[Skip to Navigation]
Sign In
Case Report/Case Series
October 2014

BRAFV600E Mutation Status of Involuting and Stable Nevi in Dabrafenib Therapy With or Without Trametinib

Author Affiliations
  • 1Dermatology Research Centre, The University of Queensland, School of Medicine, Translational Research Institute, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
  • 2The University of Queensland, Institute for Molecular Biosciences, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
  • 3Medical Oncology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Wooloongabba, Queensland, Australia
  • 4The University of Queensland, Translational Research Institute, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
  • 5IQ Pathology, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
JAMA Dermatol. 2014;150(10):1079-1082. doi:10.1001/jamadermatol.2014.436

Importance  Recent advances in targeting BRAFV600E mutations, which occur in roughly 50% of melanomas and 70% of benign nevi, have improved response rates and survival in patients with melanoma. With increased survival, the importance of other comorbidities increases and requires consideration in long-term management. This case report discusses dynamic dermoscopic nevus changes that occur during dabrafenib therapy and offers some conclusions regarding BRAF mutations and the changes.

Observations  A man in his 30s had been monitored with whole-body dermoscopy at roughly 7-month intervals as part of a nevus surveillance study. Fourteen months after his initial visit, metastases were found, and the patient entered a clinical trial of dabrafenib with or without trametinib therapy. Continued dermoscopic monitoring for the next 12 months revealed that approximately 50% of the existing acquired melanocytic nevi involuted, while the remaining nevi did not change. Biopsy findings from 1 unchanged and 1 involuted nevus showed BRAF wild type in the unchanged nevus, BRAFV600E mutation in the involuting nevus, and no malignant histopathologic characteristics in either one.

Conclusions and Relevance  Our observations indicate that a previously suggested hypothesis regarding involuting nevi in BRAF inhibitor therapy is correct: Nevi that involute while a patient is undergoing BRAF V600E inhibitor therapy possess the BRAF V600E mutation, while others that grow or remain unchanged are wild type. However larger-scale trials are required to gather conclusive data and create a more complete clinical picture.

Melanocytes, like many other human cells, express the BRAF gene. However, mutation of BRAF in melanocytes occurs at high frequency in melanocytic proliferations such as nevi (70%-82%) and melanomas (50%-60%).1,2 Mutation of BRAF results in a defect of the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway causing oncogenic proliferation and avoidance of apoptosis.3 Most frequently, BRAF mutations occur at the V600E position (74%-90%), and the next most common mutation occurs at V600K (16%-29%)4; together, these sites account for 95% of all BRAF mutations.

Initial breakthrough treatments were made with vemurafenib, a selective inhibitor of BRAFV600E-mutated kinase. The inhibition of BRAFV600E initially induces tumor growth arrest and partial or complete tumor regression in metastatic melanoma.5 Given the frequency of BRAFV600E mutations in benign nevi,2 it is also not surprising that changes have been observed in existing melanocytic nevi and that new nevi appear during BRAFV600E inhibitor therapy.6,7 Recently, a study of 42 patients treated with vemurafenib for a mean duration of 6.7 months described a high level of dermoscopic change in preexisting lesions such as color changes, appearance and disappearance of globules, dermoscopic island pigmentation, and increases in size of nevi.8 New primary melanomas have also been reported during the early stages of vemurafenib treatment, arising from new erupting melanocytic proliferations or rapidly changing existing nevi.9 Zimmer et al,9 Dalle et al,7 and Perier-Muzet et al8 report that these new primary melanomas arising during vemurafenib therapy are BRAF wild type.

Herein we describe an example of nevus volatility and propose the molecular involvement in a patient undergoing BRAFV600E inhibition therapy and who participated in a nevus surveillance study. All patients in the surveillance study provided written consent, and the study followed the Declaration of Helsinki protocols and was approved by the Princess Alexandra Hospital human research ethics committee.

Report of a Case

While participating in a nevus surveillance study, 1 of the patients, a man in his 30s who had been diagnosed 5 years earlier as having a superficial melanoma (Clark level 3, Breslow index 0.64 mm), developed metastases in the pancreas, liver, and mesenteric lymph nodes. Two months later, he was enrolled in a clinical trial of dabrafenib with or without trametinib therapy. Dabrafenib is a BRAF inhibitor similar to vemurafenib, and it was being tested with trametinib, a MEK (MAPK kinase) inhibitor that targets the same MAPK pathway. The trial was blinded and still ongoing at the time of the present report, and so it is unknown whether this patient’s treatment regimen included trametinib.

The patient presented with Fitzpatrick skin type III, dark brown hair, and green eyes. He underwent imaging with a FotoFinder system (FotoFinder Systems GmbH) of all nevi larger than 2 mm on the back and larger than 5 mm on the rest of the body. No significant changes were observed dermoscopically throughout. Ten nevi larger than 5 mm were identified on the body, while 25 nevi larger than 2 mm were identified on the back, for a total of 31 nevi included in our analysis. There were 2 globular, 15 reticular, and 14 nonspecific/homogeneous nevi.

Full-body and dermoscopic imaging was conducted 5 times over the next 27 months at roughly 7-month intervals, and no significant dermoscopic changes were identified by assessment of imaged nevi at the 7- or 14-month visits. However, at the 21-month visit, 6 months after he commenced participation in the BRAF inhibitor trial, assessment revealed significant dermoscopic changes 16 nevi (51% of total) (Figure 1). The nevi changes predominantly involved involution and a decrease in pigmentation and size. In addition, in concurrence with other reports,6 flattening of raised nevi was also observed. By dermoscopic pattern, 4 reticular, 10 homogeneous, and 2 globular nevi showed signs of involution. Therefore, 71% of the unspecific and 26% of the reticular nevi showed signs of involution, while both raised globular nevi decreased in pigmentation and flattened.

Figure 1.  Surveillance of Involuting Nevi During BRAFV600E Inhibitor Therapy and Clinical Image of Back
Surveillance of Involuting Nevi During BRAFV600E Inhibitor Therapy and Clinical Image of Back

A-C, Three nevi have undergone involution 7 months after initiation of BRAFV600E inhibitor therapy. D and E, The other 2 nevi remain unchanged. Excisional shave biopsies and numerous ex vivo microbiopsies were performed on nevi C and E. Images to the left of the vertical red line were obtained before the patient commenced participation in the BRAF inhibitor trial; images to the right of the line were obtained after he entered the trial. F, Clinical image of the back shows nevi locations: white arrow indicates biopsied involuting nevus; white circles indicate involuting nevi; black arrow indicates biopsied unchanged nevus; black circles indicate unchanged nevi.

By the time of final imaging at 27 months’ surveillance (12 months into the BRAF inhibitor trial), the nevi had generally not further changed, but 5 nevi had continued to involute: 3 reticular and 2 homogeneous nevi. Again, no increase in pigmentation was observed in any lesions, and no new nevi were observed. The patient had an otherwise excellent systemic response to the targeted therapy and an excellent partial response to the point of almost a complete response, with the exception of a small unchanged node near the pancreas that was seen on computed tomographic imaging.

There are a number of external and endogenous factors influencing changes and appearance of nevi over time. These include UV radiation exposure, hormonal changes associated with pregnancy,10 and targeted melanoma therapies such as selective BRAFV600E inhibitors.6 As unchanged and changed nevi were at times adjacent at the same body site, UV exposure was not considered to be a major influencing factor, and pregnancy cannot be considered in our male patient. Therefore to sample molecular markers, specifically BRAF mutation status of changed and unchanged nevi, we used a newly described microbiopsy device.11-13

Diagnostic shave excisions were performed on 1 involuted nevus and 1 unchanged nevus (Figure 1). The histopathologic diagnosis for the involuted lesion was a predominantly junctional compound nevus without significant inflammation or fibrosis, and the unchanged lesion was characterized as a junctional nevus with a lentiginous melanocytic pattern. Microbiopsy specimens were taken from 6 locations on both of the excised nevi (Figure 2). DNA samples extracted from microbiopsy specimens were subjected to polymerase chain reaction amplification using selected forward and reverse primers to flank the BRAF exon 15 and NRAS exon 2 mutation hotspots.14 Molecular sequencing of the samples for BRAF and NRAS mutations were performed after extraction of amplified products from the DNA gel. Sequencing revealed heterogeneous BRAFV600E mutation in the involuting nevus and BRAF wild type in the unchanged nevus, while both lesions were NRAS wild type.

Figure 2.  Histopathologic Images and Molecular Sequencing Charts for BRAFV600E Status of 1 Involuting Nevus and 1 Noninvoluting Nevus
Histopathologic Images and Molecular Sequencing Charts for BRAFV600E Status of 1 Involuting Nevus and 1 Noninvoluting Nevus

A-D, Workup of an involuting nevus. E-H, Workup of a noninvoluting nevus. C and G, Dermoscopic images show microbiopsy sites 1 through 5 (scale bar = 1 mm); site 6 in each panel is a control biopsy site adjacent to the nevus. D and H, Molecular analysis charts for microbiopsy sites shown in panels C and G, respectively. A and E, Histopathologic images of the nevi, neither of which shows any histopathological criteria for melanoma (scale bars = 200 µm; boxes enclose areas shown at higher magnification in panels B and F). The involuted nevus in panel A is a benign, predominantly junctional nevus with few discrete nests of nonpigmented nevus cells at the dermal-epidermal junction; subtle lymphatic infiltration around suprapapillary vascular plexus; and no obvious signs of fibrosis or regression; sequencing (D) reveals that the nevus is heterogeneous for BRAFV600E mutation at sites 1 and 5. The noninvoluted nevus in panel E is a benign lentiginous melanocytic nevus with elongated pigmented rete ridges and slightly increased numbers of melanocytes at the dermal-epidermal junction; small junctional nests of melanocytes are also present; and sequencing (H) reveals no presence of BRAFV600E mutation. B and F, Greater magnifications of the boxed areas of panels A and E, respectively (scale bars = 200 μm).


The involution of nevi in BRAFV600E inhibitor therapy has been reported, but herein we report findings that support the hypothesis6 that these nevi are BRAFV600E positive. This is related to decreased MAPK activity due to BRAF inhibition. In contrast to reports in vemurafenib-treated patients of increased size and pigmentation in some nevi and the appearance of new BRAF wild-type melanoma through paradoxical BRAF activation,15 we observed no increase in pigmentation of nevi or suspect changes in our patient. Because we could not know whether our dabrafenib-treated patient was also receiving trametinib, conclusions regarding the combination regimen cannot be drawn. However, our long-term monitoring prior to and during therapy combined with confirmation of involuting nevi possessing BRAFV600E mutation adds another component to the dermoscopic changes in long-term therapy with BRAFV600E inhibitors. Larger-scale and longer-term trials will give a broader and more accurate description of specific medication effects required for dermatologic follow-up.

Back to top
Article Information

Corresponding Author: H. Peter Soyer, MD, FACD, Level 5, Translational Research Institute (TRI), 37 Kent St, Woolloongabba QLD 4102, Australia (p.soyer@uq.edu.au).

Accepted for Publication: February 26, 2014.

Published Online: April 2, 2014. doi:10.1001/jamadermatol.2014.436.

Author Contributions: Mr McClenahan had full access to all of the data in the study and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.

Study concept and design: McClenahan, Flewell-Smith, Soyer.

Acquisition of data: McClenahan, Lin, Tan, Jagirdar, Atkinson, Lambie, Prow, Sturm, Soyer.

Analysis and interpretation of data: McClenahan, Lin, Schaider, Jagirdar, Prow, Sturm, Soyer.

Drafting of the manuscript: McClenahan, Lin, Flewell-Smith, Schaider, Prow, Soyer.

Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: McClenahan, Tan, Jagirdar, Atkinson, Lambie, Sturm, Soyer.

Statistical analysis: McClenahan, Sturm, Soyer.

Obtained funding: Soyer.

Administrative, technical, or material support: Lin, Tan, Flewell-Smith, Jagirdar, Lambie, Prow, Sturm, Soyer.

Study supervision: Schaider, Sturm, Soyer.

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: None reported.

Funding/Support: This study was supported in part by research grant APP1004999 from the National Health and Medical Research Council, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia.

Role of the Sponsor: The National Health and Medical Research Concil had no role in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript; and decision to submit the manuscript for publication.

Davies  H, Bignell  GR, Cox  C,  et al.  Mutations of the BRAF gene in human cancer.  Nature. 2002;417(6892):949-954.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Pollock  PM, Harper  UL, Hansen  KS,  et al.  High frequency of BRAF mutations in nevi.  Nat Genet. 2003;33(1):19-20.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Wan  PT, Garnett  MJ, Roe  SM,  et al; Cancer Genome Project.  Mechanism of activation of the RAF-ERK signaling pathway by oncogenic mutations of B-RAF.  Cell. 2004;116(6):855-867.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Thomas  NE.  BRAF somatic mutations in malignant melanoma and melanocytic naevi.  Melanoma Res. 2006;16(2):97-103.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Flaherty  KT, Puzanov  I, Kim  KB,  et al.  Inhibition of mutated, activated BRAF in metastatic melanoma.  N Engl J Med. 2010;363(9):809-819.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Haenssle  HA, Kraus  SL, Brehmer  F,  et al.  Dynamic changes in nevi of a patient with melanoma treated with vemurafenib: importance of sequential dermoscopy.  Arch Dermatol. 2012;148(10):1183-1185.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Dalle  S, Poulalhon  N, Thomas  L.  Vemurafenib in melanoma with BRAF V600E mutation.  N Engl J Med. 2011;365(15):1448-1450.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Perier-Muzet  M, Thomas  L, Poulalhon  N,  et al.  Melanoma patients under vemurafenib: prospective follow-up of melanocytic lesions by digital dermoscopy [published online November 7, 2013].  J Invest Dermatol. doi:10.1038/jid.2013.462.PubMedGoogle Scholar
Zimmer  L, Hillen  U, Livingstone  E,  et al.  Atypical melanocytic proliferations and new primary melanomas in patients with advanced melanoma undergoing selective BRAF inhibition.  J Clin Oncol. 2012;30(19):2375-2383.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Hofmann-Wellenhof  R, Wolf  P, Smolle  J, Reimann-Weber  A, Soyer  HP, Kerl  H.  Influence of UVB therapy on dermoscopic features of acquired melanocytic nevi.  J Am Acad Dermatol. 1997;37(4):559-563.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Soyer  HP, Lin  LL, Prow  TW.  A plea for biobanking of all equivocal melanocytic proliferations.  JAMA Dermatol. 2013;149(9):1023-1024.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Banan  P, Lin  LL, Lambie  D, Prow  T, Soyer  HP.  Effects of ex vivo skin microbiopsy on histopathologic diagnosis in melanocytic skin lesions.  JAMA Dermatol. 2013;149(9):1107-1109.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Lin  LL, Prow  TW, Raphael  AP,  et al.  Microbiopsy engineered for minimally invasive and suture-free sub-millimetre skin sampling.  F1000 Res. 2013;2:120. doi:10.12688/f1000research.2-120.v2. http://f1000research.com/articles/2-120/v2. Accessed February 26, 2013.Google Scholar
Tschandl  P, Berghoff  AS, Preusser  M,  et al.  NRAS and BRAF mutations in melanoma-associated nevi and uninvolved nevi.  PLoS One. 2013;8(7):e69639.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Hatzivassiliou  G, Song  K, Yen  I,  et al.  RAF inhibitors prime wild-type RAF to activate the MAPK pathway and enhance growth.  Nature. 2010;464(7287):431-435.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref