Key PointsQuestion
What factors are associated with aggressive squamous cell carcinoma in solid organ transplant recipients?
Findings
In this case series study of 51 patients, aggressive squamous cell carcinomas were preferentially localized on the face in 34 patients (67%). A total of 21 tumors (41%) were poorly differentiated, with a median tumor diameter of 18 mm and median tumor depth of 6.2 mm.
Meaning
As suggested by results of this case series, anatomical site, differentiation, tumor diameter, tumor depth, and perineural invasion are important risk factors in aggressive squamous cell carcinoma in solid organ transplant recipients.
Importance
Squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) is the most frequent malignant neoplasm found in solid organ transplant recipients and is associated with a more aggressive disease course and higher risk of metastasis and death than in the general population.
Objectives
To report the clinicopathologic features of and identify factors associated with aggressive SCC in solid organ transplant recipients.
Methods
This retrospective multicentric case series included 51 patients who underwent solid organ transplantation and were found to have aggressive SCC, defined by nodal or distant metastasis or death by local progression of primary SCC. Standard questionnaires were completed by the researchers between July 18, 2005, and January 1, 2015. Data were analyzed between February 22, 2016, and July 12, 2016.
Results
Of the 51 participants, 43 were men and 8 were women, with a median age of 51 years (range, 19-71 years) at time of transplantation and 62 years (range, 36-77 years) at time of diagnosis of aggressive SCC. The distribution of aggressive SCC was preferentially on the face (34 [67%]) and scalp (6 [12%]), followed by the upper extremities (6 [12%]). A total of 21 tumors (41%) were poorly differentiated, with a median tumor diameter of 18.0 mm (range, 4.0-64.0 mm) and median tumor depth of 6.2 mm (range, 1.0-20.0 mm). Perineural invasion was present in 20 patients (39%), while 23 (45%) showed a local recurrence. The 5-year overall survival rate was 23%, while 5-year disease-specific survival was 30.5%.
Conclusions and Relevance
Results of this case series suggest that anatomical site, differentiation, tumor diameter, tumor depth, and perineural invasion are important risk factors in aggressive SCC in solid organ transplant recipients.
Cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) is a malignant neoplasm deriving from epidermal keratinocytes. In the general population, SCC is the second most common form of keratinocyte carcinoma after basal cell basal cell carcinoma,1,2 and in organ transplant recipients SCC is the most common skin cancer.1-11 Previous studies12-15 report a risk for nodal metastasis of 1.9% to 4.0% and a risk for disease-specific death of 1.5% to 2.1% in the general population.
The number of solid organ transplants and long-term survival in organ transplant recipients have increased over the 5 decades as a result of progress in both surgical techniques and drug-induced immunosuppression.16 Notwithstanding the clear benefits of successful allograft transplantation, organ transplant recipients experience important adverse effects from long-term immunosuppressive medication, including a 10-fold increased risk for malignant neoplasms overall.17,18 In particular, solid organ transplant recipients have a 65-fold to 250-fold higher incidence of SCC compared with those who have not received transplants. After transplantation, 20% to 75% of solid organ transplant recipients are affected by at least 1 SCC within 20 years.8,19 After a first invasive SCC, multiple subsequent SCCs will develop in 60% to 80% of these patients within 3 years. The risk of SCC increases over time, with the incidence increasing to 40% to 60% at 20 years after transplantation.20,21
Cutaneous SCC is also associated with a more aggressive behavior and a higher risk of metastasis and death in solid organ transplant recipients than in the general population.6,7,22 The rate of metastasis in solid organ transplant recipients is reported to be 5% to 8%.23
In addition to immunosuppression and time from transplantation, the factors for the development of SCC in solid organ transplant recipients are similar to those found in the general population, namely, male sex, older age, cumulative UV radiation exposure, and fair skin.1,7,8,24-28
Although most SCCs will be successfully treated, some show a very aggressive clinical course. Currently, the distinction between the many SCCs cured without sequelae and the few SCCs with an aggressive course can be hard to make at diagnosis. The objective of this study, based on a European case series of solid organ transplant recipients, is to describe clinicopathologic features of aggressive SCC and to identify factors that are associated with aggressive development of SCC in solid organ transplant recipients.
Clinical and histological data were retrospectively collected from 5 centers: Brussels, Belgium; Barcelona, Spain; Leiden, the Netherlands; London, United Kingdom; and Zurich, Switzerland, within the Skin Care in Organ Transplant Patients, Europe Network. The study protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of Zurich, Switzerland (NCT02095912), who waived patient consent for deidentified data.
Inclusion criteria were patients who underwent solid organ transplantation and developed an aggressive SCC including nodal or distant metastasis or death by local progression of primary SCC. All patient identifiers were coded to ensure patient anonymity. Exclusion criteria were the absence of an aggressive SCC, mucosal head and neck SCC, or missing data. All participating centers were able to identify and retrieve information on organ transplant recipients with aggressive SCC from their archives. Standard questionnaires were completed by us between July 18, 2005, and January 1, 2015, and dates of analysis were February 22, 2016, to July 12, 2018. Patients were followed up from the date of first transplantation to date of death or the last dermatologist visit. Skin phototype classification was not recorded because of incomplete data at the time of inclusion. Data were obtained from the hospital database including patient medical records and pathology reports.
Disease-specific death was considered to have occurred if the treatment team documented that the patient died of a specific SCC or of complications that arose directly from SCC. Non–disease-specific death was considered to have occurred in patients who developed nodal or distant metastasis or a local, treatment-refractory tumor but died of other causes (eg, cardiac arrest).
Clinical characteristics were summarized with the use of descriptive statistics and frequency tabulation. Overall survival, disease-specific survival, progression-free survival, and time from metastasis to death were analyzed by the Kaplan-Meier method. Statistical analysis was performed with IBM SPSS statistical software, version 23.0. (SPSS Inc). No significance testing was performed.
Most of the 51 solid organ transplant recipients who developed an aggressive SCC were men (43 [84%]) and had received a kidney transplant (40 [78%]). Median age at diagnosis of aggressive SCC was 62 years (range, 36-77 years). Three patients (6%) underwent combined kidney and pancreas transplantation and 1 patient had a liver and lung transplant. Ten patients (20%) underwent 2 transplantations because of organ failure. Full characteristics of the study population are summarized in Table 1.
The most common primary site for SCC was the face (34 [67%]) (Table 2). The median diameter of aggressive SCC was 18.0 mm (range, 4.0-64.0 mm), with a median depth of invasion of 6.2 mm (range, 1.0-20.0 mm). A total of 21 tumors (41%) were histologically classified as poorly differentiated and perineural invasion was identified in 20 of the SCCs (39%). The local recurrence rate was 45% (n=23). Tumor characteristics are listed in detail in Table 2. The Figure shows overall survival, disease-specific survival, progression-free survival, and time from metastasis to death overall by Kaplan-Meier analysis. Figure, A shows that 50% overall survival was reached at 28.0 months (95% CI, 21.3-34.7 months) and mean (SD) 5-year overall survival was 23.0% (6.4%), while mean (SD) 10-year survival was 11.3% (5.5%). Figure, B shows that 50% disease-specific survival was reached at 33.0 months (95% CI, 0.9-45.1 months) and mean (SD) 5-year disease-specific survival was 30.5% (7.6%), while mean (SD) 10-year survival was 25.9% (7.1%). Figure, C shows that mean (SD) 5-year and 10-year progression-free survival were 5.0% (1.3%) (95% CI, 2.5-7.3 years). Median time from metastasis to death was 12.0 months (95% CI, 3.8-20.2 months) (Figure, D). Almost all SCCs showed progression within 2 years from diagnosis.
Most of our solid organ transplant recipients were male, with a median age of 51 years at the time of transplantation and median age of 62 years at diagnosis of aggressive SCC. This finding is in agreement with those of Pinho et al,29 who reported on keratinocyte carcinoma, with a median patient age of 54.5 years at transplantation and 61.9 years at diagnosis of aggressive SCC. In contrast to our data, there was no difference in terms of sex in their study. In a study by Lott et al,22 SCC in solid organ transplant recipients occurred earlier, at a median age of 57 years, compared with immunocompetent patients, who developed SCC at a median age of 67 years.22 Although our case series was not selected in a randomized fashion, our patient characteristics suggest that our series is typical for solid organ transplant recipients.
The body site for aggressive SCC in our study was preferentially on the face and scalp, followed by the upper extremities. Rabinovics et al30 similarly report a high number of SCC in the head and neck region, with a 24% incidence of aggressive (local recurrence, nodal, or distant metastasis) head and neck SCC in solid organ transplant recipients, compared with other aggressive malignant neoplasms occurring on the head and neck. Pinho et al29 found keratinocyte cancer on UV-exposed sites for 83% of SCCs and 87% of basal cell carcinomas.
Most tumors in our series were poorly or moderately differentiated. The presence of poor differentiation indicates a poorer prognosis. Brantsch et al13 demonstrate a 3-fold higher risk for local recurrence and a 2-fold higher risk for metastasis compared with well-differentiated SCCs. Mullen et al31 demonstrate a 2.9-fold higher risk of metastasis or death in poorly differentiated tumors compared with well-differentiated or moderately differentiated tumors.
The median tumor diameter in our study was 18 mm (range, 4-64 mm). This diameter is slightly smaller than a Swedish cohort in which aggressive SCCs were 20 mm in diameter or larger.32 Based on a meta-analysis by Thompson et al,33 tumor diameter larger than 2 cm is the risk factor most highly associated with disease-specific death and a 19-fold higher risk of death from SCC compared with tumors with a diameter less than 2 cm.
The median tumor thickness in our study population was 6.2 mm. This risk factor is highly associated with recurrence and metastasis, with tumor thickness greater than 2 mm having a 10-fold higher risk of local recurrence and 11-fold higher risk of metastasis.33 In a prospective study by Breuninger et al,34 tumor depth greater than 4 mm was linked to a metastasis rate of 9%, increasing to a metastasis rate of 16% for a tumor thickness of 6 mm or more.
Perineural invasion (39%) and local recurrence (45%) were frequent in our study, but will have been selected for in a cohort of patients with aggressive SCC. In the general population, perineural invasion is rare, with an incidence of 2.5% to 5.0% for primary SCCs, and is associated with a 4-fold to 5-fold increased risk of nodal metastasis and death due to SCC.35 Local recurrence is reported to occur in 7% to 16% of all patients with SCC and is more frequent when there is perineural invasion.30,36
The most common location of metastasis in the solid organ transplant recipients in our study was the lymph nodes, including the parotid gland and skin. Lindelöf et al32 demonstrated that all lethal SCCs (7 of 544 SCCs in a cohort of 5931 solid organ transplant recipients) were located on the head, and that the parotid gland was the principal site for metastasis. A retrospective study by Lott et al22 found a 3.5 higher risk for solid organ transplant recipients to develop lymph node metastasis compared with the tumors in the immunocompetent control group.
Our study demonstrated a poor prognosis of aggressive SCC, with a 5-year overall survival rate of 23% and a 5-year disease-specific survival rate of 30.5%. Rabinovics et al30 showed a 5-year survival rate of 67.7% and 10-year survival rate of 40.0% in patients with SCC; however, that study included nonaggressive SCC. Lott et al22 reported a 3-year disease-specific survival rate of 56% for metastatic SCC in solid organ transplant recipients. A study by Mullen et al31 showed a 5-year overall survival rate of 35% and a 5-year disease-specific survival rate of 50% in patients with aggressive SCC of the trunk or extremities. In summary, our case series in solid organ transplant recipients shows an unfavorable survival for those with primary SCC with aggressive features, comparable with that seen in other reports.
This study is limited by its retrospective design, the limited number of patients, and number of contributing centers. There is an implict bias in selecting tumors with a poor outcome (ie, recurrence, metastasis, and death) toward clinical and pathologic factors known to be associated with poor outcomes, such as perineural invasion. Another limitation is the lack of a control group (solid organ transplant recipients without development of aggressive SCC). Data on ethnicity, skin type, and sun exposure were not available.
Taken together, our case series confirms that anatomical site, differentiation, tumor diameter, tumor depth, and perineural invasion are important risk factors in aggressive SCC in solid organ transplant recipients. We also demonstrated a poor prognosis of aggressive SCC.
Accepted for Publication: September 28, 2018.
Corresponding Author: Joana Lanz, MD, Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Zurich, Rämistrasse 100, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland (lanz.joana@outlook.com).
Published Online: December 5, 2018. doi:10.1001/jamadermatol.2018.4406
Author Contributions: Drs Lanz and Hofbauer had full access to all of the data in the study and take responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.
Concept and design: Lanz, Bouwes Bavinck, Harwood, Proby, Ferrandiz, del Marmol, Hofbauer.
Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data: Lanz, Bouwes Bavinck, Westhuis, Quint, Harwood, Nasir, Van-de-Velde, Ferrándiz, Genders, del Marmol, Forchetti, Hafner, Vital, Hofbauer.
Drafting of the manuscript: Lanz, Hofbauer.
Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: Bouwes Bavinck, Westhuis, Quint, Harwood, Nasir, Van-de-Velde, Proby, Ferrándiz, Genders, del Marmol, Forchetti, Hafner, Vital, Hofbauer.
Statistical analysis: Lanz, Nasir.
Obtained funding: Lanz, Hofbauer.
Administrative, technical, or material support: Westhuis, Quint, Nasir, Van-de-Velde, Ferrándiz, Genders, Hafner, Hofbauer.
Supervision: Bouwes Bavinck, Quint, Harwood, Nasir, Proby, del Marmol, Hafner, Hofbauer.
Conflict of Interest Disclosures: None reported.
1.Harwood
CA, Toland
AE, Proby
CM,
et al; KeraCon Consortium. The pathogenesis of cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma in organ transplant recipients.
Br J Dermatol. 2017;177(5):1217-1224. doi:
10.1111/bjd.15956PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 8.Krynitz
B, Edgren
G, Lindelöf
B,
et al. Risk of skin cancer and other malignancies in kidney, liver, heart and lung transplant recipients 1970 to 2008—a Swedish population-based study.
Int J Cancer. 2013;132(6):1429-1438. doi:
10.1002/ijc.27765PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 10.Madeleine
MM, Patel
NS, Plasmeijer
EI,
et al; the Keratinocyte Carcinoma Consortium (KeraCon) Immunosuppression Working Group. Epidemiology of keratinocyte carcinomas after organ transplantation.
Br J Dermatol. 2017;177(5):1208-1216. doi:
10.1111/bjd.15931PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 20.O’Reilly Zwald
F, Brown
M. Skin cancer in solid organ transplant recipients: advances in therapy and management, part I: epidemiology of skin cancer in solid organ transplant recipients.
J Am Acad Dermatol. 2011;65(2):253-261. doi:
10.1016/j.jaad.2010.11.062PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 23.Martinez
JC, Otley
CC, Stasko
T,
et al; Transplant-Skin Cancer Collaborative. Defining the clinical course of metastatic skin cancer in organ transplant recipients: a multicenter collaborative study.
Arch Dermatol. 2003;139(3):301-306. doi:
10.1001/archderm.139.3.301PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 24.Bouwes Bavinck
JN, Euvrard
S, Naldi
L,
et al; EPI-HPV-UV-CA group. Keratotic skin lesions and other risk factors are associated with skin cancer in organ-transplant recipients: a case-control study in the Netherlands, United Kingdom, Germany, France, and Italy.
J Invest Dermatol. 2007;127(7):1647-1656. doi:
10.1038/sj.jid.5700776PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 27.Rodríguez-Acosta
ED, Calva-Mercado
JJ, Alberú-Gómez
J, Vilatoba-Chapa
M, Domínguez-Cherit
J. Patients with solid organ transplantation and skin cancer: determination of risk factors with emphasis in photoexposure and immunosuppressive regimen: experience in a third level hospital [in Spanish].
Gac Med Mex. 2015;151(1):20-26.
PubMedGoogle Scholar 28.Perez
HC, Benavides
X, Perez
JS,
et al. Basic aspects of the pathogenesis and prevention of non-melanoma skin cancer in solid organ transplant recipients: a review.
Int J Dermatol. 2017;56(4):370-378. doi:
10.1111/ijd.13409PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 32.Lindelöf
B, Jarnvik
J, Ternesten-Bratel
A, Granath
F, Hedblad
MA. Mortality and clinicopathological features of cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma in organ transplant recipients: a study of the Swedish cohort.
Acta Derm Venereol. 2006;86(3):219-222. doi:
10.2340/00015555-0069PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 34.Breuninger
H, Brantsch
K, Eigentler
T, Häfner
HM. Comparison and evaluation of the current staging of cutaneous carcinomas.
J Dtsch Dermatol Ges. 2012;10(8):579-586.
PubMedGoogle Scholar