated figures and tables.
To The Editor:—
The paper, "Dermatological Nomenclature," by S. W. Becker, which was delivered before, and discussed by, an exclusive audience is now (A.M.A. Arch. Dermat. 80:778 [Dec.] 1959) in the realm of general debate. I would like to make some points.Assuming that a standardized nomenclature of skin diseases is desirable and feasible, how can it be achieved if we do not have a complete dictionary of all dermatologic words, terms, and phrases in current use? It is even necessary for reference to have a record of the terminology of the past in such a repository because one never knows if and when the value of a word vanishes completely. There are agents who could produce such a work but there are no agencies wise enough or rich enough to support the production of it. Nothing points up the absolute desideratum of a specialized dermatologic dictionary as the mistakes
Leider M. RE: STANDARD NOMENCLATURE. Arch Dermatol. 1960;82(2):276–277. doi:10.1001/archderm.1960.01580020118033
Customize your JAMA Network experience by selecting one or more topics from the list below.
Create a personal account or sign in to: