Prevalence of Self-reported Skin Complaints and Avoidance of Common Daily Life Consumer Products in Selected European Regions | Allergy and Clinical Immunology | JAMA Dermatology | JAMA Network
[Skip to Navigation]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 34.239.150.57. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
1.
Wolkenstein  P, Grob  JJ, Bastuji-Garin  S, Ruszczynski  S, Roujeau  JC, Revuz  J; Société Française de Dermotologie.  French people and skin diseases: results of a survey using a representative sample.  Arch Dermatol. 2003;139(12):1614-1619.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
2.
Dalgard  F, Svensson  A, Holm  JO, Sundby  J.  Self-reported skin morbidity in Oslo: associations with sociodemographic factors among adults in a cross-sectional study.  Br J Dermatol. 2004;151(2):452-457.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
3.
Scholfield  JK, Grindlay  D, Williams  HC.  Skin Conditions in the UK: A Health Needs Assessment. Nottingham, England: Centre of Evidence Based Dermatology, University of Nottingham; 2009.
4.
Vos  T, Flaxman  AD, Naghavi  M,  et al.  Years lived with disability (YLDs) for 1160 sequelae of 289 diseases and injuries 1990-2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010.  Lancet. 2012;380(9859):2163-2196.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
5.
Johansen  JD, Andersen  TF, Thomsen  LK, Kjøller  M, Menné  T.  Rash related to use of scented products: a questionnaire study in the Danish population: is the problem increasing?  Contact Dermatitis. 2000;42(4):222-226.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
6.
Trattner  A, Slodownik  D, Jbarah  A, Ingber  A.  Questionnaire study of the prevalence of allergic contact dermatitis from cosmetics in Israel.  Dermatitis. 2009;20(5):284-286.PubMedGoogle Scholar
7.
Berardesca  E, Farage  M, Maibach  H.  Sensitive skin: an overview.  Int J Cosmet Sci. 2013;35(1):2-8.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
8.
Misery  L, Boussetta  S, Nocera  T, Perez-Cullell  N, Taieb  C.  Sensitive skin in Europe.  J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2009;23(4):376-381.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
9.
Rossi  M, Coenraads  PJ, Diepgen  T,  et al.  Design and feasibility of an international study assessing the prevalence of contact allergy to fragrances in the general population: the European Dermato-Epidemiology Network Fragrance Study.  Dermatology. 2010;221(3):267-275.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
10.
Calkin  RR, Jellinek  JS.  Perfumes for functional products.  In:  Perfumery: Practice and Principles. New York, NY: Wiley-Interscience; 1994:143-152.Google Scholar
11.
Brown  LD, Cai  TT, DasGupta  A.  Interval estimation for a binomial proportion.  Stat Sci. 2001;16:101-133.PubMedGoogle Scholar
12.
European Commission. Eurostat: your key to European statistics. http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/portal/page/portal/population/data/database. Accessed November 4, 2013.
13.
Ahmad  OB, Boschi-Pinto  C, Lopez  AD, Murray  CJL, Lozano  R, Inoue  M.  Age Standardization of Rates: A New WHO Standard. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2001.PubMed
14.
Halvorsen  JA, Braae Olesen  A, Thoresen  M, Holm  JØ, Bjertness  E, Dalgard  F.  Comparison of self-reported skin complaints with objective skin signs among adolescents.  Acta Derm Venereol. 2008;88(6):573-577.PubMedGoogle Scholar
15.
Stenberg  B, Meding  B, Svensson  A.  Dermatology in public health: a model for surveillance of common skin diseases.  Scand J Public Health. 2010;38(4):368-374.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
16.
Huang  MJ, Li  J, Liff  JM, Cohen  DE, Cone  J.  Self-reported skin rash or irritation symptoms among World Trade Center Health Registry participants.  J Occup Environ Med. 2012;54(4):451-458.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
17.
Rogalski  C, Simon  J, Paasch  U.  Health economics studies in dermatology.  Hautarzt. 2006;57(4):297-302.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Original Investigation
February 2014

Prevalence of Self-reported Skin Complaints and Avoidance of Common Daily Life Consumer Products in Selected European Regions

Author Affiliations
  • 1Department of Dermatology, Azienda Ospedaliera Papa Giovanni XXIII, Bergamo, Centro Studi Gruppo Italiano Studi Epidemiologici in Dermatologia–Fondazione per la Ricerca Ospedale Maggiore Presidio Ospedaliero Matteo Rota, Bergamo, Italy
  • 2Centro Studi Gruppo Italiano Studi Epidemiologici in Dermatologia–Fondazione per la Ricerca Ospedale Maggiore Presidio Ospedaliero Matteo Rota, Bergamo, Italy
  • 3Department of Dermatology, Coimbra University Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal
  • 4Department of Social Medicine, University Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
  • 5Department of Occupational and Environmental Dermatology, University Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
  • 6Department of Occupational and Environmental Dermatology, University Hospital, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden
  • 7Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Jena, Jena, Germany
  • 8Department of Dermatology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
  • 9Department of Dermatology, Institute of Clinical Research in Malmö, Skåne University Hospital, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden
  • 10Department of Epidemiology, Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri, Scientific Institute for Research, Hospitalization, and Health Care, Milan, Italy
JAMA Dermatol. 2014;150(2):154-163. doi:10.1001/jamadermatol.2013.7932
Abstract

Importance  Skin disorders are common in the general population, and they may be associated with significant disability. The use of daily skin products may affect the appearance and severity of skin conditions.

Objectives  To assess the prevalence of reported itchy rash lasting longer than 3 days among the general population and to evaluate lifetime avoidance of different types of consumer products because of skin problems.

Design, Setting, and Participants  The European Dermato-Epidemiology Network (EDEN) Fragrance Study comprised a large descriptive epidemiological survey of the general population conducted in 6 European regions from August 20, 2008, to October 10, 2011. Participants were a random sample of individuals aged 18 to 74 years, based on electoral precincts. The participants were interviewed using a standardized questionnaire.

Exposures  Lifetime exposure to products of common use was considered, including toiletry items that remained on the skin or were rinsed off and household and functional items.

Main Outcomes and Measures  The 1-month, 1-year, and lifetime age-standardized prevalence rates of itchy rash that lasted longer than 3 days.

Results  In total, 12 377 individuals (53.9% female; median age, 43 years) were interviewed. The overall prevalences of itchy rash were 19.3% (95% CI, 18.6%-20.0%) during the month preceding the interview, 31.8% (95% CI, 31.0%-32.6%) during the preceding year, and 51.7% (95% CI, 50.8%-52.6%) over a lifetime. In addition, the percentage of individuals who reported avoidance of any product varied from 37.0% for products intended to be left on the skin to 17.7% for household or functional products.

Conclusions and Relevance  Our findings confirmed the magnitude of skin problems among the general population reported in other surveys. Although itchy rash is a nonspecific manifestation, it may be considered in epidemiological surveys to reflect a constellation of skin conditions and to summarize the burden of these conditions on general health.

×