[Skip to Navigation]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
Editor's Correspondence
Mar 12, 2012

Screen Detection Has Both Winners and Losers

Author Affiliations

Author Affiliations: Department of Radiology, Cook County John H. Stroger Jr Hospital, Chicago, Illinois (Dr J. D. Keen); and School of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University of Nebraska, Lincoln (Dr J. Keen).

Arch Intern Med. 2012;172(5):447. doi:10.1001/archinternmed.2011.1885

Dr Welch is a pioneer in presenting the benefits and harms of screening to both clinicians and the public. However, Keen and Keen1,2 were the first to devise the method to calculate the life-saving proportion (LSP) of screen-detected breast cancers, using matched 15-year periods. The follow-up analysis promoting screening mammography insight used 10-year periods.3 The higher percentage of screen-detected cancers (61%-64% vs 50%-56%) in the article by Welch and Frankel4 makes our estimates higher, while the mixed 20-year/10-year death/diagnosis risk makes our estimates lower.