This article is only available in the PDF format. Download the PDF to view the article, as well as its associated figures and tables.
To the Editor:
It has been pointed out to me that there is a sentence in the paper of mine in the April issue of the Archives (Blank, I. H., and Dawes, R. K.: A.M.A. Arch. Dermat. 81:565, 1960) which is wrong scientifically. This is the last complete sentence on page 565. It reads, "Since the net negative charge on protein increases on the acid side of its isoelectrical point, one might expect combination with aluminum to increase as the pH decreases." This sentence should read as follows:Since the net negative charge on a protein decreases as the protein is acidified, one might expect combination with the positively charged aluminum ion to decrease as the pH decreases.Sincerely yours,
Blank IH. ANTIBACTERIAL ACTIVITY OF WEAK SOLUTIONS OF ALUMINUM SALTS. Arch Dermatol. 1960;82(3):428. doi:10.1001/archderm.1960.01580030122025
Coronavirus Resource Center
Customize your JAMA Network experience by selecting one or more topics from the list below.
Create a personal account or sign in to: