[Skip to Navigation]
Sign In
Observation
January 2014

Sibling Cases of Hailey-Hailey Disease Showing Atypical Clinical Features and Unique Disease Course

Author Affiliations
  • 1Department of Dermatology, Mito Saiseikai General Hospital, Mito, Ibaraki, Japan
  • 2Department of Dermatology, Kurume University School of Medicine, and Kurume University Institute of Cutaneous Cell Biology, Kurume, Fukuoka, Japan
JAMA Dermatol. 2014;150(1):97-99. doi:10.1001/jamadermatol.2013.5666

Hailey-Hailey disease (HHD), a well-characterized autosomal dominant hereditary disease, is caused by mutation in ATP2C1 gene and clinically shows characteristic erosive lesions predominantly on the intertriginous areas.1-3 We herein report sibling cases of HHD with novel mutations in the ATP2C1 gene that showed unique and atypical clinical phenotypes mimicking seborrheic dermatitis, pemphigus vulgaris, or pemphigus foliaceus as well as considerable alterations during the disease course.

Report of Cases

Case 1

A 61-year-old Japanese man with intractable pulmonary arterial hypertension, pulmonary fibrosis, and emphysema was receiving oxygen supply from a nasal tube at the time of presentation. Physical examination revealed seborrheic dermatitis–like diffuse scaly erythemas on the face and anterior neck, where the nasal tube of the oxygen supply contacted the skin (Figure 1A). In addition, extensive erosive erythemas with severe pain were seen on the abdomen, and a few pemphigus vulgaris—like flaccid bullae were also observed (Figure 1B). No skin lesions were seen in any intertriginous areas, including axillae and groin. No mucosal membranes were involved. Detailed medical history indicated that, beginning at age 19 years, the patient had occasional mild eczematous lesions on the axillae, groin, popliteal fossa, and head.

Figure 1.  Clinical and Histopathologic Features of Case 1 and Case 2 at the First Visit
Clinical and Histopathologic Features of Case 1 and Case 2 at the First Visit

A and B, Skin lesions on the neck (A) and abdomen (B) in case 1. Clinical features on the neck in case 2 (C). D and E, Histopathologic features (hematoxylin-eosin) from the abdomen in case 1 (D, original magnification ×100) and the neck in case 2 (E, original magnification ×200)

Case 2

A 57-year-old younger sister of patient 1 reported that, beginning at age 20 years, she had developed dermatitis-like skin lesions on the genital region during menstrual periods. Subsequently, itchy erosive lesions appeared on the axillae and groin, which worsened in the summer every year. The skin lesions on the axillae and groin gradually decreased, while skin lesions on the face, neck, and chest continued to develop.

Physical examination revealed erythemas with small erosions scattered on the forehead, neck, chest, and upper back (Figure 1C) but not on the intertriginous areas, except for minimum lesions on the left axilla. There were no apparent vesicles or bullae.

Comment

Histopathologic analysis of the seborrheic dermatitis–like lesion and pemphigus vulgaris–like lesion in case 1 and pemphigus foliaceus–like lesion in case 2 revealed acantholysis without any dyskeratotic keratinocytes in the lower epidermis (Figure 1D and E). Indirect immunofluorescence studies showed IgG antibodies to epithelia of monkey esophagus and rat bladder in case 1 (Figure 2A and B), but no conclusive pattern was seen in case 2. Genetic study revealed a novel splice-site mutation in the ATP2C1 gene in both cases (Figure 2C).

Figure 2.  The Results of Immunologic and Genetic Studies for Case 1
The Results of Immunologic and Genetic Studies for Case 1

A and B, The results of IgG indirect immunofluorescence studies of monkey esophagus (A) and rat bladder (B) (original magnification ×200 for both). C, The results of ATP2C1 gene analysis of genomic DNA for case 1 (top) and healthy control individual (bottom), showing a heterozygous G>C transition at first residue in intron 11 only in the patient (down-pointing arrow).

The 2 cases were diagnosed as HHD by identification of a novel mutation in the ATP2C1 gene. However, while both patients showed more typical HHD features when they were younger, as they aged into their 60s, they manifested atypical clinical features and unique disease courses. Intriguingly, the clinical features in the 2 cases were significantly different from each other, in spite of the presence of the same genomic mutation. Taking the changes in clinical features during the disease courses of the 2 cases together, we speculate that some environmental conditions, in addition to the genetic defect, may affect the development of skin lesions of HHD.

A study of 58 patients with HHD in the United Kingdom2 indicated that predilection sites were the flexure areas, including the groin, axilla, perineum, inframammary region, umbilicus, and retroauricular region, in descending order, as well as neck/nape, shoulders, chest, arms, and back.2 The abdomen was not involved in any cases. Only a few cases showed lesions on the popliteal fossae, head, and face, which were frequently associated with eczematous changes but rarely showed bullae or pustules.

Two clinically unique and atypical HHD cases have been reported,4,5 although genetic study was not performed in either case. One case showed seborrheic dermatitis–like lesions on the scalp as well as other typical HHD lesions,4 while the other case showed generalized vesiculobullous lesions with occasional pustules.5 To our knowledge, our patients represent the first sibling cases with seborrheic dermatitis–like, pemphigus vulgaris–like, or pemphigus foliaceus–like atypical clinical and histopathologic features of HHD diagnosed by genetic analysis.

Back to top
Article Information

Corresponding Author: Takashi Hashimoto, MD, Department of Dermatology, Kurume University School of Medicine and Kurume University Institute of Cutaneous Cell Biology, 67 Asahimachi, Kurume, Fukuoka 830-0011, Japan (hashimot@med.kurume-u.ac.jp).

Published Online: December 18, 2013. doi:10.1001/jamadermatol.2013.5666.

Conflicts of Interest Disclosures: None reported.

Funding/Support: This study was supported by Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research Nos. 20390308, 20591331, 21659271, 23591634, 23791298, 23791299, 23791300, 23791301, 24659534, 24591672, 24591640, 24791185, and 22590543 and by Supported Program for the Strategic Research Foundation at Private Universities 2011-2015 from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology; and by Research on Measures for Intractable Diseases Project matching fund subsidies “H23-028 (K. Iwatsuki)” and “H24-038 (T. Hamada)” from the Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare. The study was also supported by grants from the Kaibara Morikazu Medical Science Promotion Foundation, Ishibashi Foundation, Kanae Foundation for the Promotion of Medical Science, Takeda Science Foundation, Chuo Mitsui Trust and Banking Company, Limited, and Nakatomi Foundation.

Role of the Sponsor: The sponsors had no role in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, or interpretation of the data; preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript; and decision to submit the manuscript for publication.

References
1.
Hamada  T, Tsuruta  D, Fukuda  S,  et al.  How do keratinizing disorders and blistering disorders overlap?  Exp Dermatol. 2013;22(2):83-87.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
2.
Burge  SM.  Hailey-Hailey disease: the clinical features, response to treatment and prognosis.  Br J Dermatol. 1992;126(3):275-282.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
3.
Hu  Z, Bonifas  JM, Beech  J,  et al.  Mutations in ATP2C1, encoding a calcium pump, cause Hailey-Hailey disease.  Nat Genet. 2000;24(1):61-65.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
4.
Marren  P, Burge  S.  Seborrhoeic dermatitis of the scalp: a manifestation of Hailey-Hailey disease in a predisposed individual?  Br J Dermatol. 1992;126(3):294-296.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
5.
Hunt  MJ, Salisbury  EL, Painter  DM, Lee  S.  Vesiculobullous Hailey-Hailey disease: successful treatment with oral retinoids.  Australas J Dermatol. 1996;37(4):196-198.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
×