This article is only available in the PDF format. Download the PDF to view the article, as well as its associated figures and tables.
There is an error in Dr. Ayres' Discussion on the article "Further Studies With Topical 5-Fluorouracil," by C. J. Dillaha et al, in the October issue of the Archives. On page 416, right-hand column, the sentence starting on line 12 should read as follows:
"It is only occasionally [in the case of men] that the prophylactic benefits are sufficient to counterbalance the unsightliness of the permanent hypopigmentation of planed or chemical cauterant treated areas, or both, in contrast to heavily sun-tanned or freckled adjacent areas."
ERRATUM. Arch Dermatol. 1966;93(2):220. doi:10.1001/archderm.1966.01600200076012
Coronavirus Resource Center
Customize your JAMA Network experience by selecting one or more topics from the list below.
Create a personal account or sign in to: