Background
Lentigo maligna (LM) is a form of melanoma in situ most often seen in white patients on sun-exposed areas, primarily the head and neck. Spread of LM onto the conjunctiva has been reported. There have been no reports of LM extending onto oral mucosa.
Observations
We report 4 cases of LM in white women with contiguous spread from perioral areas to oral mucosa. The locations of the primary lesions were the vermilion of the lip, vermilion and perioral skin, cheek, and cutaneous aspect of the lip. Three cases showed focal histopathologic evidence of invasion during the course of the disease. The lesions ran a prolonged course characterized by repeated recurrences after surgery. Three of the cases required a complicated reconstruction after surgical excision. Mohs surgery with rush permanent (paraffin-embedded) sections resulted in a long remission in 2 cases, while in 1 patient, treatment with carbon dioxide laser was unsuccessful.
Conclusions
In a perioral distribution, LM can spread onto oral mucosa. This clinical presentation may cause significant long-term morbidity, as indicated by a high recurrence rate and/or progression to invasive melanoma. The oral mucosa should be examined in patients with atypical pigmented perioral lesions.
LENTIGO MALIGNA (LM) is a type of melanoma in situ with unique clinical and histopathologic features.1 It occurs almost exclusively in whites and shows a slight female preponderance.2 Lentigo maligna usually presents as a poorly circumscribed, variably colored patch on sun-exposed areas, primarily the head and neck. The cheek is the most common site. The margins of LM are often difficult to evaluate as a result of mottled pigmentation and a background of solar lentigines and chronic photodamage.2 Long-term cumulative UV radiation is the most widely recognized risk factor for the development of LM.3,4
Lentigo maligna melanoma (LMM), the invasive form of LM, is the most common subtype of malignant melanoma on the face.5 Lentigo maligna occurs less commonly on the trunk and extremities. Lesions previously reported on the subungual area,6,7 fingers,8,9 toes,10 hand,11 foot,11 scrotum,12 penis,13 and oral mucosa14,15 would be classified today as acral lentiginous melanoma or another histologic type.16,17 The conjunctiva may be involved when LM on the eyelids and/or periorbital areas spreads onto conjunctival mucosa.18-20 A case of melanoma in situ involving the oral mucosa, lips, and perioral skin was reported and was believed to have spread from the oral mucosa to the perioral skin.21 One of us (L.M.C.) recently reported extension of recurrent LM of the cheek onto buccal mucosa (case 3 in this series).22
Herein, we report 4 cases of LM with contiguous spread from perioral skin and/or vermilion of the lip onto oral mucosa. To our knowledge, this clinical presentation has not been previously reported. All patients experienced significant morbidity. We review the complicated course and prognosis of these patients and discuss treatment options and the challenge of permanent cure. The clinical data and response to treatment in the cases studied are summarized in Table 1.
Biopsy specimens of the primary and recurrent lesions (the latter shown in Figure 1 and Figure 2) demonstrated LM. The recurrent lesions were treated with carbon dioxide laser excision followed by peripheral vaporization. The buccal mucosal specimen removed during the laser excision revealed extensive LMM in vertical growth phase with an invasive desmoplastic component and positive margins. Three months later, biopsy specimens from residual pigmented oral lesions taken by repeat laser excision showed residual LM in the oral commissure.
Biopsy specimens of the primary lesion (Figure 3) revealed LM. The lesion was excised with a 5-mm margin using rush permanent sections. The upper lip was repaired with a rhombic flap and the lower lip, with an advancement flap. Two years later, 3 tan to brown pigmented patches were noted on the right buccal mucosa and lower labial mucosa (Figure 4). Biopsy specimens confirmed recurrent LM. Negative margins were obtained after 3 stages of excision with rush permanent sections, and the defect was repaired with a full-thickness skin graft from the groin. No recurrences or new atypical lesions have been noted 5 years after excision.
A biopsy specimen of the primary lesion on the left cheek showed LM. The lesion recurred several times and was excised after each recurrence; advancement flap was used once for the repair. Ten years after the appearance of the primary lesion, a recurrent lesion was noted on the left cheek and oral commissure. This was treated with wide excision and reconstruction with a cervicofacial rotation flap. Pathologic analysis showed a 3-mm-thick LMM, but the margins were ambiguous. Three years later, extensive pigmentation was noted along the scar from the previous cervicofacial flap that involved the advanced portions of the flap and left oral commissure. The tumor extended onto the upper lip, oral commissure, and buccal mucosa. All affected areas were excised using rush permanent sections. The commissure was reconstructed with an intraoral rotation flap, the lower lip with simple undermining and advancement, and the cheek with a prefabricated supraclavicular flap. To date, there have been no recurrences or new atypical lesions.
The primary lesion on the left upper lip extended onto the left oral commissure, vermilion, and labial mucosa of the upper lip, and vermilion of the lower lip. A biopsy specimen showed LM. The lesion was removed with narrow margins, and the subsequent reconstruction used cheek advancement and lip rotation flaps. Within the next 6 years, several recurrent lesions were noted on the left upper lip and melolabial fold. For reconstruction, rotation flaps, a cervicofacial myocutaneous platysma flap, and a myocutaneous orbicularis flap were used. Two years later, a biopsy specimen of another recurrent lesion on the left cheek and upper lip revealed a 0.43-mm-thick LMM. This was excised with a 1-cm margin; a large cheek rotation flap was used for reconstruction. The biopsy specimen showed negative margins. Recently, another recurrent lesion on the left cheek and upper lip was excised twice with positive margins.
All biopsy specimens from LM lesions revealed similar histopathologic features. Microscopic examination from a recurrent lesion from case 4 revealed an atypical intraepidermal melanocytic proliferation over a scar (Figure 5). The pleomorphic melanocytes were arranged as single units and small nests along the dermoepidermal junction. In some areas, there was elongation of the rete ridges, whereas in others, there was epidermal atrophy. Solar elastosis was noted. The atypical cells showed hyperchromatic, enlarged, irregular nuclei and areas of pagetoid spread.
Biopsy specimens from the oral mucosal lesions of case 3 showed a proliferation of solitary, pleomorphic melanocytes with hyperchromatic nuclei along the basal and suprabasal layers (Figure 6). Biopsy specimens from one of the oral lesions of case 1 (shown in Figure 2) demonstrated confluent nests of atypical melanocytes within the lower portion of the epithelium (Figure 7). Focal pagetoid spread was noted. In another biopsy specimen from the buccal mucosa, a dermal spindle cell neoplasm was identified extending from the intraepidermal component. Patchy inflammation and numerous melanophages were seen in the papillary dermis. The lesion was positive for S100, consistent with desmoplastic melanoma.
Lentigo maligna occurs in white patients on sun-exposed areas, predominantly the head and neck. Extension onto mucosal surfaces such as the conjunctiva has been exceptional.18-20 Herein, we report 4 cases of LM with spread from perioral areas onto oral mucosa.
All patients had cutaneous lesions for several years before development of intraoral involvement. The lesions ran a chronic course complicated by several recurrences after surgery. Two of the patients never achieved complete remission, and all experienced significant long-term morbidity. Primary melanoma of the oral cavity can be excluded in our patients primarily by history. Metastatic melanoma from the skin to the oral cavity is extremely rare and can be ruled out by the absence of advanced primary skin tumor. Benign pigmented lesions such as melanocytic nevi, oral melanoacanthomas, and oral and labial melanotic macules can be excluded by the atypical histopathologic features.
The skin lesions showed typical histopathologic features of LM2,23 such as solitary and small nests of atypical melanocytes along the basal layer of the epidermis and adnexal structures, epidermal atrophy, and solar elastosis. Pagetoid spread, melanophages, and a dermal lymphohistiocytic infiltrate were sometimes seen. The histopathologic characteristics of the oral lesions were consistent with contiguous spread of the tumor from perioral skin areas.
Histopathologic evidence of invasion (LMM) was seen in 3 of the 4 patients at some point during their long course. While this is a small sample size, this suggests a higher than previously hypothesized progression of LM to LMM.24 The lesions may have progressed to an invasive stage because of prolonged radial growth phases secondary to incomplete cure after each recurrence. It has been shown that the risk for LMM increases proportionately with lesional diameter.25 Furthermore, LM may have progressed to LMM in areas that were not visible to the patient, thus being unnoticed for long periods of time. As seen in case 1, an invasive component was diagnosed in an oral LM of which the patient was not aware. Although development of invasive areas may occur slowly and gradually, there have been reports of rapid progression to LMM despite careful clinical follow-up.26,27
The recurrence of LM has been attributed to several factors, including migration of malignant melanocytes from adjacent epidermis or migration of deep periadnexal melanocytes to the epidermal surface.1,2 Most authors believe that surgical excision is the treatment of choice, but the optimal surgical management of LM is still being defined. The recurrence rate with standard surgical excision (9%) is lower than that reported with destructive methods (35%-55%).28,29 The failure rate of standard excision may be due to microscopic extension of LM by as much as 1.5 to 3 cm beyond the clinical margins.30,31 In most cases presented herein, conventional surgery, even with wide margins, failed to eradicate the tumor completely and caused significant disfigurement.
The advocates of Mohs micrographic surgery for LM argue that this technique has a high cure rate, spares normal tissue, and allows examination of 100% of surgical margins.32 However, the value of frozen vs rush permanent sections is debatable.31-37 While some authors33 suggest that frozen sections are sensitive and specific for the diagnosis of melanoma, others32 argue that frozen sections contain artifacts and are often difficult to interpret. The use of rush permanent sections34,35 may eliminate these problems but carries the disadvantage that only 1 stage per day can be performed. A recent study32 recommended that if only frozen sections are to be performed, the final stage of surgery should be submitted for analysis of permanent sections prior to closing the wound. This ensures complete removal of the tumor while requiring only 2 to 3 mm of additional tissue. In this study, rush permanent sections were performed in cases 2 and 3 with excellent results.
In summary, we report 4 cases of cutaneous LM with extension onto oral mucosa. The significant morbidity associated with this clinical presentation is highlighted by the numerous recurrences and, in many instances, the need for major reconstruction with subsequent cosmetic disfigurement. This clinical presentation requires a high index of suspicion by the clinician. Examination of the oral mucosa should be performed in all patients with atypical pigmented perioral lesions. Furthermore, patients with perioral LM require long-term follow-up because there is a high probability of recurrence and/or progression to LMM.
Accepted for publication January 24, 2002.
Corresponding author and reprints: Lisa M. Cohen, MD, 320 Needham St, Suite 200, Newton, MA 02464 (e-mail: lcohen@cohenderm.com).
2.Cohen
LM What's new in lentigo maligna.
Adv Dermatol. 1999;15203- 231
Google Scholar 3.Holman
CDJArmstrong
BK Cutaneous malignant melanoma and indicators of total accumulated exposure to the sun: an analysis separating histogenetic types.
J Natl Cancer Inst. 1984;7375- 82
Google Scholar 4.Elwood
JMGallagher
RPWorth
AJWood
WSPearson
JC Etiological differences between subtypes of cutaneous malignant melanoma: Western Canada melanoma study.
J Natl Cancer Inst. 1987;7837- 44
Google Scholar 5.Newell
GRSider
JGBergfelt
LKripke
ML Incidence of cutaneous melanoma in the United States by histology with special reference to the face.
Cancer Res. 1988;485036- 5041
Google Scholar 6.Runne
UTritsch
H Subunguale Lentigo Maligna mit streifenförmiger Nagelpigmentierung: diagnostik und operative Behandlung.
Z Hautkr. 1978;53899- 904
Google Scholar 7.Clouse
WESanders
LJ Subungual lentigo maligna.
Cutis. 1985;36153- 155
Google Scholar 9.Lupulescu
APinkus
HBirmingham
DJUsndek
HEPosch
JL Lentigo maligna of the fingertip: clinical histologic, and ultrastructural studies of two cases.
Arch Dermatol. 1973;107717- 722
Google ScholarCrossref 10.Morishima
TIshikawa
TEndo
MTsujiguchi
Y Pagetoid malignant melanoma and lentigo maligna melanoma of toe: a study with the fluorescence method (Falck and Hillarp).
Arch Dermatol Res. 1978;262275- 283
Google ScholarCrossref 11.Rippey
JJRippey
E Malignant melanoma with adjacent Hutchinson's melanotic freckle in black Africans.
Pathology. 1977;9105- 109
Google ScholarCrossref 13.Aronson
PJWhitney
DHSoltani
KMedencia
M Cryosurgical treatment of dysplastic lentigo of the glans penis.
J Dermatol Surg Oncol. 1984;1060- 62
Google ScholarCrossref 14.de Graciansky
RMouly
RTimsit
EGuilaine
JQueran
JLarregue
M Dubreuilh's melanosis of the buccal mucosa.
Bull Soc Fr Dermatol Syph. 1967;74176- 178
Google Scholar 16.Arrington III
JHReed
RIIchinose
HKrementz
ET Plantar lentiginous melanoma: a distinctive variant of human cutaneous melanoma.
Am J Surg Pathol. 1977;1131- 143
Google ScholarCrossref 17.Paladugu
RRWinberg
CDYonemoto
RH Acral lentiginous melanoma: a clinicopathologic study of 36 patients.
Cancer. 1983;52161- 168
Google ScholarCrossref 18.Cohen
LMZax
RH Recurrent lentigo maligna invading a skin graft successfully treated with Mohs micrographic surgery.
Cutis. 1996;57175- 178
Google Scholar 20.Hicks
CLiu
CHiranandani
MGarner
AHungerford
J Conjunctival melanoma after excision of a lentigo maligna melanoma in the ipsilateral eyelid skin.
Br J Ophthalmol. 1994;78317- 318
Google ScholarCrossref 21.Horiuchi
NTsunoda
TSuetake
TKato
T Oral mucosa malignant melanoma in situ with involvement of the perioral skin.
Dermatology. 1994;18866- 68
Google ScholarCrossref 22.Cohen
LM Mohs surgery for lentigo maligna and melanoma.
Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am. 1998;6309- 317
Google Scholar 23.Cohen
LM The starbust giant cell is useful for distinguishing lentigo maligna from photodamaged skin.
J Am Acad Dermatol. 1996;35962- 968
Google ScholarCrossref 24.Weinstock
MASober
AJ The risk of progression of lentigo maligna to lentigo maligna melanoma.
Br J Dermatol. 1987;116303- 310
Google ScholarCrossref 26.Michalik
EEFitzpatrick
TBSober
AJ Rapid progression of lentigo maligna to deeply invasive lentigo maligna melanoma.
Arch Dermatol. 1983;119831- 835
Google ScholarCrossref 27.Kelly
JW Following lentigo maligna may not prevent the development of life-threatening melanoma.
Arch Dermatol. 1992;128657- 660
Google ScholarCrossref 28.Pitman
GHKopf
AWBart
RSGasson
PR Treatment of lentigo maligna and lentigo maligna melanoma.
J Dermatol Surg Oncol. 1979;5727- 737
Google ScholarCrossref 29.Coleman 3rd
WPDavis
RSReed
RJKrementz
ET Treatment of lentigo maligna and lentigo maligna melanoma.
J Dermatol Surg Oncol. 1980;6476- 479
Google ScholarCrossref 30.Grande
DJKoranda
FCWhitaker
DC Surgery of extensive, subclinical lentigo maligna.
J Dermatol Surg Oncol. 1982;8493- 496
Google ScholarCrossref 31.Cohen
LMMcCall
MWHodge
SJFreedman
JDCallen
JPZax
RH Successful treatment of lentigo maligna and lentigo maligna melanoma with Mohs micrographic surgery aided by rush permanent sections.
Cancer. 1994;732964- 2970
Google ScholarCrossref 32.Cohen
LMMcCall
MWZax
RH Mohs micrographic surgery for lentigo maligna and lentigo maligna melanoma.
Dermatol Surg. 1998;24673- 677
Google Scholar 34.Dhawan
SSWolf
DJRabinovitz
HSPoulos
E Lentigo maligna: the use of rush permanent sections in therapy.
Arch Dermatol. 1990;126928- 930
Google ScholarCrossref 35.Stonecipher
MRLeshin
BPatrick
JWhite
WL Management of lentigo maligna and lentigo maligna melanoma with paraffin-embedded tangential sections: utility of immunoperoxidase staining and supplemental vertical sections.
J Am Acad Dermatol. 1993;29589- 594
Google ScholarCrossref 36.Johnson
TMHeadington
JTBaker
SRLowe
L Usefulness of the staged excision for lentigo maligna and lentigo maligna melanoma: the "square" procedure.
J Am Acad Dermatol. 1997;37758- 764
Google ScholarCrossref