[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Invited Commentary
Dec 12 2011

What Is Health Coaching Anyway?: Standards Needed to Enable Rigorous Research: Comment on “Evaluation of a Behavior Support Intervention for Patients With Poorly Controlled Diabetes”

Author Affiliations

Author Affiliations: Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.

Arch Intern Med. 2011;171(22):2017-2018. doi:10.1001/archinternmed.2011.508

Behavioral change interventions delivered through the telephone have accumulated solid evidence supporting their efficacy for multiple behaviors, including physical activity and dietary change.1 It is commendable that Frosch et al2 undertook this approach in a sample of patients with limited external resources. Their most significant finding is that a telephonic “coaching” intervention was feasible and well-received by even the most socially and economically disadvantaged. While the “dose” and possibly content of the intervention studied was not adequate to elicit a differential change compared with controls, there are several important lessons embedded in the study's findings. Specifically, 98% of participants were reached by phone within 1 week of enrollment; 94% reviewed the provided DVD; 85% of those randomized to telephonic coaching participated; and 73% of those completed all 5 sessions. These statistics indicate a desire for diabetes self-management education and a willingness to engage in such interventions. Importantly, these results directly challenge the perception that individuals of lower socioeconomic status may be less motivated to learn self-care strategies.3,4