This article is only available in the PDF format. Download the PDF to view the article, as well as its associated figures and tables.
The communications received on my book review have been astounding; they have attracted more attention than the book. In response to Dr Blank, that was not vitriol that oozed from my pen, but academic tears that salinated the article in genuine sorrow over an academic job poorly done. Scholarship is not stringing together a MEDLARS search of the literature in book form (a determined resident could do that). It is not a perfunctory, student-level description of anatomy and physiology, nor is it a bare-bones catalogue of scalp disorders. And certainly it is not a bland collection of uninformative pictures. This "encyclopedic compendium" would not pass as scholarship at Berkeley or Cambridge, Mass, nor here on Mt Parnassus, and I doubt if it would draw a crowd on Broadway (New York and/or San Francisco). Nevertheless, it should sell well because mediocrity abounds and few practicing dermatologists have taken the time to
Epstein W. Hair: The Book-Reply. Arch Dermatol. 1984;120(10):1280–1281. doi:10.1001/archderm.1984.01650460020008
Coronavirus Resource Center
Customize your JAMA Network experience by selecting one or more topics from the list below.
Create a personal account or sign in to: