Context
Beginning in 1957, patients have been described with localized alopecia characterized histopathologically by mucin deposition within hair follicles (follicular mucinosis [FM]). At least 2 distinct diagnostic entities have been proposed: one occurring in children and young adults without association with other diseases ("idiopathic" FM), the other occurring in elderly patients and associated with mycosis fungoides or Sézary syndrome ("lymphoma-associated" FM).
Objective
To determine whether idiopathic and lymphoma-associated FM are distinct or related entities.
Design
Case series.
Setting
Department of Dermatology, University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
Patients
Forty-four patients with FM were divided into 2 groups. Group 1 comprised 16 patients (mean age, 37.5 years) with no associated mycosis fungoides or Sézary syndrome; group 2 was made up of the other 28 (mean age, 52.2 years), who had clinicopathologic evidence of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma.
Results
Mean age was lower in patients with idiopathic FM, but a considerable overlapping among the 2 groups was present. Location on the head and neck region was common in both groups, but most patients with lymphoma-associated FM had lesions also on other body sites. In fact, solitary lesions at presentation were common in patients with idiopathic FM (11 [68.8%] of 16 patients), but uncommon in those with lymphoma-associated FM (2 [7.1%] of 28 patients). Histopathologic findings did not allow clear-cut differentiation of the 2 groups. Finally, a monoclonal rearrangement of the T-cell receptor γ gene was demonstrated by polymerase chain reaction analysis in about 50% of tested cases from each group.
Conclusions
Criteria previously reported to differentiate idiopathic from lymphoma-associated FM proved ineffective. In analogy to localized pagetoid reticulosis (Woringer-Kolopp disease), small-plaque parapsoriasis, and so-called solitary mycosis fungoides, idiopathic FM may represent a form of localized cutaneous T-cell lymphoma.
IN 1957, Hermann Pinkus1 described a group of 6 patients with localized alopecia characterized histopathologically by mucin deposition within hair follicles. In the following years, the term follicular mucinosis (FM) proposed by Jablonska et al2 in 1959 slowly replaced alopecia mucinosa, the designation originally coined by Pinkus himself. Subsequent reports suggested that at least 2 distinct entities were encompassed under this diagnosis: one occurring in children and young adults without association with other cutaneous or extracutaneous diseases ("idiopathic" FM), the other occurring in elderly patients and associated with mycosis fungoides or Sézary syndrome ("lymphoma-associated" FM).3-13 In addition, progression of idiopathic FM into cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL) has been well documented in several cases.14-18
In this study, we reviewed data from a large group of patients with idiopathic and lymphoma-associated FM with respect to clinicopathologic presentation and molecular features.
Data from 44 patients with FM were retrieved from the files of the Department of Dermatology of the University of Graz, in Austria. Patients were divided into 2 groups according to clinicopathologic features: 16 patients had no evidence of mycosis fungoides or Sézary syndrome at presentation and did not develop CTCL in the follow-up time (group 1, idiopathic FM); the other 28 had clinicopathologic evidence of mycosis fungoides or Sézary syndrome at presentation or developed CTCL in the follow-up time (group 2, lymphoma-associated FM). Diagnosis of mycosis fungoides and Sézary syndrome was made according to criteria published in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) classification for cutaneous lymphomas.19
Histologic characteristics
In all cases, one or more biopsy specimens were available for review of histopathologic features. Hematoxylin-eosin, periodic acid–Schiff, colloidal-iron, and Giemsa stains were available for histologic review of biospy specimens.
Immunohistologic characteristics
In 30 cases where enough material was available, complete immunophenotypical studies were performed using a standard 3-step immunoperoxidase technique.20 Antigen retrieval was performed for most of the antibodies with a standard heat-retrieval technique.
Molecular biologic characteristics
Analysis of the T-cell receptor γ (TCRγ) gene rearrangement was performed on formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue sections in 30 cases where enough material was available. Isolation of DNA was performed with standard methods. Briefly, five 5-µm sections were cut from each biopsy specimen and coated on slides. To avoid cross contamination, the blade of the microtome was changed after cutting each sample. Slides were subsequently deparaffinized by xylene and ethanol. After air drying, sections were scraped off the slides and resuspended in 50 to 100 µL of digestion buffer (100mM of Tris-hydrochloride, pH 8.0; and 1 µg/µL of Proteinase K [Boehringer Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany]), depending on the size of the specimen. After incubation at 55°C for 24 hours, samples were heated to 94° for 15 minutes and stored at −20°C.
The TCRγ gene was analyzed using the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) technique as described by McCarthy et al,21 with minor modifications. Briefly, 2% to 5% of total template DNA was used in a 50-µL PCR reaction containing primers Vγ11 (250 nM), Vγ101 (250 nM), Jγ11 (500 nM), Jp12 (500nM), dinucleotide triphosphate (200µM each), magnesium chloride (1.5mM), potassium chloride (50mM), Tris-hydrochloride at pH 8.3 (10mM), and AmpliTaq Gold DNA Polymerase (Perkin Elmer, Branchburg, NJ). After initial heating at 94°C for 10 minutes, 40 cycles of the reaction were carried out (denaturation, 94°C for 60 minutes; annealing, 50°C for 30 minutes; extension, 72°C for 30 min). A 10-µL Aliquot of the PCR products was then run on a 3.5% MetaPhor agarose gel (FMC BioProducts, Rockland, Mass), stained with ethidium bromide, and viewed under UV light. The β-actin gene was analyzed as internal control in all cases.
Clinicopathologic and molecular features for patients with idiopathic FM are summarized in Table 1. Sixteen patients had FM without signs of CTCL or other cutaneous or extracutaneous diseases (M/F, 1.3:1; mean age, 37.5 years; median age, 40 years; range, 13-61 years). Patients presented with solitary (n = 11) or multiple (n = 5) folliculotropic patches or plaques (Figure 1). Lesions were located on the face and neck in 15 patients and on the trunk in 1. No patient had generalized lesions. Histologic analysis revealed mucin deposits within the hair follicles in all cases. The amount of mucin varied in different cases, and in different hair follicles in the same case. A varying amount of eosinophils could be observed in 11 of 16 cases.
In 6 cases, there was a dense lymphoid infiltrate and great numbers of lymphocytes around and within affected hair follicles (Figure 2). Some lymphocytes had hyperchromatic, folded nuclei (small to medium-sized pleomorphic lymphocytes). Epidermotropism was not observed. These cases were not classified as lymphoma-associated FM because of the lack of clinicopathologic features of CTCL.
The other 10 cases showed only a mild lymphocytic infiltrate around hair follicles with scattered intrafollicular lymphocytes (Figure 3). Immunohistologic analysis performed in 11 cases revealed that the great majority of the lymphocytes had a T-helper phenotype. Molecular analysis showed the presence of a monoclonal rearrangement of the TCRγ gene in 6 of 11 cases analyzed (Figure 4).
The mean follow-up time was 71.6 months (range, 5-242 months; median, 22 months). All patients were alive, and no one developed mycosis fungoides or other CTCLs by the last follow-up examination. Seven patients are currently in complete remission (mean follow-up, 148.6 months; range: 29-242 months), whereas the other 9 show residual disease (mean follow-up, 11.7 months; range 5-25 months).
Twenty-eight patients had FM associated with mycosis fungoides (n = 26) or Sézary syndrome (n = 2) in different stages (M/F, 2.5:1; mean age, 52.2 years; median age, 53 years; age range, 32-74 years) (Table 2). At first presentation, patients had solitary (n = 2) or multiple (n = 20) patches or plaques covering less than 10% of the body surface (Figure 5). Two patients with Sézary syndrome had erythroderma, and 4 with mycosis fungoides had generalized patches and plaques covering more than 10% of the body surface. Histopathologically, all cases revealed varying amounts of mucin within 1 or more hair follicles. Varying numbers of eosinophils could be observed in 19 of 28 cases. Seventeen of 28 cases showed histopathologic features of CTCL, including the presence of focal epidermotropism of lymphocytes within the epidermis between the hair follicles (Figure 6). Clear-cut Pautrier microabscesses, however, were seen only in a minority of the cases. Some lymphocytes in the dermis had hyperchromatic, folded nuclei (small- to medium-sized pleomorphic lymphocytes), but atypical cells never represented the majority of the infiltrate.
In 2 patients (patients 22 and 33), a biopsy specimen taken at presentation showed a dense lymphoid infiltrate around and within hair follicles, but no evidence of epidermotropism. In 1 of these 2 patients (patient 33) a second biopsy specimen taken at the same time showed features of mycosis fungoides without FM. The last 9 cases revealed a histopathologic picture characterized by mucin deposits in the hair follicles with only a mild lymphoid infiltrate (Figure 7). In 10 of the last 11 patients, the initial diagnosis was idiopathic FM (patients 18, 22, 25, 27, 28, 31, 35, 39, 42, and 44), and the diagnosis of CTCL was made only after analysis of specimens from repeated biopsies done over different periods of time (mostly within a few weeks or months; in patients 25 and 39, after 2 and 15 years, respectively).
Immunohistologic analysis performed in 19 cases showed the predominance of cells with a T-helper phenotype. Molecular analysis showed the presence of a monoclonal population of T lymphocytes in 9 of 19 cases analyzed (Figure 4). Seven patients died of their disease after a mean survival time of 125 months (range, 19-262 months). After a mean follow-up of 60.9 months (range, 2-221 months; median, 48 months), 19 patients are alive and in complete (n = 2) or partial (n = 11) remission or with progressive disease (n = 6). Two further patients with progressive disease died of unrelated causes after 48 and 59 months, respectively.
Follicular mucinosis is an epithelial reaction pattern characterized by the accumulation of mucin within hair follicles.22 It occurs in a number of inflammatory, infectious, and neoplastic skin conditions, and in this context cannot be considered a specific skin disease.22-34 Although it is generally accepted that the disease was first described by Pinkus1 in 1957, in the same year Braun-Falco35 reported an identical condition, and a patient with similar clinicopathologic features had already been observed by Lehner and Szodoray36 in 1939.
After the report by Pinkus, several publications proposed the existence of 2 main types of FM.3-13,37-43 The first type occurs in young patients in the absence of concomitant cutaneous or extracutaneous disorders and shows localized lesions with a tendency to resolve within a few years (idiopathic FM). The second type occurs in elderly patients and is associated with mycosis fungoides or Sézary syndrome.
A third type of FM presenting with clinicopathologic features of both of the other 2 groups has also been described (the so-called persistent or chronic benign FM).3,15 The existence of this distinct third type is questionable. In fact, cases classified within this third group probably represent examples of lymphoma-associated FM. For example, one child described by Gibson et al44 in 1988 had widespread lesions on the trunk and extremities recurring for 17 years in spite of various treatments including systemic chemotherapy, radiotherapy, topical nitrogen mustard, and psoralen plus UV-A therapy. Analysis of specimens from 2 biopsies taken at presentation led to a diagnosis of lymphosarcoma, and the clinical features were consistent with mycosis fungoides.
Classification of cases like this one as persistent FM has contributed to the confusion existing in this field. Moreover, even the prognosis of idiopathic FM is not well elucidated, and several cases showing "transformation" into mycosis fungoides or other CTCLs have been reported.3-18 We have demonstrated here that no clear-cut criteria allow the differentiation of idiopathic from lymphoma-associated FM, and we propose that idiopathic FM may belong to the variant forms of mycosis fungoides that show a prolonged, nonaggressive clinical course (Table 3).
It has been suggested that the age of the patient, location of the lesion(s), and histopathologic features of the infiltrate may provide clues to help differentiate idiopathic from lymphoma-associated FM.3,8,9,45 Another criterion proposed as helpful in the differential diagnosis is the molecular analysis of the TCRγ gene rearrangement.46 However, several authors have pointed out the difficulty, or even impossibility, of clearly distinguishing the 2 groups.4,6,47
We shall address these proposed distinguishing features one at a time, beginning with patient age. The mean age in our study was indeed lower in patients with idiopathic FM than in those with lymphoma-associated FM, but there was a considerable overlap between the 2 groups. Moreover, although mycosis fungoides is predominantly a disease of elderly patients, several cases have been reported in children, with or without FM.48-52 Thus, it is not possible to exclude a diagnosis of mycosis fungoides solely on the basis of the age of the patient.
As for lesion location, lesions were present on the face and neck in most patients from both groups, but patients with lymphoma-associated FM showed often concomitant lesions on other areas of the body. In this context, it should be stressed that, contrary to previous suggestions, lymphoma-associated FM is commonly located on the face and neck region,17,19,53,54 and some patients presenting with isolated lesions of FM on the face afterwards have developed clear-cut mycosis fungoides.53,55 In short, location alone cannot be considered a valid discriminatory factor.
On the other hand, solitary vs multiple lesions might be a distinguishing characteristic. In our series, solitary lesions at presentation were common in patients with idiopathic FM (11 [68.8%] of 16 patients), but uncommon in those with lymphoma-associated FM (2 [7.1%] of 28 cases). The presence of solitary as opposed to multiple lesions, therefore, might be a distinguishing feature between the 2 groups. However, it should be noted that mycosis fungoides can present with solitary lesions.56-58 Moreover, a case of folliculotropic mycosis fungoides (though without clear-cut FM) has also been documented with a solitary lesion,59 and one of idiopathic FM with generalized lesions has been reported as well,60 again underlying the overlapping clinical features of these 2 entities.
Remarkably, in our study histopathologic analysis did not provide useful clues to differentiate the 2 groups of patients, confirming previous observations.6,9 In fact, in the group of lymphoma-associated FM, 9 (32.1%) of the 28 patients showed histopathologic features suggestive of idiopathic FM, and 2 more presented with dense lymphoid infiltrates but without epidermotropism of lymphocytes. Conversely, in the idiopathic FM group, 6 (37.5%) of 16 patients revealed skin lesions with dense lymphoid infiltrates unusual for this type of FM and suggestive of a cutaneous lymphoproliferative process. Similar dense lymphoid infiltrates have been reported in patients with idiopathic FM, which underscores the overlapping histopathologic features between the 2 groups.1,6,22,47,61
The amount of mucin deposits within hair follicles and the presence of eosinophils within the infiltrate were similar in the 2 groups. It is also of interest to note that in 10 cases (35.7%) of lymphoma-associated FM, the diagnosis of CTCL was not made at presentation, and skin lesions were originally classified as idiopathic FM before analysis of sequential biopsy specimens proved the nature of the infiltrate. A similar case was recently described by Bonta et al.62 These cases would previously have been classified as idiopathic or persistent FM with transformation into CTCL, but we agree with Hempstead and Ackerman22 that they most likely represent examples of cases where mycosis fungoides or Sézary syndrome was present from the beginning.
In our study, the immunophenotype was also similar in both groups, and even PCR analysis of the infiltrate could not help differentiate the 2 types. In fact, a monoclonal rearrangement of the TCRγ gene could be identified in 6 (54.5%) of 11 and 9 (47.4%) of 19 cases of idiopathic and lymphoma-associated FM, respectively, indicating that a monoclonal population of T lymphocytes can be detected in about half of the cases in both groups. These data are in contrast to those reported by Meehan et al,46 who found no monoclonality in 5 patients with idiopathic FM, but confirm previous observations describing a monoclonal population of T lymphocytes in cases of idiopathic FM.46,61,63,64
Besides mycosis fungoides and Sézary syndrome, Hodgkin disease has also been observed in association with FM in several patients.8,44,65-67 However, the association of Hodgkin disease with mycosis fungoides is well known,68 and it might be that in at least some of these patients, cutaneous changes represented lesions of mycosis fungoides–associated FM. Indeed, most patients showed clinical presentations uncommon for idiopathic FM: One child described by Gibson et al44 had a widespread skin eruption involving the upper and lower extremities as well as the face; the child described by Kim and Winkelmann8 had multiple lesions on the arms and legs; the patient described by Stewart and Smoller67 had lesions on both legs; and the one described by Ramon et al65 had multiple lesions on the chest.
One of the main problems in studying patients with FM is the bias introduced by classifying them into one of the 2 main diagnostic groups. In fact, depending on the definition of idiopathic and lymphoma-associated FM in the given case, some patients may be classified into either of the groups, thus causing diagnostic confusion. We used clinicopathologic evidence of CTCL at presentation or during follow-up as the only distinguishing criterion to try to identify a group of patients with benign as opposed to malignant disease. Nevertheless, there was a considerable overlap in clinical presentation, histopathologic features, and molecular data between the 2 groups.
It may be argued that our follow-up for some of the patients with idiopathic FM was too short to rule out lymphoma-associated FM. However, even considering only the 5 patients with more than 9 years of follow-up in the idiopathic FM group (patients 4, 5, 7, 8, and 15; mean follow-up: 191.8 months; range: 111-242 months), a similar overlapping of clinicopathologic features was observed (mean age at onset, 41.6 years; age at onset range, 21-61 years; histologic findings suggestive of CTCL in 2 [40.0%] of 5 cases; monoclonality found in 2 [50%] of 4 tested cases).
At this point, one must question whether idiopathic and lymphoma-associated FM are unrelated diseases (ie, represent 2 completely distinct clinicopathologic entities) or rather different names for a single disease with a variable spectrum of clinicopathologic presentations and outcomes. In this context, it should be noted that several variants of mycosis fungoides with prolonged, nonaggressive clinical course have been described, such as unilesional (solitary) mycosis fungoides, localized pagetoid reticulosis (Woringer-Kolopp disease), and parapsoriasis en plaques.54,56-58 Moreover, it has also been recognized that most patients with mycosis fungoides experience a chronic disease with prolonged survival.19,54,69,70 Our results, and findings from review of the literature, suggest that idiopathic FM may represent a variant of mycosis fungoides with localized disease and excellent prognosis, conceptually similar to the localized variant of pagetoid reticulosis (Woringer-Kolopp disease). Regardless of the classification of these cases as "indolent" CTCL or benign inflammatory dermatitis, patients with so-called idiopathic FM should be observed carefully for long periods of time.
Accepted for publication June 18, 2001.
Corresponding author and reprints: Lorenzo Cerroni, MD, Department of Dermatology, University of Graz, Auenbruggerplatz, 8, A-8036 Graz, Austria (e-mail: lorenzo.cerroni@kfunigraz.ac.at).
1.Pinkus
H Alopecia mucinosa: inflammatory plaques with alopecia characterized by root-sheath mucinosis.
Arch Dermatol. 1957;76419- 424
Google ScholarCrossref 2.Jablonska
SChorzelski
TLancucki
J Mucinosis follicularis.
Hautarzt. 1959;1027- 33
Google Scholar 5.Felman
YMShapiro
LMoser
HS Alopecia mucinosa and malignant lymphoma.
Dermatologica. 1969;138444- 452
Google ScholarCrossref 6.Gibson
LEMuller
SALeiferman
KMPeters
MS Follicular mucinosis: clinical and histopathologic study.
J Am Acad Dermatol. 1989;20441- 446
Google ScholarCrossref 9.Nickoloff
BJWood
C Benign idiopathic versus mycosis-fungoides-associated follicular mucinosis.
Pediatr Dermatol. 1985;2201- 206
Google ScholarCrossref 12.Pinkus
H The relationship of alopecia mucinosa to malignant lymphoma.
Dermatologica. 1964;129266- 270
Google ScholarCrossref 13.Plotnick
HAbbrecht
M Alopecia mucinosa and lymphoma: report of two cases and review of literature.
Arch Dermatol. 1965;92137- 141
Google ScholarCrossref 14.Bazex
ASalvador
RDupre
A
et al. Follicular mucinosis: appearance of malignant reticulosis after 20 years of evolution.
Bull Soc Fr Dermatol Syphiligr. 1969;76544- 545
Google Scholar 15.Brunsting
LAKierland
RRPerry
HOWinkelmann
RK Alopecia mucinosa with transition to mycosis fungoides.
Arch Dermatol. 1962;85683- 684
Google Scholar 16.Kanno
SNiizuma
KMachida
S
et al. Follicular mucinosis developing into cutaneous lymphoma: report of two cases and review of literature and 64 cases in Japan.
Acta Derm Venereol (Stockh). 1984;6486- 88
Google Scholar 17.Sentis
HJWillemze
RScheffer
E Alopecia mucinosa progressing into mycosis fungoides: a long-term follow-up study of two patients.
Am J Dermatopathol. 1988;10478- 486
Google ScholarCrossref 18.Teepe
RCGvan Vloten
WA Transition of follicular mucinosis into mycosis fungoides.
Br J Dermatol. 1985;113490- 491
Google Scholar 19.Willemze
RKerl
HSterry
W
et al. EORTC classification for primary cutaneous lymphomas: a proposal from the cutaneous lymphoma study group of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer.
Blood. 1997;90354- 371
Google Scholar 20.Cerroni
LSmolle
JSoyer
HPMartinez Aparicio
AKerl
H Immunophenotyping of cutaneous lymphoid infiltrates in frozen and paraffin-embedded tissue sections: a comparative study.
J Am Acad Dermatol. 1990;22405- 413
Google ScholarCrossref 21.McCarthy
KPSloane
JPKabarowski
JHSMatutes
EWiedemann
LM A simplified method of detection of clonal rearrangements of the T-cell receptor-gamma chain gene.
Diagn Mol Pathol. 1992;1173- 179
Google Scholar 22.Hempstead
RWAckerman
AB Follicular mucinosis: a reaction pattern in follicular epithelium.
Am J Dermatopathol. 1985;7245- 257
Google ScholarCrossref 23.Abajo
PMartin
RDauden
E Follicular mucinosis associated with cutaneous leishmaniasis [letter].
Acta Derm Venereol (Stockh). 1998;78315
Google ScholarCrossref 24.Alagheband
MCairns
MLChuang
TY Xanthoerythrodermia perstans and alopecia mucinosa in a patient with CD30 cutaneous T-cell lymphoma.
Cutis. 1997;6041- 42
Google Scholar 25.Benchikhi
HWechsler
JRethers
L
et al. Cutaneous B-cell lymphoma associated with follicular mucinosis.
J Am Acad Dermatol. 1995;33673- 675
Google ScholarCrossref 26.Buezo
GFFraga
JAbajo
PRios
LDauden
EGarcia
DA HIV-associated eosinophilic folliculitis and follicular mucinosis.
Dermatology. 1998;197178- 180
Google ScholarCrossref 27.Dawn
GHanda
SKumar
B Follicular mucinosis and systemic lupus erythematosus.
Dermatology. 1997;195183- 184
Google ScholarCrossref 28.Freeman
RG Familial reticuloendotheliosis with eosinophilia and follicular mucinosis.
Arch Dermatol. 1972;105737- 738
Google ScholarCrossref 29.Jordaan
HF Follicular mucinosis in association with a melanocytic nevus: a report of two cases.
J Cutan Pathol. 1987;14122- 126
Google ScholarCrossref 30.Nickoloff
BJ Lentigo maligna with follicular mucinosis.
Am J Dermatopathol. 1985;7
(suppl)
232- 233
Google Scholar 31.Rongioletti
FRebora
A Follicular mucinosis in exaggerated arthropod-bite reactions of patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia.
J Am Acad Dermatol. 1999;41500
Google ScholarCrossref 32.Summer
WTGrichnik
JMShea
CRMoore
JOMiller
WSBurton
CS Follicular mucinosis as a presenting sign of acute myeloblastic leukemia.
J Am Acad Dermatol. 1998;39803- 805
Google ScholarCrossref 33.Thomson
JCochran
REI Chronic lymphatic leukemia presenting as atypical rosacea with follicular mucinosis.
J Cutan Pathol. 1978;581- 87
Google ScholarCrossref 34.Wolff
HHKinney
JAckerman
AB Angiolymphoid hyperplasia with follicular mucinosis.
Arch Dermatol. 1978;114229- 232
Google ScholarCrossref 35.Braun-Falco
O Mucophanerosis intrafollicularis et seboglandularis.
Dermatol Wochenschr. 1957;1361289- 1303
Google Scholar 36.Lehner
ESzodoray
L Ein ungewöhnlicher, sich durch entzündliches Follikularödem auszeichnender Hautausschlag.
Dermatol Wochenschr. 1939;108679- 685
Google Scholar 37.Büchner
SAMeier
MRufli
T Follicular mucinosis associated with mycosis fungoides.
Dermatologica. 1991;18366- 67
Google ScholarCrossref 38.Fairris
GMKirkham
NGoodwin
PGLeppard
BJWhite
JE Erythrodermic follicular mucinosis.
Clin Exp Dermatol. 1987;1250- 52
Google ScholarCrossref 39.Findlay
GHLöwenthal
LJA Alopecia mucinosa with eosinophilic granuloma, lichen spinulosus and chancriform lesions.
Dermatologica. 1960;120263- 274
Google ScholarCrossref 40.LeBoit
PEAbel
EACleary
ML
et al. Clonal rearrangement of the T-cell receptor beta gene in the circulating lymphocytes of erythrodermic follicular mucinosis.
Blood. 1988;711329- 1333
Google Scholar 41.Pereyo
NGRequena
LGalloway
JSangueza
OP Follicular mycosis fungoides: a clinicohistopathologic study.
J Am Acad Dermatol. 1997;36563- 568
Google ScholarCrossref 42.Rivers
JKNorris
PGGreaves
MWSmith
NP Follicular mucinosis in association with Sézary syndrome.
Clin Exp Dermatol. 1987;12207- 210
Google ScholarCrossref 44.Gibson
LEMuller
SAPeters
MS Follicular mucinosis of childhood and adolescence.
Pediatr Dermatol. 1988;5231- 235
Google ScholarCrossref 45.Mehregan
DAGibson
LEMuller
SA Follicular mucinosis: histopathologic review of 33 cases.
Mayo Clin Proc. 1991;66387- 390
Google ScholarCrossref 46.Meehan
SJensen
KKim
YKohler
S Use of polymerase chain reaction heteroduplex analysis in the evaluation of follicular mucinosis [abstract].
J Cutan Pathol. 1999;26458
Google Scholar 47.Lancer
HABronstein
BRNakagawa
HBhan
AKMihm
MC
Jr Follicular mucinosis: a detailed morphologic and immunopathologic study.
J Am Acad Dermatol. 1984;10760- 768
Google ScholarCrossref 48.Bittencourt
ALFerras de Castro Dias
NRocha Guimaraes de Souza
LAffonso de Carvalho
W Mycosis fungoides associated with follicular mucinosis in an adolescent.
Med Cutan Ibero Lat Am. 1990;18167- 169
Google Scholar 49.Burns
MKEllis
CNCooper
KD Mycosis fungoides-type cutaneous T-cell lymphoma arising before 30 years of age.
J Am Acad Dermatol. 1992;27974- 978
Google ScholarCrossref 50.Hess Schmid
MDummer
RKempf
WHilty
NBurg
G Mycosis fungoides with mucinosis follicularis in childhood.
Dermatology. 1999;198284- 287
Google ScholarCrossref 51.Hickham
PRMcBurney
EIFitzgerald
RL CTCL in patients under 20 years of age: a series of five cases.
Pediatr Dermatol. 1997;1493- 97
Google ScholarCrossref 52.Peters
MSThibodeau
SNWhite
JW
JrWinkelmann
RK Mycosis fungoides in children and adolescents.
J Am Acad Dermatol. 1990;221011- 1018
Google ScholarCrossref 53.Binnick
ANWax
FDClendenning
WE Alopecia mucinosa of the face associated with mycosis fungoides.
Arch Dermatol. 1978;114791- 792
Google ScholarCrossref 54.Cerroni
LKerl
HGatter
K An Illustrated Guide to Skin Lymphomas. Oxford, England Blackwell Science1998;
55.Wilkinson
JDBlack
MMChu
A Follicular mucinosis associated with mycosis fungoides presenting with gross cystic changes on the face.
Clin Exp Dermatol. 1982;7333- 339
Google ScholarCrossref 56.Cerroni
LFink-Puches
REl-Shabrawi-Caelen
L
et al. Solitary skin lesions with histopathologic features of early mycosis fungoides.
Am J Dermatopathol. 1999;21518- 524
Google ScholarCrossref 57.Oliver
GFWinkelmann
RK Unilesional mycosis fungoides: a distinct entity.
J Am Acad Dermatol. 1989;2063- 70
Google ScholarCrossref 58.Ringel
EMedenica
MLorincz
A Localized mycosis fungoides not manifesting as Woringer-Kolopp disease.
Arch Dermatol. 1983;119756- 760
Google ScholarCrossref 59.Marzano
AVBerti
ELupica
LAlessi
E Unilesional follicular mycosis fungoides.
Dermatology. 1999;199174- 176
Google ScholarCrossref 60.Trüeb
RBruckner
TL Generalized follicular mucinosis.
Hautarzt. 1990;41625- 627
Google Scholar 61.Wittenberg
GPGibson
LEPittelkow
MRel-Azhary
RA Follicular mucinosis presenting as an acneiform eruption: report of four cases.
J Am Acad Dermatol. 1998;38849- 851
Google ScholarCrossref 62.Bonta
MDTannous
ZSDemierre
MFGonzalez
EHarris
NLDuncan
LM Rapidly progressing mycosis fungoides presenting as follicular mucinosis.
J Am Acad Dermatol. 2000;43635- 640
Google ScholarCrossref 63.Pujol
RMAlonso
JGibson
LEPittelkow
MRSchroeter
AL Follicular mucinosis: clinicopathologic evaluation and genotypic analysis of 25 cases, with clonality evaluation by TCR gamma chain PCR amplification [abstract].
J Cutan Pathol. 1996;2358
Google Scholar 64.Zelickson
BDPeters
MSMuller
SA
et al. T-cell receptor gene rearrangement analysis: cutaneous T-cell lymphoma, peripheral T-cell lymphoma, and premalignant and benign cutaneous lymphoproliferative disorders.
J Am Acad Dermatol. 1991;25787- 796
Google ScholarCrossref 65.Ramon
DJorda
EMolina
I
et al. Follicular mucinosis and Hodgkin's disease.
Int J Dermatol. 1992;31791- 792
Google ScholarCrossref 66.Stankler
LEwen
SWB Hodgkin's disease in a patient with follicular and dermal mucinosis and spontaneous ooze of mucin (mucinorrhea).
Br J Dermatol. 1975;93581- 586
Google ScholarCrossref 67.Stewart
MSmoller
BR Follicular mucinosis in Hodgkin's disease: a poor prognostic sign?
J Am Acad Dermatol. 1991;24784- 785
Google ScholarCrossref 68.Caya
JGChoi
HTieu
TMWollenberg
NJAlmagro
UA Hodgkin's disease followed by mycosis fungoides in the same patient: case report and review of the literature.
Cancer. 1984;53463- 467
Google ScholarCrossref 69.Alapati
UAckerman
AB Mycosis fungoides increasing in incidence?
Dermatopathol Pract Concept. 1995;1117- 119
Google Scholar 70.King-Ismael
DAckerman
AB Guttate parapsoriasis/digitate dermatosis (small plaque parapsoriasis) is mycosis fungoides.
Am J Dermatopathol. 1992;14518- 530
Google ScholarCrossref