[Skip to Navigation]
Sign In
Figure 1. 
Collected laser plume samples contain bovine papillomavirus (BPV) DNA. DNA specimens extracted from plume samples were electrophoresed in parallel with BPV-2 virion DNA, subjected to Southern blotting, and probed with phosphorus 32–labeled BPV-1 DNA. Numbers 1 through 3 correspond to the 3 different sets of laser parameters described in the "Materials and Methods" section; they are presented in triplicate (a-c).

Collected laser plume samples contain bovine papillomavirus (BPV) DNA. DNA specimens extracted from plume samples were electrophoresed in parallel with BPV-2 virion DNA, subjected to Southern blotting, and probed with phosphorus 32–labeled BPV-1 DNA. Numbers 1 through 3 correspond to the 3 different sets of laser parameters described in the "Materials and Methods" section; they are presented in triplicate (a-c).

Figure 2. 
Viral DNA in collected laser plume samples is resistant to deoxyribonuclease (DNase) I digestion. Laser plume material containing purified pGEM5 plasmid DNA was digested with varying concentrations of deoxyribonuclease (DNase) I, as described in the "Materials and Methods" section. Southern blot hybridization was accomplished with a probe consisting of bovine papillomavirus (BPV) and plasmid vector sequences.

Viral DNA in collected laser plume samples is resistant to deoxyribonuclease (DNase) I digestion. Laser plume material containing purified pGEM5 plasmid DNA was digested with varying concentrations of deoxyribonuclease (DNase) I, as described in the "Materials and Methods" section. Southern blot hybridization was accomplished with a probe consisting of bovine papillomavirus (BPV) and plasmid vector sequences.

Figure 3. 
Bovine fibropapillomas occurred at the site of inoculation of control bovine papillomavirus tumor extract, which was not treated with the laser (full size).

Bovine fibropapillomas occurred at the site of inoculation of control bovine papillomavirus tumor extract, which was not treated with the laser (full size).

Figure 4. 
Bovine fibropapillomas occurred at the sites of inoculation of collected laser plume. Numbers 1 through 3 correspond to the 3 different sets of laser parameters described in the "Materials and Methods" section. The white ring is a freeze brand, used as a marker for identification of inoculation sites.

Bovine fibropapillomas occurred at the sites of inoculation of collected laser plume. Numbers 1 through 3 correspond to the 3 different sets of laser parameters described in the "Materials and Methods" section. The white ring is a freeze brand, used as a marker for identification of inoculation sites.

Figure 5. 
Laser plume–induced bovine tumors and the laser plume contain bovine papillomavirus (BPV) type 1 DNA. Laser plume–induced tumor extracts (1-3), and a tumor extract (T) and laser plume sample (L) digested with BamHI, were analyzed by Southern blot hybridization. Numbers 1 through 3 correspond to the 3 different sets of laser parameters described in the "Materials and Methods" section.

Laser plume–induced bovine tumors and the laser plume contain bovine papillomavirus (BPV) type 1 DNA. Laser plume–induced tumor extracts (1-3), and a tumor extract (T) and laser plume sample (L) digested with BamHI, were analyzed by Southern blot hybridization. Numbers 1 through 3 correspond to the 3 different sets of laser parameters described in the "Materials and Methods" section.

1.
Bellina  JHStjernholm  RLKurpel  JE Analysis of plume emissions after papovavirus irradiation with the carbon dioxide laser.  J Reprod Med. 1982;27268- 270Google Scholar
2.
Mullarky  MBNorris  CWGoldberg  ID The efficacy of the CO2 laser in the sterilization of skin seeded with bacteria: survival at the skin surface and in the plume emission.  Laryngoscope. 1985;95186- 187Google ScholarCrossref
3.
Walker  NPJMatthews  JNewson  SWB Possible hazards from irradiation with the carbon dioxide laser.  Lasers Surg Med. 1986;684- 86Google ScholarCrossref
4.
Byrne  POSisson  PROliver  PDInghan  HR Carbon dioxide laser irradiation of bacterial targets in vitro.  J Hosp Infect. 1987;9265- 273Google ScholarCrossref
5.
Garden  JMO'Banion  MKShelnitz  LS  et al.  Papillomavirus in the vapor of carbon dioxide laser–treated verrucae.  JAMA. 1988;2591199- 1202Google ScholarCrossref
6.
Sawchuk  WSWeber  PJLowy  DRDzubow  LM Infectious papillomavirus in the vapor of warts treated with carbon dioxide laser or electrocoagulation: detection and protection.  J Am Acad Dermatol. 1989;2141- 49Google ScholarCrossref
7.
Andre  POrth  GEvenou  PGuillaume  JCAvril  MF Risk of papillomavirus infection in carbon dioxide laser treatment of genital lesions.  J Am Acad Dermatol. 1990;22131- 132Google ScholarCrossref
8.
Ferenczy  ABergeron  CRichart  RM Human papillomavirus DNA in CO2 laser–generated plume of smoke and its consequences to the surgeon.  Obstet Gynecol. 1990;75114- 118Google Scholar
9.
Matchette  LSVegella  TJFaaland  RW Viable bacteriophage in CO2 laser plume: aerodynamic size distribution.  Lasers Surg Med. 1993;1318- 22Google ScholarCrossref
10.
Starr  JCKilmer  SLWheeland  RG Analysis of the carbon dioxide laser plume for simian immunodeficiency virus.  J Dermatol Surg Oncol. 1992;18297- 300Google ScholarCrossref
11.
Baggish  MSPoiesz  BJJoret  DWilliamson  PRefai  A Presence of human immunodeficiency virus DNA in laser smoke.  Lasers Surg Med. 1991;11197- 203Google ScholarCrossref
12.
Lobraico  RVSchifano  MJBrader  KR A retrospective study on the hazards of the carbon dioxide laser plume.  J Laser Appl. 1988;16- 8Google ScholarCrossref
13.
Lobraico  RVSchifano  MJBrader  KR Acquired HPV lesions compared in laser and nonlaser users.  J Gynecol Surg. 1989;577- 85Google ScholarCrossref
14.
Gloster  HMY  JrRoenigk  RK Risk of acquiring human papillomavirus from the plume produced by the carbon dioxide laser in the treatment of warts.  J Am Acad Dermatol. 1995;32436- 441Google ScholarCrossref
15.
Ito  Y A tumor producing factor extracted by phenol from papillomatous tissue (Shope) of cottontail rabbits.  Virology. 1960;12596- 601Google ScholarCrossref
16.
Ito  YEvans  CA Induction of tumors in domestic rabbits with nucleic acid preparations from partially purified Shope papilloma virus and from extracts of the papillomas of domestic and cottontail rabbits.  J Exp Med. 1961;114485- 500Google ScholarCrossref
17.
Lowy  DRDvoretzky  IShober  RLaw  M-FEngel  LHowley  PM In vitro tumorigenic transformation by a defined subgenomic fragment of bovine papillomavirus DNA.  Nature. 1980;28772- 74Google ScholarCrossref
18.
Ziegler  BLThomas  CAMeier  TMüller  RFliedner  TMWeber  L Generation of infectious retrovirus aerosol through medical laser irradiation.  Lasers Surg Med. 1998;2237- 41Google ScholarCrossref
19.
Sundberg  JPJunge  RELancaster  WD Immunoperoxidase localization of papillomaviruses in hyperplastic and neoplastic epithelial lesions of animals.  Am J Vet Res. 1984;451441- 1446Google Scholar
20.
O'Banion  MKReichmann  MESundberg  JP Cloning and characterization of an equine cutaneous papillomavirus.  Virology. 1986;152100- 109Google ScholarCrossref
21.
Jenson  ABRosenthal  JDOlson  CPass  FLancaster  WDShah  K Immunological relatedness of papillomaviruses from different species.  J Natl Cancer Inst. 1980;64495- 500Google Scholar
22.
Abramson  ALDiLorenzo  TPSteinberg  BM Is papillomavirus detectable in the plume of laser-treated laryngeal papilloma?  Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1990;116604- 607Google ScholarCrossref
23.
Southern  EM Detection of specific sequences among DNA fragments separated by gel electrophoresis.  J Mol Biol. 1975;98503- 517Google ScholarCrossref
24.
Feinberg  APVogelstin  B A technique for radiolabeling DNA restriction endonuclease fragments to high specific activity.  Anal Biochem. 1983;1326- 13Google ScholarCrossref
25.
Olson  COlson  ROHubbard–Van Stelle  S Variations of response of cattle to experimentally induced viral papillomatosis.  J Am Vet Med Assoc. 1992;20156- 62Google Scholar
26.
Lancaster  WDOlson  C Demonstration of two distinct clones of bovine papillomavirus.  Virology. 1978;89372- 379Google ScholarCrossref
27.
Lancaster  WD Physical maps of bovine papillomavirus type 1 and type 2 genomes.  J Virol. 1979;32684- 687Google Scholar
28.
Kokosa  JMEugene  J Chemical composition of laser-tissue interaction smoke plume.  J Laser Appl. 1989;159- 63Google ScholarCrossref
29.
Tomita  YMihashi  SNagata  K  et al.  Mutagenicity of smoke condensates induced by CO2-laser irradiation and electrocauterization.  Mutat Res. 1981;89145- 149Google ScholarCrossref
30.
Nezhat  CWiner  WKNezhat  FNezhat  CForrest  DReeves  WG Smoke from laser surgery: is there a health hazard?  Lasers Surg Med. 1987;7376- 382Google ScholarCrossref
31.
Mihashi  SUeda  SHirano  MTomita  YHirohata  T Some problems about condensates induced by CO2 laser irradiation.  Paper presented at: Fourth International Society for Laser Surgery November 1981 Tokyo, Japan
32.
Baggish  MSElbakry  M The effects of laser smoke on the lungs of rats.  Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1987;1561260- 1265Google ScholarCrossref
33.
Wenig  BLStenson  KMWenig  BMTracey  D Effects of plume produced by the Nd:YAG laser and electrocautery on the respiratory system.  Lasers Surg Med. 1993;13242- 245Google ScholarCrossref
34.
Mihashi  SJako  GJIncze  JStrong  MSVaughan  CW Laser surgery in otolaryngology: interaction of CO2 laser and soft tissue.  Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1976;267263- 294Google ScholarCrossref
35.
Oosterhuis  JWVerschueren  RCJEibergen  ROldhoff  J The viability of cells in waste products of CO2 laser evaporation of cloudman mouse melanomas.  Cancer. 1982;4961- 67Google ScholarCrossref
36.
Voorhies  RMLavyne  MHStrait  TAShapiro  WR Does the CO2 laser spread viable brain-tumor cells outside the surgical field?  J Neurosurg. 1984;60819- 820Google ScholarCrossref
37.
Hoye  RCKetcham  ASRiggle  GC The air-born dissemination of viable tumor by high-energy neodymium laser.  Life Sci. 1967;6119- 125Google ScholarCrossref
38.
Capizzi  PJClay  RPBattey  MJ Microbiologic activity in laser resurfacing plume and debris.  Lasers Surg Med. 1998;23172- 174Google ScholarCrossref
39.
Hughes  PSHHughes  AP Absence of human papillomavirus DNA in the plume of erbium:YAG laser–treated warts.  J Am Acad Dermatol. 1998;38426- 428Google ScholarCrossref
40.
Taravella  MJWeinberg  ABlackburn  PMay  M Do intact particles survive excimer laser ablation?  Arch Ophthalmol. 1997;1151028- 1030Google ScholarCrossref
41.
Ferenczy  ABraun  LShah  KV Human papillomavirus (HPV) in condylomatous lesions of the cervix: a comparative ultrastructural and immunohistochemical study.  Am J Surg Pathol. 1981;5661- 670Google ScholarCrossref
42.
Hallmo  PNaess  O Laryngeal papillomatosis with human papillomavirus DNA contracted by a laser surgeon.  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 1991;248425- 427Google ScholarCrossref
43.
Garden  JM The hazards of laser plume: a mid-year committee report.  Am Soc Laser Med Surg. 1989;16Google Scholar
Study
October 2002

Viral Disease Transmitted by Laser-Generated Plume (Aerosol)

Author Affiliations

From the Departments of Dermatology (Drs Garden and Bakus) and Biomedical Engineering (Dr Garden), Northwestern University, the Divisions of Dermatology and Plastic Surgery, The Children's Memorial Hospital, (Dr Garden) Chicago, Ill; the Department of Medicine, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY (Dr O'Banion); and the Department of Veterinary Science, University of Wisconsin, Madison (Dr Olson).

Arch Dermatol. 2002;138(10):1303-1307. doi:10.1001/archderm.138.10.1303
Abstract

Objective  To evaluate the possibility of disease transmission through liberated plume from virally infected tissue that is exposed to the carbon dioxide laser.

Design  Bovine papillomavirus–induced cutaneous fibropapillomas were exposed to the carbon dioxide laser. Laser settings were within the range of clinically used settings. The laser plume (aerosol) was suctioned and collected and then reinoculated onto the skin of calves.

Setting  University laboratory research center.

Main Outcome Measures  Laser plume viral content and postinoculation tumor growth were analyzed and documented.

Results  Collected laser plume contained papillomavirus DNA in all tested laser settings. The viral DNA was most likely encapsulated. Tumors developed at laser plume–inoculated sites for all laser parameter settings. Histological and biochemical analyses revealed that these tumors were infected with the same virus type as present in the laser plume.

Conclusions  Laser plume has been shown, for the first time to our knowledge, to actually transmit disease. Strict care must be maintained by the laser practitioner to minimize potential health risks, especially when treating viral-induced lesions or patients with viral disease.

THERE HAS been an increasing awareness of the potential health risk of laser-generated plume (aerosol). Many laser systems, on impact with targeted tissue, produce a plume of smoke containing debris and vapor, which is released into the surrounding area. Concerns involving aerosolized carbonized material, viable tumor cell dispersion, and infection transmission have been evaluated.

The carbon dioxide (CO2) laser is used by various medical specialties to vaporize, ablate, or cut tissue. This instrument emits light energy in the lower infrared range (10 600 nm), which is effectively absorbed by water. Because of the relatively high water content of tissue, the laser energy is readily converted to heat. Copious amounts of plume are generated, which necessitates constant suction away from the procedural area through a filter system.

Early studies that evaluated the laser plume for aerosolized infectious material were prematurely reassuring. Besides occasional bacterial spores recovered from experimentally inoculated tissue, there was no other discovered aerosolized infectious material.1-4 In 1988, intact bovine papillomavirus (BPV) and human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA specimens were recovered from the plume of CO2 laser–treated human and bovine lesions.5 Several subsequent investigations6-8 have confirmed these results with the papillomavirus, while viable bacteriophages have been found in the CO2 laser plume using an agar model.9 Although a simian immunodeficiency virus model failed to recover any virus from the laser plume,10 positive results were obtained with an in vitro study11 of the human immunodeficiency virus. Also, clinical surveys of laser users have revealed increased user infections with HPV; however, direct lesional contact may be the source of infectivity.12-14

Intact papillomavirus DNA is a potential infectious agent.15-17 Although in vitro methods have detected liberated infective virus in the collected plume, in the papillomavirus6 and the human immunodeficiency virus11 models using the CO2 laser, and in an in vitro study18 of erbium (ER):YAG laser–generated aerosol, the induction of actual infection by the laser plume, to our knowledge, has not been documented. Reproducing the infection, with identification of the causative agent, would confirm the potential of laser aerosol in transmitting disease.

To determine whether laser-generated plume from infected tissue can reproduce disease, the bovine fibropapilloma, a BPV-induced lesion, was used. Various CO2 laser settings were evaluated, and laser plume at each laser setting was collected and inoculated into animals. Typical BPV lesions containing BPV developed for all laser settings. These viral tumors confirm the ability of the laser plume to produce infection.

Materials and methods

Bovine cutaneous fibropapillomas, produced from the inoculation of BPV-1, were surgically excised from the cattle and promptly frozen and stored at −65°C. All study of animal subjects received prior institutional review board approval. Fibropapillomas positive for BPV by the peroxidase-antiperoxidase technique19-21 were exposed to various CO2 laser exposures in triplicate. All of the fibropapillomas were at room temperature during the laser exposures. Laser settings included the following: (1) 12 W and a 2-mm circular spot size delivered in a continuous fashion (power density, 380 W/cm2; and spatially averaged energy fluence, 400 J/cm2); (2) 4 W, a 2-mm spot size, and continuous exposure (power density, 130 W/cm2; and spatially averaged energy fluence, 130 J/cm2); and (3) 8 W, a 0.2-mm spot size, and a pulse duration of 0.1 second (power density, 25 400 W/cm2; and spatially averaged energy fluence, 2540 J/cm2).

A bubble chamber containing phosphate-buffered saline solution (pH, 7.4) was placed within a vacuum suction line (500 mm Hg) used to collect the laser-generated plume. The suction tip was placed approximately 2 cm from the tumor. Extreme care was taken not to have the suction tip directly contact the papilloma.22 The collected material was initially evaluated for BPV content and later inoculated in duplicate on the scarified skin of 3 calves. Control BPV inoculates were also placed on the skin of these animals. Growth at inoculation sites was excised after 106 days and analyzed histologically and biochemically for viral content and typing.

DNA extraction from the collected plume material in phosphate-buffered saline and from each tumor was performed. Deoxyribonuclease sensitivity experiments used pooled vapor material mixed with purified pGEM5 plasmid DNA (Promega Corp, Madison, Wis). The sample was then divided into 3 equal volumes and digested with 1.0 µg, 0.1 µg, or no deoxyribonuclease (Worthington Biochemical Corp, Lakewood, NJ). Purified DNA samples were subjected to gel electrophoresis, transferred to membranes23 (Duralon; Stratagene, La Jolla, Calif), and UV cross-linked (Stratagene). A purified BPV-2 virion DNA sample was used as a positive control. Bovine papillomaviruses 1 and 2 have homologous DNA, and both types are causative agents of bovine fibropapillomas. Hybridizations were performed with a BPV-1–cloned DNA probe labeled by the random primer method24 (Boehringer-Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany), as previously described.20 Signals were detected by autoradiography.

Results

All of the laser plume samples for the 3 studied laser parameters contained substantial amounts of BPV DNA, as revealed by hybridization of the DNA extracts (Figure 1). Although form II (circular DNA) was the most prominent in all samples, forms III (linear DNA) and I (supercoiled DNA) were present. The positions of these DNA forms corresponded exactly to those obtained with DNA from control BPV virions (Figure 1). This direct correlation is evidence that the plume-collected viral DNA was intact.

No signal for the naked plasmid DNA was observed in the laser plume samples treated with deoxyribonuclease, whereas a portion of the BPV DNA in the sample survived enzyme treatment with concentrations of 0.1 and 1.0 µg (Figure 2). Because the plasmid DNA is present in the same mixture, it can be concluded that the enzyme activity is not inhibited by components of the laser plume sample. Thus, the selective protection of the collected BPV DNA suggests that part of the viral DNA in the laser plume is still encapsulated.

Of 3 calves, 2 developed marked lesions in sites of control BPV concentrate inoculum (Figure 3). The third calf had only minimal growth. A varying degree of papillomavirus infection susceptibility occurs in this animal model.25

Lesions developed at laser plume inoculation sites for all 3 laser parameters. Of the 2 calves with a strong BPV control response, one developed lesions with material collected using each of the 3 parameters (Figure 4) and the other developed lesions with material collected from the laser plume, which corresponded to the highest power density and energy fluence. The calf that had a minor response to the control BPV inoculum did not develop other lesions.

The results of a histological evaluation of the excised laser plume–induced lesions were typical of BPV fibropapillomas. The epidermis revealed hyperkeratosis, acanthosis, and papillomatous changes. Foci of large vacuolated cells appeared in the upper epidermal layers. Sections stained positive for BPV capsid antigen in all lesions.

DNA extracts from each of the 3 induced tumors also contained high levels of BPV DNA (Figure 5), confirming that the lesions arose by BPV infection. The more rapid migration of form II DNA, relative to the control DNA in extracts from 2 of the tumors, is presumably due to the presence of large amounts of cellular DNA in those samples. Additional bands above form II DNA are likely to represent multimeric forms of BPV. Digestion of a laser plume–induced tumor sample, and a laser plume sample with the restriction enzyme BamHI, demonstrated only 1 band, thus distinguishing the BPV as type 1 (BPV-2 has 2 BamHI restriction sites).26,27 This correspondence of viral types in the laser plume, and in induced tumors, provides additional evidence for a causative role in lesion induction by the laser plume.

Comment

The CO2 laser is an effective instrument in many medical specialties. Water within the tissue absorbs the laser energy, converting it to heat that produces the desired effect and a thick plume of vapor and debris that must be removed by suction. Analysis of the plume has revealed various components besides the water vapor,28 which can be irritating to the eyes and respiratory tract and are known animal or human mutagens and carcinogens. Laser smoke condensates, from control animal tissue in modified Ames tests, have produced mutagenicity.29

The size of the mainly homogeneous particulate matter present in the plume debris can easily spread into the surrounding environment and reach the entire respiratory system, producing, in study animals, pathologic changes.30-33 Cellular elements are also recovered with the CO2 laser, most cells are carbonized or distorted, and intact cells have not been viable after placement into tissue culture.34-36 However, with other laser systems, viable cells have been found.37

Since an earlier study5 of animal and HPV lesions treated with the CO2 laser revealed intact viral DNA in the generated plume, viral DNA has been detected in subsequent studies from bovine fibropapillomas (BPV), plantar warts,6 and genital verrucae (HPV).7,8 A bioassay of the plume detected infectious BPV.6 In a tissue culture study11 using the CO2 laser, proviral human immunodeficiency virus DNA was recovered from the suction tubing used to remove the plume. However, no sustained infection occurred in cultured cells inoculated by the laser plume–contaminated tubing.

In the present study, BPV viral DNA was again readily detected in the laser aerosol. In addition, a portion of this DNA was not sensitive to deoxyribonuclease treatment, suggesting that whole virion particles were present in the laser plume. Most important, when the collected plume produced from a wide range of various laser parameters was used as an inoculum, lesions were induced. Based on histopathological and viral typing criteria, the laser plume–induced lesions were identical to the original tumors.

This study addresses the use of the CO2 laser, either in a continuous mode or pulsed at 100 milliseconds. Lasers used for tissue resurfacing, such as the CO2 or the Er:YAG laser, are pulsed for short exposures, from 10 to generally less than 1 millisecond. These rapid pulses produce a more explosive response with greater tissue ablation.

A study38 analyzing CO2 laser plume captured during resurfacing cases revealed viable bacteria. The filter size used in the study was too porous to capture viruses, and there was no indication of viral infection in these patients. An Er:YAG laser used in resurfacing verrucae vulgaris did not find any HPV DNA in material collected on the laser handpiece.39 This material may have represented desiccated debris, and perhaps material directly collected in the plume would have revealed HPV DNA. Ziegler et al,18 using the Er:YAG laser, did demonstrate, through in vitro methods, viable cells, viral genes, and infectious viruses. Therefore, it seems that short-pulsed resurfacing lasers also have the potential of liberating infectious material.

Another type of laser that has a short pulse duration, and is used in ophthalmology for tissue ablation (photorefractive keratectomy), is the excimer laser. At 193 nm, and nanosecond pulse durations, it was able to experimentally disrupt the fairly large (180-200 nm) attenuated varicella-zoster virus, with only fragments present in the laser plume.40 However, as the researchers themselves comment, it is unknown whether smaller viruses (ie, papillomavirus, hepatitis, and retrovirus) would be undamaged and liberated into the plume. More important, the UV wavelength of the excimer laser immediately disrupts surface cells, allowing for little tissue penetration. The Er:YAG laser at 2940 nm and the CO2 laser at 10 600 nm have greater tissue penetration, producing a deeper ablative effect, potentially expelling much more intact material.

These studies and the findings in the present study increase the concern surrounding the use of aerosol-producing lasers in the treatment of virally induced lesions and virally infected (or potentially infected) patients. With HPV and the human immunodeficiency virus already detected in laser plume, it is possible that other viruses, such as hepatitis, may also be liberated in the plume during laser use. Fortunately, most HPV lesions, particularly those of genital origin, contain fewer particles than those studied in the bovine fibropapilloma model,41 and the direct inoculation of the laser plume in our study onto the animals may not equal routine clinical exposure. However, there is already a report42 of a surgeon, who treats anogenital condylomas with the Nd:YAG laser, developing laryngeal papillomatosis containing HPV DNA types 6 and 11.

It is even more relevant, with the proved potential for disease transmission, that safety precautions during laser surgery be strictly maintained. These include limiting the use of aerosol-producing lasers to patients for whom there is a strong therapeutic advantage over other modalities, protection of skin surfaces with gloves and gowns, eye protection, and the use of masks and smoke suction systems that have high flow volume and good filtration.43

Accepted for publication February 26, 2002.

This study was supported by a grant from the J. P. Wilmot Foundation; a grant from the Stackhouse Inc, Palm Springs, Calif; and the Dr Guy G. Graham Fund.

We thank John P. Sundberg, DVM, PhD, for immunoperoxidase BPV identification; Robert O. Olson, PhD, for production and use of the BPV papillomas; and Yasmeen S. Salem, MD, for technical assistance.

Corresponding author: Jerome M. Garden, MD, Department of Dermatology, 150 E Huron, Suite 910, Chicago, IL 60611 (e-mail: j_garden@northwestern.edu).

References
1.
Bellina  JHStjernholm  RLKurpel  JE Analysis of plume emissions after papovavirus irradiation with the carbon dioxide laser.  J Reprod Med. 1982;27268- 270Google Scholar
2.
Mullarky  MBNorris  CWGoldberg  ID The efficacy of the CO2 laser in the sterilization of skin seeded with bacteria: survival at the skin surface and in the plume emission.  Laryngoscope. 1985;95186- 187Google ScholarCrossref
3.
Walker  NPJMatthews  JNewson  SWB Possible hazards from irradiation with the carbon dioxide laser.  Lasers Surg Med. 1986;684- 86Google ScholarCrossref
4.
Byrne  POSisson  PROliver  PDInghan  HR Carbon dioxide laser irradiation of bacterial targets in vitro.  J Hosp Infect. 1987;9265- 273Google ScholarCrossref
5.
Garden  JMO'Banion  MKShelnitz  LS  et al.  Papillomavirus in the vapor of carbon dioxide laser–treated verrucae.  JAMA. 1988;2591199- 1202Google ScholarCrossref
6.
Sawchuk  WSWeber  PJLowy  DRDzubow  LM Infectious papillomavirus in the vapor of warts treated with carbon dioxide laser or electrocoagulation: detection and protection.  J Am Acad Dermatol. 1989;2141- 49Google ScholarCrossref
7.
Andre  POrth  GEvenou  PGuillaume  JCAvril  MF Risk of papillomavirus infection in carbon dioxide laser treatment of genital lesions.  J Am Acad Dermatol. 1990;22131- 132Google ScholarCrossref
8.
Ferenczy  ABergeron  CRichart  RM Human papillomavirus DNA in CO2 laser–generated plume of smoke and its consequences to the surgeon.  Obstet Gynecol. 1990;75114- 118Google Scholar
9.
Matchette  LSVegella  TJFaaland  RW Viable bacteriophage in CO2 laser plume: aerodynamic size distribution.  Lasers Surg Med. 1993;1318- 22Google ScholarCrossref
10.
Starr  JCKilmer  SLWheeland  RG Analysis of the carbon dioxide laser plume for simian immunodeficiency virus.  J Dermatol Surg Oncol. 1992;18297- 300Google ScholarCrossref
11.
Baggish  MSPoiesz  BJJoret  DWilliamson  PRefai  A Presence of human immunodeficiency virus DNA in laser smoke.  Lasers Surg Med. 1991;11197- 203Google ScholarCrossref
12.
Lobraico  RVSchifano  MJBrader  KR A retrospective study on the hazards of the carbon dioxide laser plume.  J Laser Appl. 1988;16- 8Google ScholarCrossref
13.
Lobraico  RVSchifano  MJBrader  KR Acquired HPV lesions compared in laser and nonlaser users.  J Gynecol Surg. 1989;577- 85Google ScholarCrossref
14.
Gloster  HMY  JrRoenigk  RK Risk of acquiring human papillomavirus from the plume produced by the carbon dioxide laser in the treatment of warts.  J Am Acad Dermatol. 1995;32436- 441Google ScholarCrossref
15.
Ito  Y A tumor producing factor extracted by phenol from papillomatous tissue (Shope) of cottontail rabbits.  Virology. 1960;12596- 601Google ScholarCrossref
16.
Ito  YEvans  CA Induction of tumors in domestic rabbits with nucleic acid preparations from partially purified Shope papilloma virus and from extracts of the papillomas of domestic and cottontail rabbits.  J Exp Med. 1961;114485- 500Google ScholarCrossref
17.
Lowy  DRDvoretzky  IShober  RLaw  M-FEngel  LHowley  PM In vitro tumorigenic transformation by a defined subgenomic fragment of bovine papillomavirus DNA.  Nature. 1980;28772- 74Google ScholarCrossref
18.
Ziegler  BLThomas  CAMeier  TMüller  RFliedner  TMWeber  L Generation of infectious retrovirus aerosol through medical laser irradiation.  Lasers Surg Med. 1998;2237- 41Google ScholarCrossref
19.
Sundberg  JPJunge  RELancaster  WD Immunoperoxidase localization of papillomaviruses in hyperplastic and neoplastic epithelial lesions of animals.  Am J Vet Res. 1984;451441- 1446Google Scholar
20.
O'Banion  MKReichmann  MESundberg  JP Cloning and characterization of an equine cutaneous papillomavirus.  Virology. 1986;152100- 109Google ScholarCrossref
21.
Jenson  ABRosenthal  JDOlson  CPass  FLancaster  WDShah  K Immunological relatedness of papillomaviruses from different species.  J Natl Cancer Inst. 1980;64495- 500Google Scholar
