[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 35.153.39.7. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Correspondence
April 1962

REPLY TO COMMENTS ON LICHEN PLANUS-Reply

Author Affiliations

Mayo Clinic Rochester, Minn.

Arch Dermatol. 1962;85(4):542. doi:10.1001/archderm.1962.01590040106024

This article is only available in the PDF format. Download the PDF to view the article, as well as its associated figures and tables.

Abstract

To the Editor:  In regard to the follicular keratotic lesions of lichen planus, histologically we can only say that in our very limited experience with this group, these may be histologically nonspecific.Merely to answer the question of the number of patients below the age of 15, we did not record the patients in this manner, but rather we recorded 10 patients between the ages of 10 and 19.We are aware of the opinion expressed by some (but not necessarily accepted by all dermatologists) that lichen nitidus might be a form of lichen planus. Since our paper was intended to review the variations and course of lichen planus, we did not wish to express an opinion on this controversial subject.

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview
×