Reliability and Validity of a Photographic Method for Measuring Facial Hair Density in Men | Dermatology | JAMA Dermatology | JAMA Network
[Skip to Navigation]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 18.204.227.34. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
1.
Chamberlain AJ, Dawber RP. Methods of evaluating hair growth.  Australas J Dermatol. 2003;44(1):10-1812581076PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
2.
Hamzavi I, Tan E, Shapiro J, Lui H. A randomized bilateral vehicle-controlled study of eflornithine cream combined with laser treatment versus laser treatment alone for facial hirsutism in women.  J Am Acad Dermatol. 2007;57(1):54-5917270315PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
3.
Shrout PE, Fleiss JL. Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability.  Psychol Bull. 1979;86(2):420-42818839484PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
4.
Price VH, Menefee E, Strauss PC. Changes in hair weight and hair count in men with androgenetic alopecia, after application of 5% and 2% topical minoxidil, placebo, or no treatment.  J Am Acad Dermatol. 1999;41(5, pt 1):717-72110534633PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
5.
Van Neste D, Tr üeb RM. Critical study of hair growth analysis with computer-assisted methods.  J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2006;20(5):578-58316684287PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Research Letter
Nov 2011

Reliability and Validity of a Photographic Method for Measuring Facial Hair Density in Men

Author Affiliations

Author Affiliations: Departments of Dermatology (Mss Wan and Steinemann and Drs Abuabara, Kurd, Musiek, Vittorio, and Gelfand) and Internal Medicine (Drs Abuabara and Kurd) and Center for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics (Dr Gelfand), University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia; and Philadelphia VA Medical Center, Philadelphia (Dr Musiek). Dr Musiek is now with the Department of Dermatology, Washington University, St Louis, Missouri; Ms Steinemann is now with Drexel University College of Medicine, Philadelphia.

Arch Dermatol. 2011;147(11):1328-1329. doi:10.1001/archdermatol.2011.332

Many studies have investigated hair removal or growth prevention treatments, but they often measure hair density using noninvasive methods that are subjective and qualitative.1 Although photographic and digital hair-counting methods have been used, their reliability and validity remain unknown.2 We describe a simple, noninvasive method of hair counting used in a hair growth prevention treatment trial and assess its reliability and validity.

The data are from the first 14 healthy men consecutively enrolled in a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial of a topical agent for hair growth prevention. Eligible subjects were required to shave at least once daily to avoid a beard with hair length visible above the skin line and to have a baseline physician global assessment (PGA) score for hair density of 4 or 5 in the beard area. The PGA was developed by us for the larger clinical trial as a visual analog scale for rating hair density by overall impression (Figure).

×