Uniform Resource Locator Decay in Dermatology Journals: Author Attitudes and Preservation Practices | Dermatology | JAMA Dermatology | JAMA Network
[Skip to Navigation]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 35.153.100.128. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
1.
Gjersvik  PJNylenna  MAasland  OG Use of the Internet among dermatologists in the United Kingdom, Sweden and Norway.  Dermatol Online J 2002;81PubMedGoogle Scholar
2.
Casserly  MByrd  J Web citation availability: analysis and implications for scholarship.  Coll Res Libr 2003;64300- 317Google Scholar
3.
Currò  VBuonuomo  PSDe Rose  POnesimo  RVituzzi  AD’Atri  A The evolution of Web-based medical information on sore throat: a longitudinal study.  J Med Internet Res 2003;5e10http://www.jmir.org/2003/2/e10Accessed May 9, 2006PubMedGoogle Scholar
4.
Wren  JD 404 not found: the stability and persistence of URLs published in MEDLINE.  Bioinformatics 2004;20668- 672PubMedGoogle Scholar
5.
Lawrence  SCoetzee  FGlover  E  et al.  Persistence of Web references in scientific research.  IEEE Comput 2001;3426- 31Google Scholar
6.
Koehler  W Web page change and persistence: a four-year longitudinal study.  J Am Soc Inf Sci 2002;53162- 171Google Scholar
7.
Dellavalle  RPHester  EJHeilig  LF  et al.  Information science: going, going, gone: lost Internet references.  Science 2003;302787- 788PubMedGoogle Scholar
8.
Schafer  KWeibel  SJul  E The PURL project.  J Libr Adm 2001;34123http://digitalarchive.oclc.org/da/ViewObject.jsp?objid=0000003338Accessed November 14, 2005Google Scholar
9.
Hester  EJHeilig  LFDrake  AL  et al.  Internet citations in oncology journals: a vanishing resource?  J Natl Cancer Inst 2004;96969- 971PubMedGoogle Scholar
10.
Kahle  B Preserving the Internet.  Sci Am 1997;27682- 83PubMedGoogle Scholar
11.
Spinellis  D The decay and failures of Web references.  Commun ACM 2003;4671- 77Google Scholar
12.
Wren  JD Open access and openly accessible: a study of scientific publications shared via the Internet.  BMJ 2005;3301128Accessed May 9, 2006PubMeddoi:10.1136/bmj.38422.611736.E0Google Scholar
13.
Twist  J Web tool may banish broken links. http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/3666660.stmAccessed November 14, 2005
14.
Caplan  P DOI or don't we? http://info.lib.uh.edu/pr/v9/n1/capl9n1.htmlAccessed November 14, 2005
15.
Schilling  LMKelly  DPDrake  ALHeilig  LFHester  EJDellavalle  RP Digital information archiving policies in high-impact medical and scientific periodicals.  JAMA 2004;2922724- 2726PubMedGoogle Scholar
16.
Johnson  KRHester  EJSchilling  LMDellavalle  RP Addressing Internet reference loss.  Lancet 2004;363660- 661PubMedGoogle Scholar
17.
Kelly  DPHester  EJJohnson  KR  et al.  Avoiding URL reference degradation in scientific publications.  PLoS Biol 2004;2e99PubMeddoi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0020099Google Scholar
18.
Schilling  LMWren  JDDellavalle  RP Bioinformatics leads charge by publishing more Internet addresses in abstracts than any other journal [letter].  Bioinformatics 2004;202903PubMeddoi:10.1093/bioinformatics/bth385Google Scholar
Study
September 2006

Uniform Resource Locator Decay in Dermatology Journals: Author Attitudes and Preservation Practices

Author Affiliations

Author Affiliations: Department of Botany and Microbiology, Advanced Center for Genome Technology, University of Oklahoma, Norman (Dr Wren); Departments of Dermatology (Drs Johnson and Dellavalle and Ms Heilig), Preventive Medicine and Biometrics (Ms Heilig and Dr Schilling), and Medicine (Dr Schilling), University of Colorado at Denver and Health Sciences Center, Aurora; Colorado School of Mines, Golden (Mr Crockett); and Dermatology Service, Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Denver (Dr Dellavalle).

Arch Dermatol. 2006;142(9):1147-1152. doi:10.1001/archderm.142.9.1147
Abstract

Objectives  To describe dermatology journal uniform resource locator (URL) use and persistence and to better understand the level of control and awareness of authors regarding the availability of the URLs they cite.

Design  Software was written to automatically access URLs in articles published between January 1, 1999, and September 30, 2004, in the 3 dermatology journals with the highest scientific impact. Authors of publications with unavailable URLs were surveyed regarding URL content, availability, and preservation.

Main Outcome Measures  Uniform resource locator use and persistence and author opinions and practices.

Results  The percentage of articles containing at least 1 URL increased from 2.3% in 1999 to 13.5% in 2004. Of the 1113 URLs, 81.7% were available (decreasing with time since publication from 89.1% of 2004 URLs to 65.4% of 1999 URLs) (P<.001). Uniform resource locator unavailability was highest in The Journal of Investigative Dermatology (22.1%) and lowest in the Archives of Dermatology (14.8%) (P=.03). Some content was partially recoverable via the Internet Archive for 120 of the 204 unavailable URLs. Most authors (55.2%) agreed that the unavailable URL content was important to the publication, but few controlled URL availability personally (5%) or with the help of others (employees, colleagues, and friends) (6.7%).

Conclusions  Uniform resource locators are increasingly used and lost in dermatology journals. Loss will continue until better preservation policies are adopted.

×