This article is only available in the PDF format. Download the PDF to view the article, as well as its associated figures and tables.
To the Editor.—
Dr Philip C. Anderson of Columbia, Mo, in an editorial comment (Archives 113:1066, 1977) stated: "Our principal defense against the major intrusion of government into dermatology is to manage our specialty not merely well, but in a sophisticated, progressive, and very humane fashion." This sentence implies that dermatologists are not properly managing their own specialty. This is further supported by his statement: "We have only started on the difficult road to managing our specialty properly and serving our patients expertly."I personally feel that these statements are entirely untrue. Dermatologists, as a whole, have been handling their specialty quite properly and have been dispensing skillful treatment to their patients. The excellent programs at the American Academy of Dermatology attest to the sophistication of the broad scope of our field.Dermatologists do not have to prepare a defense to combat the intrusion of federal government but merely let
Samuelson JS. Dermatologists vs the Federal Government. Arch Dermatol. 1978;114(7):1095–1096. doi:10.1001/archderm.1978.01640190073036
Browse and subscribe to JAMA Network podcasts!
Customize your JAMA Network experience by selecting one or more topics from the list below.
Create a personal account or sign in to: