To the Editor.—
I read with interest the report by Samlaska et al1 in the January issue of the Archives, describing a patient with a novel pattern of scalp hair growth. I found the description fascinating and the discussion informative, but wish to offer two comments. The first (and admittedly this is a matter of opinion or philosophy) is to question the wisdom of the name chosen, the ridgeback anomaly. While the analogy to the Rhodesian ridgeback dog may be apt, it can also have derogatory connotations to patients and their families. As physicians, we should not add the burden of the name to the burden of the disease. Second, I would take issue with the authors' statement that "genetic causes can be excluded in this patient, based on history." First, we are not told whether the hair patterns described as normal in the parents, one sibling, three offspring,
Williams ML. The Ridgeback Anomaly. Arch Dermatol. 1989;125(8):1144. doi:10.1001/archderm.1989.01670200120022
Coronavirus Resource Center
Customize your JAMA Network experience by selecting one or more topics from the list below.
Create a personal account or sign in to: