[Skip to Content]
[Skip to Content Landing]
Citations 0
Editor's Correspondence
Nov 28, 2011

Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Persistent Occlusion of the Infarct-Related Artery: An Expanded View of the Evidence—Reply

Author Affiliations

Author Affiliations: Cardiovascular Clinical Research Center, New York University School of Medicine, New York (Dr Hochman); and Division of Cardiology, St Michael's Hospital, and Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (Dr Buller).

Arch Intern Med. 2011;171(21):1962-1963. doi:10.1001/archinternmed.2011.552

In reply

We agree with Appleton et al that “Patients who present late with an acute MI are a heterogeneous population”; the OAT results do not apply to all. It is precisely this heterogeneity that makes conclusions from the meta-analysis by Abbate et al1 invalid. That analysis did not restrict itself to patients with total occlusions late after MI, but rather included patients with closed and patent IRAs.2 The meta-analysis that restricted itself to post-MI patients with total IRA occlusion showed no benefit from routine PCI.3 It is this subset to which the updated guideline recommendation applies.