This article is only available in the PDF format. Download the PDF to view the article, as well as its associated figures and tables.
To the Editor.
Concerning the article by Shmunes and Shu entitled, "Bullous Disease of Childhood: Report of a Case Demonstrating Antibasal Cell Antibody," which appeared in the March 1977 Archives (113:325-327), what kind of cell is an antibasal cell? I assume it is a cell found at the "anti-base." Certainly the authors meant anti-basal-cell antibody, which clearly indicates an antibody against the basal cell.Such hyphenations are useful. Compare "a large comedo-extractor" with "a large-comedo extractor." Compare "I saw a man eating tiger" with "I saw a man-eating tiger." The meanings are quite different. Thus, in the article by Shmunes and Shu, on page 326, the fourth line of the "Comment" section should read: "drug-related eruptions," and line 6 should read: "drug-induced."Small details, perhaps, but I do think that precision begets clarity, and both are important.Readers are advised that in view of The Copyright Revision Act of 1976,
Spatz SA. Man Eating Tiger? Arch Dermatol. 1978;114(1):125. doi:10.1001/archderm.1978.01640130083027
Browse and subscribe to JAMA Network podcasts!
Customize your JAMA Network experience by selecting one or more topics from the list below.
Create a personal account or sign in to: