[Skip to Content]
[Skip to Content Landing]
Views 203
Citations 0
April 2019

Errors in Key Points and Conclusions and in Editorial

JAMA Dermatol. 2019;155(4):504. doi:10.1001/jamadermatol.2019.0710

In the Original Investigation “Pulsed Dye Laser Treatment of Port-Wine Stains in Infancy Without the Need for General Anesthesia,”1 published March 13, 2019, there were numeric errors in the Key Points and Conclusions. In the Findings section of the Key Points and the Conclusions, the percentage value given as 34.0% should have been 25.9%. In the Findings section of the Key Points, the value given as 37.6% should have been 41.1%. This article was corrected online. In the accompanying editorial, “Early Use of Laser for Port-Wine Stains: Timing, Efficacy, and Shared Decision Making,”2 the fifth-paragraph percentage values 27.4% and 39.1% should have been 25.9% and 41.1%, respectively. This editorial was corrected online.

Jeon  H, Bernstein  LJ, Belkin  DA, Ghalili  S, Geronemus  RG.  Pulsed dye laser treatment of port-wine stains in infancy without the need for general anesthesia  [published online March 13, 2019].  JAMA Dermatol. doi:10.1001/jamadermatol.2018.5249PubMedGoogle Scholar
Mathes  EF, Frieden  IJ.  Early use of laser for port-wine stains: timing, efficacy, and shared decision making  [published online March 13, 2019].  JAMA Dermatol. doi:10.1001/jamadermatol.2018.5189PubMedGoogle Scholar