[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
March 1970


Author Affiliations

445 S Federal Hwy Boca Raton, Fla 33432

Arch Dermatol. 1970;101(3):370. doi:10.1001/archderm.1970.04000030114026

This article is only available in the PDF format. Download the PDF to view the article, as well as its associated figures and tables.


To the Editor.—  Dr. Kocsard's comments concerning our article "Elastotic Nodules of the Antihelix" were appreciated and after reviewing the references mentioned, I would like to reemphasize the described nodules were semitranslucent with granular white-to-pink aggregates below an "orange-peel" surface. This is in contrast to the diffuse yellow nodules of obvious actinic damage.We found nodules of this particular color and morphology only on the anterior crus of the antihelix. Since the anterior crus is relatively protected from exposure by the helix and carcinoma is rare at this site, we felt the increasing prominence of the cartilage was a unique factor. Dr. Kocsard supports the thinking that the cartilage plays a role, however, we favor a mechanical rather than inflammatory etiology.Naming such an entity as "elastotic nodules of the anterior crus and the antihelix" has its owns problems.

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview