Author Affiliations: Cerebrovascular Center, Neurological Institute (Dr Uchino), Health Outcomes and Clinical Epidemiology, Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Lerner Research Institute (Dr Hernandez), Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio; and Quantitative Research Division, BioEstadistica, S.C., Monterrey, Nuevo Leon, Mexico (Dr Hernandez).
We appreciate the comments from Correia and Lopes. We acknowledge in the “Comment” section of our article1 that the Randomized Evaluation of Long Term Anticoagulant Therapy (RE-LY) Trial had a large impact on our study, comprising 59% of the cohort and 74% of the events. In all of the 7 studies, myocardial infarction (MI) and acute coronary syndrome (ACS) were secondary safety outcomes, and limitations in interpreting secondary outcomes are true across the studies. Given the scarcity of MI and ACS events and the imbalance between trial arms, performing a Mantel-Haenszel fixed-effects model for meta-analysis is a better method than a random-effects model.
Uchino K, Hernandez AV. Dabigatran and Myocardial Infarction: Meta-Illusion?—Reply. Arch Intern Med. 2012;172(10):823–823. doi:10.1001/archinternmed.2012.1154
Customize your JAMA Network experience by selecting one or more topics from the list below.
Create a personal account or sign in to: