Association Between Indoor Tanning and Melanoma in Younger Men and Women | Dermatology | JAMA Dermatology | JAMA Network
[Skip to Navigation]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
Bradford  PT, Anderson  WF, Purdue  MP, Goldstein  AM, Tucker  MA.  Rising melanoma incidence rates of the trunk among younger women in the United States.  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2010;19(9):2401-2406.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Watson  M, Johnson  CJ, Chen  VW,  et al.  Melanoma surveillance in the United States: overview of methods.  J Am Acad Dermatol. 2011;65(5)(suppl 1):S6-S16.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Coelho  SG, Hearing  VJ.  UVA tanning is involved in the increased incidence of skin cancers in fair-skinned young women.  Pigment Cell Melanoma Res. 2010;23(1):57-63.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
El Ghissassi  F, Baan  R, Straif  K,  et al; WHO International Agency for Research on Cancer Monograph Working Group.  A review of human carcinogens—part D: radiation.  Lancet Oncol. 2009;10(8):751-752.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Guy  GP  Jr, Berkowitz  Z, Tai  E, Holman  DM, Everett Jones  S, Richardson  LC.  Indoor tanning among high school students in the United States, 2009 and 2011.  JAMA Dermatol. 2014;150(5):501-511.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Guy  GP  Jr, Berkowitz  Z, Watson  M, Holman  DM, Richardson  LC.  Indoor tanning among young non-Hispanic white females.  JAMA Intern Med. 2013;173(20):1920-1922.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).  Use of indoor tanning devices by adults—United States, 2010.  MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2012;61(18):323-326.PubMedGoogle Scholar
Guy  GP, Berkowitz  Z, Jones  SE, Holman  DM, Garnett  E, Watson  M.  Trends in indoor tanning among US high school students, 2009-2013.  JAMA Dermatol. 2015;151(4):448-450.Google ScholarCrossref
Lazovich  D, Vogel  RI, Berwick  M, Weinstock  MA, Anderson  KE, Warshaw  EM.  Indoor tanning and risk of melanoma: a case-control study in a highly exposed population.  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2010;19(6):1557-1568.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Colantonio  S, Bracken  MB, Beecker  J.  The association of indoor tanning and melanoma in adults: systematic review and meta-analysis.  J Am Acad Dermatol. 2014;70(5):847-857.Google ScholarCrossref
Minnesota Cancer Surveillance System, Minnesota Department of Health. Accessed May 15, 2015.
Westerdahl  J, Olsson  H, Måsbäck  A,  et al.  Use of sunbeds or sunlamps and malignant melanoma in southern Sweden.  Am J Epidemiol. 1994;140(8):691-699.PubMedGoogle Scholar
Westerdahl  J, Ingvar  C, Måsbäck  A, Jonsson  N, Olsson  H.  Risk of cutaneous malignant melanoma in relation to use of sunbeds: further evidence for UV-A carcinogenicity.  Br J Cancer. 2000;82(9):1593-1599.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Cust  AE, Armstrong  BK, Goumas  C,  et al.  Sunbed use during adolescence and early adulthood is associated with increased risk of early-onset melanoma.  Int J Cancer. 2011;128(10):2425-2435.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
MacKie  RM, Freudenberger  T, Aitchison  TC.  Personal risk-factor chart for cutaneous melanoma.  Lancet. 1989;2(8661):487-490.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Walter  SD, Marrett  LD, From  L, Hertzman  C, Shannon  HS, Roy  P.  The association of cutaneous malignant melanoma with the use of sunbeds and sunlamps.  Am J Epidemiol. 1990;131(2):232-243.PubMedGoogle Scholar
Chen  YT, Dubrow  R, Zheng  T, Barnhill  RL, Fine  J, Berwick  M.  Sunlamp use and the risk of cutaneous malignant melanoma: a population-based case-control study in Connecticut, USA.  Int J Epidemiol. 1998;27(5):758-765.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Boniol  M, Autier  P, Boyle  P, Gandini  S.  Cutaneous melanoma attributable to sunbed use: systematic review and meta-analysis.  BMJ. 2012;345:e4757.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Boniol  M, Autier  P, Boyle  P, Gandini  S.  Cutaneous melanoma attributable to sunbed use: systematic review and meta-analysis.  BMJ. 2012;345:e4757.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Oliver  H, Ferguson  J, Moseley  H.  Quantitative risk assessment of sunbeds: impact of new high power lamps.  Br J Dermatol. 2007;157(2):350-356.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Nilsen  LT, Hannevik  M, Aalerud  TN, Johnsen  B, Friberg  EG, Veierød  MB.  Trends in UV irradiance of tanning devices in Norway: 1983-2005.  Photochem Photobiol. 2008;84(5):1100-1108.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Facta  S, Fusette  SS, Bonino  A, Anglesio  L, d’Amore  G.  UV emissions from artificial tanning devices and their compliance with the European technical standard.  Health Phys. 2013;104(4):385-393.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Tierney  P, Ferguson  J, Ibbotson  S, Dawe  R, Eadie  E, Moseley  H.  Nine out of 10 sunbeds in England emit ultraviolet radiation levels that exceed current safety limits.  Br J Dermatol. 2013;168(3):602-608.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Whiteman  DC, Pavan  WJ, Bastian  BC.  The melanomas: a synthesis of epidemiological, clinical, histopathological, genetic, and biological aspects, supporting distinct subtypes, causal pathways, and cells of origin.  Pigment Cell Melanoma Res. 2011;24(5):879-897.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Olsen  CM, Zens  MS, Stukel  TA,  et al.  Nevus density and melanoma risk in women: a pooled analysis to test the divergent pathway hypothesis.  Int J Cancer. 2009;124(4):937-944.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Berwick  M.  Pathways to the development of melanoma: a complex issue.  J Invest Dermatol. 2006;126(9):1932-1933.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Fears  TR, Sagebiel  RW, Halpern  A,  et al.  Sunbeds and sunlamps: who used them and their risk for melanoma.  Pigment Cell Melanoma Res. 2011;24(3):574-581.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Bataille  V, Boniol  M, De Vries  E,  et al.  A multicentre epidemiological study on sunbed use and cutaneous melanoma in Europe.  Eur J Cancer. 2005;41(14):2141-2149.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Bataille  V, Winnett  A, Sasieni  P, Newton Bishop  JA, Cuzick  J.  Exposure to the sun and sunbeds and the risk of cutaneous melanoma in the UK: a case-control study.  Eur J Cancer. 2004;40(3):429-435.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
National Conference of State Legislatures. Indoor Tanning Restrictions for Minors: A State-By-State Comparison. Accessed October 26, 2015.
US Food and Drug Adminstration. FDA to require warnings on sunlamp products. Accessed September 22, 2014.
US Department of Health and Human Services.  The Surgeon General’s Call to Action to Prevent Skin Cancer. Washington, DC: US Dept of Health and Human Services, Office of the Surgeon General; 2014.
Original Investigation
March 2016

Association Between Indoor Tanning and Melanoma in Younger Men and Women

Author Affiliations
  • 1Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis
  • 2Division of Epidemiology and Community Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis
  • 3Center for Dermatoepidemiology, VA Medical Center, Providence, Rhode Island
  • 4Department of Dermatology, Rhode Island Hospital, Providence
  • 5Department of Dermatology and Epidemiology, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island
  • 6Department of Dermatology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis
  • 7Department of Internal Medicine, University of New Mexico Cancer Center, Albuquerque
  • 8Division of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque
JAMA Dermatol. 2016;152(3):268-275. doi:10.1001/jamadermatol.2015.2938

Importance  In the United States and Minnesota, melanoma incidence is rising more steeply among women than men younger than 50 years. To our knowledge, no study has examined age- and sex-specific associations between indoor tanning and melanoma to determine if these trends could be due to greater indoor tanning use among younger women.

Objective  To examine associations between indoor tanning and melanoma among men and women younger than 50 years.

Design, Setting, and Participants  Population-based case-control study conducted in Minnesota of 681 patients (465 [68.3%] women) diagnosed as having melanoma between 2004 and 2007, and 654 controls (446 [68.2%] women), ages 25 to 49 years.

Exposure  Indoor tanning, defined as any use, first age of use, and total sessions.

Main Outcomes and Measures  Crude and adjusted odds ratios (ORs) and 95% CIs were calculated for melanoma in relation to indoor tanning exposure for men and women by diagnosis or reference age (<30, 30-39, 40-49 years). Sex-specific associations for indoor tanning and melanoma by anatomic site were examined.

Results  Compared with women aged 40 to 49 years, women younger than 40 years initiated indoor tanning at a younger age (16 vs 25 years, P < .001) and reported more frequent indoor tanning (median number of sessions, 100 vs 40, P < .001). Women younger than 30 years were 6 times more likely to be in the case than the control group if they tanned indoors (crude OR, 6.0; 95% CI, 1.3-28.5). Odds ratios were also significantly elevated among women, ages 30 to 49 years (adjusted OR, 3.5; 95% CI, 1.2-9.7 for women 30-39 years; adjusted OR, 2.3; 95% CI, 1.4-3.6 for women 40-49 years); a dose response was observed among women regardless of age. Among men, results by age were inconsistent. The strongest OR for indoor tanning by anatomic site was for melanomas arising on the trunk of women (adjusted OR, 3.7; 95% CI, 1.9-7.2).

Conclusions and Relevance  Indoor tanning is a likely factor for the steeper increase in melanoma rates in the United States among younger women compared with men, given the timing of when women initiated indoor tanning relative to diagnosis. The melanoma epidemic can be expected to continue unless indoor tanning is restricted and reduced.