22.
Abramson  ALDiLorenzo  TPSteinberg  BM Is papillomavirus detectable in the plume of laser-treated laryngeal papilloma?  Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1990;116604- 607Google ScholarCrossref
23.
Southern  EM Detection of specific sequences among DNA fragments separated by gel electrophoresis.  J Mol Biol. 1975;98503- 517Google ScholarCrossref
24.
Feinberg  APVogelstin  B A technique for radiolabeling DNA restriction endonuclease fragments to high specific activity.  Anal Biochem. 1983;1326- 13Google ScholarCrossref
25.
Olson  COlson  ROHubbard–Van Stelle  S Variations of response of cattle to experimentally induced viral papillomatosis.  J Am Vet Med Assoc. 1992;20156- 62Google Scholar
26.
Lancaster  WDOlson  C Demonstration of two distinct clones of bovine papillomavirus.  Virology. 1978;89372- 379Google ScholarCrossref
27.
Lancaster  WD Physical maps of bovine papillomavirus type 1 and type 2 genomes.  J Virol. 1979;32684- 687Google Scholar
28.
Kokosa  JMEugene  J Chemical composition of laser-tissue interaction smoke plume.  J Laser Appl. 1989;159- 63Google ScholarCrossref
29.
Tomita  YMihashi  SNagata  K  et al.  Mutagenicity of smoke condensates induced by CO2-laser irradiation and electrocauterization.  Mutat Res. 1981;89145- 149Google ScholarCrossref
30.
Nezhat  CWiner  WKNezhat  FNezhat  CForrest  DReeves  WG Smoke from laser surgery: is there a health hazard?  Lasers Surg Med. 1987;7376- 382Google ScholarCrossref
31.
Mihashi  SUeda  SHirano  MTomita  YHirohata  T Some problems about condensates induced by CO2 laser irradiation.  Paper presented at: Fourth International Society for Laser Surgery November 1981 Tokyo, Japan
32.
Baggish  MSElbakry  M The effects of laser smoke on the lungs of rats.  Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1987;1561260- 1265Google ScholarCrossref
33.
Wenig  BLStenson  KMWenig  BMTracey  D Effects of plume produced by the Nd:YAG laser and electrocautery on the respiratory system.  Lasers Surg Med. 1993;13242- 245Google ScholarCrossref
34.
Mihashi  SJako  GJIncze  JStrong  MSVaughan  CW Laser surgery in otolaryngology: interaction of CO2 laser and soft tissue.  Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1976;267263- 294Google ScholarCrossref
35.
Oosterhuis  JWVerschueren  RCJEibergen  ROldhoff  J The viability of cells in waste products of CO2 laser evaporation of cloudman mouse melanomas.  Cancer. 1982;4961- 67Google ScholarCrossref
36.
Voorhies  RMLavyne  MHStrait  TAShapiro  WR Does the CO2 laser spread viable brain-tumor cells outside the surgical field?  J Neurosurg. 1984;60819- 820Google ScholarCrossref
37.
Hoye  RCKetcham  ASRiggle  GC The air-born dissemination of viable tumor by high-energy neodymium laser.  Life Sci. 1967;6119- 125Google ScholarCrossref
38.
Capizzi  PJClay  RPBattey  MJ Microbiologic activity in laser resurfacing plume and debris.  Lasers Surg Med. 1998;23172- 174Google ScholarCrossref
39.
Hughes  PSHHughes  AP Absence of human papillomavirus DNA in the plume of erbium:YAG laser–treated warts.  J Am Acad Dermatol. 1998;38426- 428Google ScholarCrossref
40.
Taravella  MJWeinberg  ABlackburn  PMay  M Do intact particles survive excimer laser ablation?  Arch Ophthalmol. 1997;1151028- 1030Google ScholarCrossref
41.
Ferenczy  ABraun  LShah  KV Human papillomavirus (HPV) in condylomatous lesions of the cervix: a comparative ultrastructural and immunohistochemical study.  Am J Surg Pathol. 1981;5661- 670Google ScholarCrossref
42.
Hallmo  PNaess  O Laryngeal papillomatosis with human papillomavirus DNA contracted by a laser surgeon.  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 1991;248425- 427Google ScholarCrossref
43.
Garden  JM The hazards of laser plume: a mid-year committee report.  Am Soc Laser Med Surg. 1989;16Google Scholar
×